This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Columbian exchange article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
The section is fully cited to reliable sources, and there is no mention nor suggestion of any land bridge. The evidence is that people arrived in the New World from the Old, however they may have travelled. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Astirmays. I think Chiswick Chap's objection to the addition was more consonant with its lack of sourcing rather than its importance. That said, I do agree that the effects of the guinea pig and domestic rabbit have had a rather minute effect on the Old World as compared to the influence of, say, cattle and chickens on the the New World. I would also like to apologize in advance for reverting your edit with a WP:NOTBROKEN tag; I misread your change by mistake. I still believe Chiswick Chap's choice of link is more appropriate, but I did want to apologize for citing the wrong policy in reverting you. Best, ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks both. We are obliged to stay with the sources, we can't make stuff up. That said, small domestic animals may be nice but perhaps didn't change whole cultures and civilisations, as the larger exchange certainly did. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:28, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@ThaesOfereode: I got it. However, it was not the wild turkey or the ocellated turkey that was introduced to the Old World (or only very marginally, without spreading or for some zoos), but the domestic turkey, which is raised there on a large scale, even if much less so than chicken. Hence my latest modification (links and image).
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In 2014, a more thorough genetic study of the calabash plant refuted the theory that it was brought over to the Americas by Paleolithic hunter-gatherers during the original settlement of the New World. See [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3939861/ Transoceanic drift and the domestication of African bottle gourds in the Americas]. Seems like we should remove this assertion.Glendoremus (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply