Talk:Powerhouse Parramatta

Requested move 15 August 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:33, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

---

Parramatta Powerhouse → Powerhouse Parramatta – Official and secondary sources seem to use "Powerhouse" first, although I found one Sydney Morning Herald article using both inconsistently . Fork99 (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Support This article also uses both, but "Powerhouse Parramatta" more often [2] OdessaOdessa (talk) 07:02, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Museums and WikiProject Sydney have been notified of this discussion. Fork99 (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Support. Very easy decision, the proposed change simply rearranges the words, I doubt this would face major opposition. The proposed change is the WP:COMMONNAME that I have seen in sources and the terminology that I would use in personal conversations, the government and museum itself also officially uses this name. It is appropriate to keep both names as redirects though as it is a simple difference that can easily be made. Qwerty123M (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board has been notified of this discussion. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Architecture has been notified of this discussion. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:09, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.