Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44eccf3be322f31

Jump to content

Talk:Fandom (website)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Wikia)
Latest comment: 16 days ago by LixieZixie in topic Fandom's MediaWiki Version was updated to 1.43.9
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 8, 2018Articles for deletionSpeedily kept

Why these?

[edit]

Why is it that only these wikis get Wikipedia articles?

Why not the wikis for MLP: FIM, Marvel, Heroes, Harry Potter, Doctor Who, Villains, Dragon Ball, Riordan, Pure Evil, Superpowers, or even Disney? ~2026-20455-52 (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

the short answer is notability. those wikis have gotten independent coverage from other sources, to the extent of getting their own articles. in that same vein, it's why fandom has an article, but not fextralife (it's just a redirect to an article that doesn't mention it, so i've also nominated it for rfd) or wiki.gg (no article)
the long answer is reading the notability guideline linked above lol
if you can find reliable sources about those wikis (really, good luck with the pure evil and superpowers ones), they could then potentially get articles consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 19:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
What about this https://www.equestriadaily.com/2023/06/the-my-little-pony-wiki-gets-mentioned.html ~2026-20455-52 (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
not reliable. in this case, the source is user-generated (a blog) and not significant coverage (even the mention it describes in passing is in passing)
really, it's a good idea to read the policies on notability and reliable sources to get a feel for what would be usable consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 19:36, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
But it says the wiki was mentioned in an official comic. Besides, there's a Wikipedia article for everything else Brony related, including that website. ~2026-20455-52 (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
the comic itself also wouldn't be reliable unless secondary sources (think stuff like newspapers, but not as stuck in 2008) decided to report on it, and this one incident still isn't significant enough from what's been shown here
that is to say, if you can find reliable sources reporting on the reference to the wiki, it might be a good idea to add those
also, i know for a fact that there's not an article for "everything else" brony-related, because there's no lily orchard- fuck i mentioned her again consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 11:03, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Typo

[edit]

In "2023-Present", there's a use of the word "enshiftification". The correct word which it links to and is quoted in the source is "enshittification". Could someone please change it? Thank you. ~2026-34787-70 (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done SomeContributorOnEarth (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fandom's MediaWiki Version was updated to 1.43.9

[edit]

https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Version LixieZixie (talk) 13:59, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply