Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection). After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.
Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level
Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention
| ||
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Almost every change over the past few months (aside from reverts and removing protection notice) has been disruptive, even before a semi-protection of one year ended. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry crossed with COI/UPE. The exact details of how many people are involved are a bit opaque because of the sockpuppetry but it appears to be at least two, including the article subject and someone paid to edit on her behalf. They have been asked to clarify this, stop engaging in sockpuppetry, and make the necessary disclosures (see here, here, here and here) but haven't done so.
They have a good faith desire to see the article updated and to see some unnecessary person info removed from it (which has now been done); but they are not using sources, removing existing sources and relevant info without explanation, and generally being disruptive. Protecting the page might prompt them to engage in discussion and lead to a resolution of these good faith concerns. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Brisbane Lions fans keep falsely claiming that this won them a premiership when it did not and keep adding it to the pages. Logged out users also keep vandalising the page with stuff about the lions such as "Lions won a prem with it" or "Lions own Wharfie Time now".
I would like to request a 3-6 month protection window while the hype from the 2026 AFL Grand Final dies down Flipstatic Energy (talk) 04:08, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If disruption continues, please re-request. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:32, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on this page and other Ahom-related pages. I think this falls under Contentious topics - South Asia.
EDIT: User in question is the subject of a sock puppetry investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ney_konware
Theemausoliam (talk) 05:53, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Promotional material has been added by a number of sockpuppets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BManning08 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheFinalCut1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Upgrader101
After these accounts were banned the same edits are now being made by temporary accounts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-50864-93 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-53104-86 Idontwantaaccount (talk) 07:06, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent removal/reversion of sourced material and continued disruption by a new user connected to the same dispute affecting other Ahom-related articles like Joymoti Konwari and Ahom kingdom. The article falls within the South Asia contentious topic, and temporary extended-confirmed protection may help prevent further disruption. Ananya Taye (talk) 07:59, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- The user who is disrupting Ahom articles is the subject of a sock puppetry investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ney_konware Theemausoliam (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Timeline of the introduction of color television in countries and territories (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: RighteousCoyote384 ~2026-53431-36 (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RunningOnBrains(talk) 19:58, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: The stones weight has recently come out as false with recent and historic evidence including this academic source Þorsteinsson, Kristleifur. "Kvíarnar á Húsafelli og aflraunasteinn séra Snorra." Eimreiðin, vol. 29, no. 3, 1923, pp. 166-173. A used by the name of pictwarrior keeps changing the weight back and saying this source backs up his weight of 409. There are no sources or evidence for that matter the stone has ever weighed that much. Can you please protect the page with the stones weight at 156 kg (346 lbs) while we get this resolved? People have gotten injured training for the false weight and we're trying to prevent that M0UNTA!n85 (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Toadspike. The Bushranger One ping only 21:30, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Curbon7 (talk) 19:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Curbon7 (talk) 19:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Curbon7 (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Curbon7 (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. grapesurgeon (talk) 13:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Not so persistent. Curbon7 (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term BMX target since 2018. Toketaatalk 14:00, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Comments: While it's true that the article has had some long-term issues with disruptive editing, the article already has Pending Changes set until May 2027. At the time of this edit, there appears to have only been one act of vandalism in the last three months for the article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The Bushranger One ping only 21:29, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 14:36, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: People changing the party to a far right Christian nationalist party when that is not the case ~2026-53715-33 (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
+1 Reason: High level of misinformation ~2026-53715-33 (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined One edit added the 'Christian nationalism' tag (and then you removed citations from an entirely different part of the infobox when reverting it). The Bushranger One ping only 21:28, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Alith Anar 19:12, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 21:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed–protected indefinitely. Logging as WP:CT/A-I. Curbon7 (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:39, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term abuse. If possible, please protect it for more than a day. Xacaranda (talk) 21:40, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:58, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Protection was bumped from semi to extended confirmed in 2022 after a multi-day long vandal spree waged by a known LTA through multiple throwaway accounts. In the four years since, they are seemly inactive, with their last known account discovered on July 2023 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awolf58/Archive). With this in mind, it doesn't seem too unreasonable to give semi another wurl. Giovanni Potage (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: No longer nessecary. The sock responsible for protection has probably moved on, judging how long their last known account has been inactive for (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stephaniemuue/Archive). Giovanni Potage (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Change the phrase "Israel–Hamas war" to "Isreal-Palestine war", or "Palestinian Genocide" ~2026-53774-97 (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.