Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22604d79becd434

Jump to content

Species description

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Protologue)

A species description is a formal scientific description of a newly encountered species, typically articulated through a scientific publication. Its purpose is to provide a clear description of a new species of organism and explain how it differs from species that have been previously described or related species. For a species to be considered valid, a species description must follow established guidelines and naming conventions dictated by relevant nomenclature codes. These include the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) for animals, the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN) for plants, and the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) for viruses. A species description often includes photographs or other illustrations of type material and information regarding where this material is deposited. The publication in which the species is described gives the new species a formal scientific name. Some 1.9 million species have been identified and described, out of some 8.7 million that may actually exist.[1] Additionally, over five billion species have gone extinct over the history of life on Earth.[2]

Naming process

[edit source]

A name of a new species becomes valid (available in zoological terminology) with the date of publication of its formal scientific description. Once the scientist has performed the necessary research to determine that the discovered organism represents a new species, the scientific results are summarized in a scientific manuscript, either as part of a book or as a paper to be submitted to a scientific journal.

A scientific species description must fulfill several formal criteria specified by the nomenclature codes, e.g. selection of at least one type specimen. These criteria are intended to ensure that the species name is clear and unambiguous, for example, the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature states that "Authors should exercise reasonable care and consideration in forming new names to ensure that they are chosen with their subsequent users in mind and that, as far as possible, they are appropriate, compact, euphonious, memorable, and do not cause offence."[3]

Species names are written in the 26 letters of the Latin alphabet, but many species names are based on words from other languages, and are Latinized.

Once the manuscript has been accepted for publication,[4] the new species name is officially created.

Once a species name has been assigned and approved, it can generally not be changed except in the case of error. For example, a species of beetle (Anophthalmus hitleri) was named by a German collector after Adolf Hitler in 1933 when he had recently become chancellor of Germany.[5] It is not clear whether such a dedication would be considered acceptable or appropriate today, but the name remains in use.[5]

Species names have been chosen on many different bases. The most common is a naming for the species' external appearance, its origin, or the species name is a dedication to a certain person. Examples would include a bat species named for the two stripes on its back (Saccopteryx bilineata), a frog named for its Bolivian origin (Phyllomedusa boliviana), and an ant species dedicated to the actor Harrison Ford (Pheidole harrisonfordi). A scientific name in honor of a person or persons is known as a taxonomic eponym or eponymic; patronym and matronym are the gendered terms for this.[6][7]

A number of humorous species names also exist. Literary examples include the genus name Borogovia (an extinct dinosaur), which is named after the borogove, a mythical character from Lewis Carroll's poem "Jabberwocky". A second example, Macrocarpaea apparata (a tall plant) was named after the magical spell "to apparate" from the Harry Potter novels by J. K. Rowling, as it seemed to appear out of nowhere.[8] In 1975, the British naturalist Sir Peter Scott proposed the binomial name Nessiteras rhombopteryx ("Ness monster with diamond-shaped fin") for the Loch Ness Monster; it was soon spotted that it was an anagram of "monster hoax by Sir Peter S".

Recognizing benefactors through species naming

[edit source]

Species have frequently been named by scientists in recognition of supporters and benefactors. For example, the genus Victoria (a flowering waterplant) was named in honour of Queen Victoria of Great Britain. More recently, a species of lemur (Avahi cleesei) was named after the actor John Cleese in recognition of his work to publicize the plight of lemurs in Madagascar.

Non-profit ecological organizations may also allow benefactors to name new species in exchange for financial support for taxonomic research and nature conservation. A German non-profit organisation, BIOPAT – Patrons for Biodiversity, has raised more than $450,000 for research and conservation through sponsorship of over 100 species using this model.[9] An individual example of this system is the Plecturocebus aureipalatii (or "monkey of the Golden Palace"), which was named after the Golden Palace casino in recognition of a $650,000 contribution to the Madidi National Park in Bolivia in 2005.[10]

The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants discourages this practice somewhat: "Recommendation 20A. Authors forming generic names should comply with the following ... (h) Not dedicate genera to persons quite unconcerned with botany, mycology, phycology, or natural science in general."[11]

History

[edit source]
Original title page of Linnaeus's Systema Naturae, published in 1735

Early biologists often published entire volumes or multiple-volume works of descriptions in an attempt to catalog all known species. These catalogs typically featured extensive descriptions of each species and were often illustrated upon reprinting.

The first of these large catalogs was Aristotle's History of Animals, published around 343 BC. Aristotle included descriptions of creatures, mostly fish and invertebrates, in his homeland, and several mythological creatures rumored to live in far-away lands, such as the manticore.

In 77 AD Pliny the Elder dedicated several volumes of his Natural History to the description of all life forms he knew to exist. He appears to have read Aristotle's work since he writes about many of the same far-away mythological creatures.

Toward the end of the 12th century, Konungs skuggsjá, an Old Norse philosophical didactic work, featured several descriptions of the whales, seals, and monsters of the Icelandic seas. These descriptions were brief and often erroneous, and they included a description of the mermaid and a rare island-like sea monster called hafgufu. The author was hesitant to mention the beast (known today to be fictitious) for fear of its size, but felt it was important enough to be included in his descriptions.[12]

However, the earliest recognized species authority is Carl Linnaeus, who standardized the modern taxonomy system beginning with his Systema Naturae in 1735.[13]

As the catalog of known species was increasing rapidly, it became impractical to maintain a single work documenting every species. Publishing a paper documenting a single species was much faster and could be done by scientists with less broadened scopes of study. For example, a scientist who discovered a new species of insect would not need to understand plants, or frogs, or even insects which did not resemble the species, but would only need to understand closely related insects.

Modern differences

[edit source]

Formal species descriptions today follow strict guidelines set forth by the codes of nomenclature. Very detailed formal descriptions are made by scientists, who usually study the organism closely for a considerable time. A diagnosis may be used instead of,[14] or as well as[15] the description. A diagnosis specifies the distinction between the new species and other species, and it does not necessarily have to be based on morphology.[16] In recent times, new species descriptions have been made without voucher specimens, and this has been controversial.[17]

Statistics

[edit source]

Analysis of species databases reveals that new species descriptions is increasing and currently at an all-time peak[18]

YearTotal new species descriptionsAnimalsPlantsFungi ProtistsChromistaBacteriaArcheaCumulative species descriptions
192096856693208685524180229280
19218915609218668361210360232103
1922110687698227480215268101235473
19239910690222465776161180238481
192411173791422369101982120241740
1925110948215199578598370244619
1926119009054168295610180180247465
192710957809918917908158110250323
192811499836720538417211200253455
192911144771925745112830390256880
193010275761217365828326110259543
193111286799120938951129042262838
193211225808521786102032390265978
19339811729717255372236140268492
1934115658047208312764136190272010
193511018826719985049216240274761
1936115538280260853412108101278034
193710280755820345492126110280756
19381155490081795626111680283302
1939109538152187381559990286103
194010027730819485975154141288822
1941856963071475696863200291084
1942737353331607372447100293124
194360014400117836745020294725
1944530537541086383068140296276
19454669332476552524940297621
194647853471777479143770298935
19475786404884780047872300673
19486006413711046172135110302542
194970915201137044636380304432
19508574574218657286218150307264
19519093664615327354162131309711
1952908768801210892280230311918
1953896265121566772281290314368
19549334708311479098170170316619
1955979375121255907979310318900
19569779792310936361581310320756
195794707033135782416150900323193
19589956763614167409119351325513
1959974276729521020860300327583
1960103387963127489912157330329958
196199437528131990323135350332373
1962107778709110277115143370334441
196310094781313088351080480336722
196411004851713469921891400339209
1965117099356136980515122420341562
196610144769814958121781410344008
196711106886813217873070300346246
1968120459654128493345102261348637
196910149790012878111786480350886
1970105788458113280228107501353006
1971111338856110810402762400355283
19721178486561807116521103302358411
1973111308782128790718102340360759
197411114872114327852186681363152
19751105180531379116633382362366150
197610270788214497983471360368538
19771340090291558973661752211372909
197811552854020398232784390375921
19791278996711839103647161341379039
198012353896922759613090262382423
1981130039634187882246554645385792
198212255909321738402055713388954
19831336899832016112949821009392339
19841253195311995756311248311395339
1985122729159204185224881026398452
1986137241032621321003481119212401850
19871354810175210110912978722405223
198813714102772127960272179313408660
198912970909121921432311199411412539
19901335010019216791555949010415870
199113051972923258082986695419192
1992129701018918597452767812421973
19931386910608204997923941133425234
19941361410633173196926162885428215
199513293100272064905321231366431481
199612729917422371097353813711435036
19971302695272065117214741659438535
199813749105681994949273915418441716
19991317696592233983236919712445233
2000133011018416531135356821016448350
2001135449834214611561513224516452060
20021430710908183810562319027517455459
200313611100591904124530503167459011
2004148201100720351335184237211462824
20051335398961966908297246616466281
2006147031085021821063214852415470134
2007150441078622571343225355825474392
2008151781111021131317225754217478460
2009155341112622781437235260711482868
2010151151112322041140274655421486860
2011159781190521001327194455924490933
2012156261085223941699253860612495707
2013152811029024601645263679925500698
2014156071050524651810262273841505800
2015167981105627741967163591238511542
2016164291009825682722184295922517873
2017166171057127272551114769614523919
2018154069910294124522629480529415
2019138698952251123332418301534332
20201704410936271431279162420540440

See also

[edit source]

References

[edit source]
  1. Mora, C.; et al. (23 August 2011). "How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?". PLOS Biology. 9 (8) e1001127. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127. PMC 3160336. PMID 21886479.
  2. McKinney, Michael L. (1997). "How do rare species avoid extinction? A paleontological view". In Kunin, W. E.; Gaston, K. J. (eds.). The Biology of Rarity. pp. 110–129. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5874-9_7. ISBN 978-94-010-6483-5. Archived from the original on 3 February 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  3. "International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Recommendation 25C". Archived from the original on 8 June 2011. Retrieved 18 June 2011.
  4. One example of an abstract of an article naming a new species can be found at Wellner, S.; Lodders, N.; Kampfer, P. (13 June 2011). "Methylobacterium cerastii sp. nov., isolated from the leaf surface of Cerastium holosteoides". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 62 (Pt 4): 917–924. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.030767-0. PMID 21669927.
  5. 1 2 George, Rose (13 April 2002). "A beetle called Hitler". Rose George. Archived from the original on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2015.
  6. Capinera, John L., ed. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. p. 2765. ISBN 978-1-4020-6242-1.
  7. Strahan, Ronald; Conder, Pamela, eds. (2007). Dictionary of Australian and New Guinean Mammals. Collingwood, Victoria: Csiro Publishing. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-643-10006-0.
  8. "Curiosities of Biological Nomenclature". Archived from the original on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 18 June 2011.
  9. "Financing conservation efforts by selling naming rights of new species". Archived from the original on 16 January 2012. Retrieved 18 June 2011.
  10. "Internet casino buys monkey naming rights". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  11. (McNeill et al. 2012)
  12. Keyser, Rudolph; Munch, Peter Andreas; Unger, Carl Rikard (1848). Konungs skuggsjá (in Norwegian).
  13. Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systema Naturae.
  14. (McNeill et al. 2012, Article 38)
  15. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999). "International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition, adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 10 February 2014. article 13
  16. Lawley, Jonathan W.; Gamero-Mora, Edgar; Maronna, Maximiliano M.; Chiaverano, Luciano M.; Stampar, Sérgio N.; Hopcroft, Russell R.; Collins, Allen G.; Morandini, André C. (29 September 2022). "Morphology is not always useful for diagnosis, and that's ok: Species hypotheses should not be bound to a class of data. Reply to Brown and Gibbons (S Afr J Sci. 2022;118(9/10), Art. #12590)" (PDF). South African Journal of Science. 118 (9/10). doi:10.17159/sajs.2022/14495. ISSN 1996-7489. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2025. Retrieved 21 April 2025.
  17. Kannan, Ragupathy (2007). New Bird Descriptions Without Proper Voucher Specimens: Reflections After the Bugun Liocichla Case. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 104: 12–18. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/154730#/summary Archived 3 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine
  18. Li, Xin; Yang, Ding; Wang, Liang; Wiens, John J. (5 December 2025). "The past and future of known biodiversity: Rates, patterns, and projections of new species over time". Science Advances. 11 (49). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz3071. Retrieved 28 July 2026.

Bibliography

[edit source]

Other sources

[edit source]
  • Winston, Judith E. 1999. Describing Species: Practical Taxonomic Procedure For Biologists. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-06824-7
[edit source]
  • Wikisource logo Works related to descriptions of new species at Wikisource