Talk:Flightradar24
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flightradar24 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Flightradar24.com → Flightradar24 – I think name Flightradar24 (clear name, without domain name) is better. See inscription on their logo, and interwiki items for article in other languages. --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC) XXN (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support – per stab at WP:COMMONNAME. It'd be nice to have sources, too, but it would seem nobody is going to append ".com" in use because "Flightradar24" is apparently unique and thus sufficient. ENeville (talk) 17:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
SkyCards game
[edit]Flightradar24 published a mobile game called SkyCards in late 2024 - is that relevant to the article, can I add that? Snowiiiiie (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry I've only now checked the talk page. I included Skycards now, did the same on dewp, sorry, didn't want to take your idea away! AsepTisch (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- No, this doesn't belong; especially as is. It's not notable and sourced to Flightradar's blog. And, way too large, so it's also WP:UNDUE. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- The question was here for almost 3 months, not spoken against to? I miscalculated the length given the length of the whole article, I can see that. Since this is not my homewiki I will not make another try. AsepTisch (talk) 06:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ahh hi, I also just got back here! I've added it as one short sentence, I think that's a good compromise. I think it's of similar importance as the santa tracker (gimmicky, but the gimmickiness also illustrates the character of the website, doesn't it). You're right @AsepTisch, @Jauerback had enough time to just answer no :) Snowiiiiie (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- And, I've removed it again. This is nothing but a promtional piece for this game, even it's just mentioned as it's sourced to FlightRadar's blog. If you can find it in a reliable source, then we can consider adding it. Finally, there's no deadline or even a requirement to respond to any talk page question. Unless a specific user is pinged, it's not like every message on an article talk page even gets seen, so the expectation of "enough time" is ridiculous. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- That is fair! In the name of consistency, I've removed the other promo piece sourced to the blog as well. Snowiiiiie (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:10, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- That is fair! In the name of consistency, I've removed the other promo piece sourced to the blog as well. Snowiiiiie (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- And, I've removed it again. This is nothing but a promtional piece for this game, even it's just mentioned as it's sourced to FlightRadar's blog. If you can find it in a reliable source, then we can consider adding it. Finally, there's no deadline or even a requirement to respond to any talk page question. Unless a specific user is pinged, it's not like every message on an article talk page even gets seen, so the expectation of "enough time" is ridiculous. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- No, this doesn't belong; especially as is. It's not notable and sourced to Flightradar's blog. And, way too large, so it's also WP:UNDUE. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Need new heading for significantly tracked flights
[edit]They are currently under history, which it doesn't really fit under. Avdan747 (talk) 23:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
ADS-B 2019 Statistic
[edit]The statement that 60% of planes in the US have ADS-B is probably outdated. As of 2020, ADS-B is required for operations in class B, C, or D airspace. This includes all commercial airports, so it's unavoidable for airliners. Also most small planes have ADS-B or UAT. Let's see if we can find a more recent source or copy something from the articles on ADS-B and UAT. I will check the FAR/AIM when time allows. ~2026-34192-32 (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- Aviation articles needing images
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages


