Nonlinear photonic crystal
Nonlinear photonic crystals are usually used as quasi-phase-matching materials. They can be one-dimensional,[1] two-dimensional[2] or three-dimensional.[3]
Nonlinear Photonic Crystals
[edit source]Broadly speaking, nonlinear photonic crystals (PC) are periodic structures whose optical response depends on the intensity of the optical field that propagates into the crystal. An immediate consequence is that such structures have new optical properties with improved or new functionalities that cannot be obtained by using their linear counterpart, namely linear pPCs. One such example is optical tunability, that is, optical control of the response of devices based on PC. Although tunability of optical properties of photonic crystals can be achieved, for instance, by applying an electric field to an inverse opal PC infiltrated with nematic liquid crystal, by modulating the PC's index of refraction through the electro-optic effect induced by an external electric field, or through temperature-induced changes in the PC's index of refraction, high-speed operability desired for certain advanced optical communication systems can be obtained only if intrinsic optical nonlinearities in the PC material are employed. The reason for this is the ultra-fast response of certain nonlinear dielelectric materials to optical fields. In contrast to the now very extensive body of research in the properties and devices in linear photonic crystals, research into the theoretical and experimental behavior of these structures under conditions of intense optical fields, e.g. in the nonlinear regime, is still in its formative stages.
The index of refraction of a nonlinear crystal changes in response to an applied electromagnetic field. Some of the characteristics of nonlinear crystals used to generate entangled photons include:
- Nonlinearity: The refractive index of the crystal changes with the intensity of the incident light. This is known as the nonlinear optical response.
- Periodicity: The crystal has a regular, repeating structure. This is known as the lattice structure, which is responsible for the regular arrangement of the atoms in the crystal.
- Optical anisotropy: The crystal has different refractive indices along different crystallographic axes.
- Temperature and pressure sensitivity: The nonlinearity of the crystal can change with temperature and pressure, and thus the crystal should be kept in a stable temperature and pressure environment.
- High nonlinear coefficient: a large nonlinear coefficient is desirable, this allows generation a high number of entangled photons.
- High optical damage threshold: Crystal with high optical damage threshold can endure high intensity of the pumping beam.
- Transparency in the desired wavelength range: It is important for the crystal to be transparent in the wavelength range of the pump beam for efficient nonlinear interactions
- High optical quality and low absorption: The crystal should be high optical quality and low absorption to minimize loss of the pump beam and the generated entangled photons.
Terminology and scope
[edit source]The term nonlinear photonic crystal is used in two related senses. In the narrower and historically dominant sense, it denotes a material in which one or more components of the nonlinear susceptibility, most commonly the second-order susceptibility , are patterned periodically or quasiperiodically while the linear refractive index may remain nearly uniform. The patterned susceptibility supplies reciprocal-lattice vectors for quasi-phase-matching and can control the direction, polarization and spatial mode of newly generated light.[4]
In a broader usage, the term includes conventional photonic crystal waveguides and nanocavities fabricated from materials with an intensity-dependent optical response. In these devices, periodic modulation of the linear dielectric function creates bands, slow-light modes or resonances, while Kerr, free-carrier, thermo-optic or absorptive nonlinearities alter propagation or cavity transmission.[5] These two usages share periodic optical engineering but should not be treated as identical: a susceptibility grating may have little linear-index contrast, whereas a nonlinear photonic-crystal waveguide can have a strong linear photonic band structure without a deliberately patterned nonlinear coefficient.[4]
Reciprocal-space description
[edit source]For a three-wave interaction with wavevectors , and , the phase mismatch can be written as
In a nonlinear photonic crystal, a reciprocal-lattice vector produced by the susceptibility pattern can compensate the mismatch:
The same principle applies to second-harmonic generation, sum- and difference-frequency generation, optical parametric processes and, with an appropriate nonlinear grating, selected third-order processes. The magnitude and direction of the available reciprocal vectors are determined by the lattice period, symmetry, duty cycle and dimensionality.[6][7]
The reciprocal-space construction is sometimes described with a nonlinear Ewald diagram. Unlike birefringent phase matching, quasi-phase matching does not require the interacting waves to occupy natural propagation directions selected solely by the linear refractive-index ellipsoid. It can therefore permit collinear interactions, use of a larger nonlinear-tensor coefficient, and simultaneous satisfaction of more than one phase-matching condition.[4]
One-dimensional susceptibility gratings
[edit source]One-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals include periodically poled ferroelectrics, orientation-patterned semiconductors and layered structures in which the sign or magnitude of a nonlinear coefficient varies along one coordinate. Periodic inversion of ferroelectric domains reverses selected components of and resets the relative phase of interacting waves before energy begins to flow back toward the pump.[8]
The Fourier spectrum of a rectangular domain pattern contains multiple grating orders. First-order quasi-phase matching generally provides the largest effective nonlinear coefficient, while higher orders can satisfy interactions requiring shorter effective periods at reduced efficiency. Aperiodic, phase-reversed and superlattice patterns are designed so that several Fourier components satisfy different phase-matching conditions.[7]
Quasiperiodic optical superlattices have been used to phase match cascaded second- and sum-frequency generation for direct third-harmonic generation.[9] Chirped gratings vary their local period along propagation and can broaden the acceptance bandwidth or impose a designed spectral phase on the converted field.
Two-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals
[edit source]Two-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals provide reciprocal vectors in a plane. This permits non-collinear conversion, simultaneous generation into several directions and phase matching of several processes in a single patterned region. The first widely cited experimental two-dimensional example was hexagonally poled lithium niobate, in which the second-order susceptibility was periodically inverted while the linear index remained approximately unchanged. External second-harmonic conversion efficiencies above 60% were reported with picosecond pulses.[10]
Lattice symmetry determines the set of equivalent conversion directions. Square, rectangular, hexagonal, annular and computer-generated patterns have been used to select output angles, polarization combinations and generated spatial modes. Because multiple reciprocal vectors may have comparable Fourier weight, two-dimensional structures can serve simultaneously as frequency converters and beam splitters.[4]
Quasiperiodic and aperiodic structures
[edit source]A nonlinear photonic quasicrystal has long-range order without ordinary translational periodicity. Its reciprocal spectrum can contain many independently selectable vectors, enabling simultaneous phase matching of nonlinear processes that cannot all be satisfied by a simple periodic lattice. A general reciprocal-space design method was demonstrated for nonlinear photonic quasicrystals and applied to simultaneous frequency-conversion objectives.[11]
Aperiodic designs can be synthesized by optimizing domain boundaries or Fourier coefficients for target wavelengths, bandwidths and relative conversion efficiencies. This approach is used when a single uniform period cannot accommodate the required dispersion or when several output channels must be generated with controlled relative strength.[7]
Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals
[edit source]Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals provide reciprocal vectors with components along all three spatial axes. They can therefore combine quasi-phase matching with three-dimensional wavefront shaping and reduce restrictions on propagation direction and polarization that remain in one- and two-dimensional patterns.[4]
A three-dimensional lithium-niobate nonlinear photonic crystal was demonstrated by using focused femtosecond-laser pulses to locally suppress the second-order nonlinear coefficient. The written volume produced second-harmonic conversion with an effective efficiency comparable to conventional quasi-phase-matched structures.[12]
Three-dimensional domain inversion has also been produced in calcium barium niobate and related ferroelectrics by focused optical poling. Independent nonlinear gratings placed at different depths enabled switchable generation of Gaussian, vortex and conical second-harmonic beams.[13]
Naturally formed three-dimensional ferroelectric-domain arrangements have been observed in potassium–tantalate–niobate near its Curie temperature. The rotating domain distribution supplied reciprocal vectors in multiple directions and supported broadband second-harmonic generation without externally written periodic poling.[14]
Fabrication methods
[edit source]Electric-field poling
[edit source]Electric-field poling is widely used for lithium niobate, lithium tantalate and potassium titanyl phosphate. Patterned electrodes apply fields above the ferroelectric coercive field to reverse domains in selected regions. Period, duty cycle, crystal thickness, electrode geometry and pulse waveform affect domain nucleation and growth. Over-poling can merge neighboring domains, while incomplete inversion reduces the Fourier component responsible for quasi-phase matching.
Optical and femtosecond-laser writing
[edit source]Focused light can modify or invert ferroelectric domains and can locally suppress nonlinear susceptibility without necessarily producing a large linear-index change. Femtosecond-laser writing has enabled buried three-dimensional patterns inaccessible to planar electrodes.[12][13] The method offers three-dimensional flexibility but must control focal elongation, spherical aberration, heat accumulation and unintended modification of linear loss.
Orientation-patterned and layered materials
[edit source]In non-ferroelectric semiconductors, the sign of selected nonlinear tensor elements can be reversed by rotating crystal orientation between adjacent domains. Orientation-patterned gallium arsenide and gallium phosphide are used for mid-infrared generation because of their large nonlinear coefficients and broad transparency. Layer stacking can similarly reverse or rotate nonlinear susceptibility without electric-field domain inversion.
In 2024, quasi-phase matching was demonstrated through rotational stacking of non-centrosymmetric 3R molybdenum disulfide layers, extending the concept of susceptibility engineering to van der Waals materials.[15]
Domain and nonlinear-structure characterization
[edit source]Ferroelectric domain structures are characterized using selective chemical etching, optical microscopy, piezoresponse-force microscopy, second-harmonic microscopy and nonlinear diffraction. Linear microscopy can reveal topography or refractive-index modification but does not always determine the sign and magnitude of the nonlinear coefficient.
Second-harmonic microscopy maps regions that retain nonlinear susceptibility, while nonlinear diffraction measures the reciprocal-space distribution of the susceptibility lattice. Comparing measured diffraction orders with the Fourier transform of the intended pattern can identify duty-cycle error, domain-wall roughness and incomplete three-dimensional writing.[4]
Second-order frequency conversion
[edit source]Second-order nonlinear photonic crystals are used for second-harmonic generation, sum-frequency generation, difference-frequency generation, optical parametric amplification, optical parametric oscillation and spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Energy conservation fixes the participating frequencies, while the nonlinear lattice supplies momentum compensation.
Conversion efficiency depends on the nonlinear tensor coefficient, modal overlap, interaction length, pump intensity, propagation loss and the Fourier coefficient of the selected grating vector. Temperature and wavelength tuning change the material dispersion and therefore shift the quasi-phase-matching condition.
Multistep and cascaded interactions
[edit source]One susceptibility pattern can contain reciprocal vectors that simultaneously phase match sequential processes. Examples include second-harmonic generation followed by sum-frequency generation to produce a third harmonic, or two second-order steps whose effective response resembles a third-order nonlinearity.[7][9]
Cascaded interactions can generate several colors, transfer orbital angular momentum and create effective self-focusing or self-defocusing phase shifts. Because intermediate waves participate in later steps, the output depends on relative phase, depletion and spatial overlap rather than on independent single-process efficiencies.
Broadband and chirped conversion
[edit source]Uniform periodic gratings have finite spectral and angular acceptance. Chirped nonlinear photonic crystals vary the grating vector along propagation so that different positions satisfy quasi-phase matching for different frequencies. They are used for broadband harmonic generation, parametric amplification, pulse compression and spectral shaping.
A chirped periodically poled lithium-niobate structure has supported simultaneous broadband second- and third-harmonic generation through multiple quasi-phase-matching orders.[16]
Broadband conversion can trade peak efficiency for bandwidth and can introduce spectral phase that must be compensated in ultrashort-pulse applications. Fabrication errors in the local period map directly into spectral ripple and phase error.
Nonlinear beam shaping
[edit source]The transverse structure of a nonlinear susceptibility pattern determines the phase and amplitude of the generated field. Nonlinear photonic crystals have therefore been used to produce focused beams, multiple beams, Bessel-like beams, vortex beams and Hermite–Gaussian modes at a converted frequency.
Three-dimensional lithium-niobate patterns have combined quasi-phase matching and wavefront shaping in the same volume. Compared with two-dimensional structures that shape the output without complete longitudinal phase matching, three-dimensional modulation increased conversion efficiency by up to two orders of magnitude in reported experiments.[17]
Nonlinear holography and multiplexing
[edit source]In nonlinear holography, the susceptibility distribution encodes a target wavefront that is reconstructed at a generated frequency rather than at the illumination frequency. The grating must provide both the local phase required for the holographic image and a reciprocal vector that satisfies the nonlinear momentum condition.
A three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal has been used for quasi-phase-matching-division multiplexing holography. Different reconstructed second-harmonic images were associated with different reciprocal-space shells and could be selected by changing the quasi-phase-matching condition.[18]
Nonlinear diffraction and Talbot effects
[edit source]When a pump illuminates a transverse susceptibility lattice, the generated harmonic can appear in multiple nonlinear Raman–Nath or Bragg diffraction orders. The angular distribution measures the reciprocal lattice and can also create structured output beams.
The nonlinear Talbot effect is the periodic reconstruction of a susceptibility pattern in a generated nonlinear field. It differs from the ordinary Talbot effect because the source distribution is created by nonlinear polarization. Experimental work has demonstrated self-imaging and frequency-converted pattern reconstruction from nonlinear photonic crystals.[19]
Photonic-crystal waveguides and slow light
[edit source]In photonic-crystal waveguides, operation near a band edge reduces group velocity and increases optical energy density. This can enhance Kerr nonlinearity, two-photon absorption, free-carrier effects and four-wave mixing over a short physical length. The enhancement is accompanied by stronger sensitivity to dispersion, fabrication disorder and scattering loss.[20]
Dispersion engineering is used to obtain a region with large but comparatively flat group index. Four-wave mixing in slow-light silicon photonic-crystal waveguides has shown increased conversion efficiency, while multiphoton absorption and free carriers impose power-dependent limits.[21]
Photonic-crystal nanocavities
[edit source]A defect in a photonic crystal can localize an optical mode with small volume and high quality factor. The resulting field buildup lowers the energy required to shift the resonance through Kerr, carrier or thermo-optic effects. Cavity enhancement is used for harmonic generation, parametric conversion, optical switching and emitter–photon interaction.
Photonic-crystal nanocavities containing InGaAsP have demonstrated all-optical switching energies as low as 0.42 femtojoules with switching times of tens of picoseconds.[22]
High-Q lithium-niobate photonic-crystal slab resonators combine second-order nonlinearity, electro-optic response and tight confinement. Reported devices have supported second- and third-harmonic generation and anisotropic photorefractive and thermo-optic responses.[23]
Optical bistability and switching
[edit source]Optical bistability occurs when feedback between cavity intensity and an intensity-dependent refractive index produces two stable output states for the same input power. In photonic-crystal cavities, the responsible response can be electronic Kerr refraction, free-carrier dispersion, thermal shift or a combination of mechanisms.
Bistable devices can function as optical gates, latches and memories, but the apparent switching time depends on the slowest relevant process. Kerr nonlinearity can respond on electronic timescales, whereas carrier recombination and heat diffusion produce longer recovery and pattern-dependent behavior. Low switching energy therefore does not necessarily imply high repetition rate.
Quantum-light generation
[edit source]Nonlinear photonic crystals are used to generate correlated and entangled photons through spontaneous parametric down-conversion and spontaneous four-wave mixing. Susceptibility engineering controls momentum correlations, emission direction, bandwidth and spatial mode. A monolithic quadratic nonlinear photonic crystal has generated steerable path-entangled states by combining pair generation and spatial beam splitting in one patterned crystal.[24]
Slow-light photonic-crystal structures can enhance spontaneous four-wave mixing. A silicon coupled-resonator optical waveguide formed from photonic-crystal cavities has generated high-dimensional time-bin entangled photon pairs at telecommunications wavelengths.[25]
Quantum-source performance is evaluated through pair-generation rate, heralding efficiency, spectral purity, indistinguishability, coincidence-to-accidental ratio and entanglement visibility. Resonant and slow-light enhancement can increase brightness but narrows bandwidth and increases sensitivity to loss and fabrication variation.[26]
Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces
[edit source]Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces use subwavelength resonators to control the phase, polarization and amplitude of generated light. Unlike bulk susceptibility gratings, they are optically thin and frequently rely on resonant enhancement within individual nanoantennas. They can implement nonlinear lenses, holograms, beam deflectors and polarization converters.[27]
Metasurface-based nonlinear photonic crystals can encode geometric phase or resonator orientation rather than ferroelectric-domain sign. Their efficiency is limited by nanoscale material volume, absorption, fabrication disorder and the spectral bandwidth of the resonance.
Materials platforms
[edit source]Ferroelectric oxides
[edit source]Lithium niobate is the most common nonlinear-photonic-crystal material because it combines strong second-order nonlinearity, a broad transparency range, electro-optic response and established domain-inversion methods. Lithium tantalate, potassium titanyl phosphate, barium calcium titanate, calcium barium niobate and potassium–tantalate–niobate provide alternative coercive fields, tensor coefficients, transparency ranges and domain behavior.[4]
III–V semiconductors
[edit source]Gallium arsenide, gallium phosphide, aluminum gallium arsenide and indium gallium phosphide provide large second-order and third-order nonlinearities. Orientation patterning or modal phase matching is used because these materials are not conventionally periodically poled. Their direct or indirect band structure and two-photon-absorption edge determine useful wavelength ranges.
Silicon and silicon nitride
[edit source]Silicon has strong third-order nonlinearity and a mature fabrication platform, but it is centrosymmetric in the bulk and exhibits two-photon absorption near telecommunications wavelengths. Silicon nitride offers lower Kerr nonlinearity but lower nonlinear absorption and broad transparency. Photonic-crystal waveguides and cavities compensate for weaker material response through slow light and resonant field enhancement.
Chalcogenide and hybrid materials
[edit source]Chalcogenide glasses provide high Kerr nonlinearity and broad infrared transparency. Hybrid photonic crystals place graphene, organic electro-optic materials, quantum dots, two-dimensional semiconductors or phase-change materials at field maxima to add tunability, absorption, gain or nonvolatile switching.
Integrated and reconfigurable quasi-phase matching
[edit source]Integrated waveguides use both material patterning and geometry to satisfy momentum conservation. Periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate combines strong confinement with quasi-phase matching, while silicon devices can induce an effective second-order response or nonlinear grating through electric fields, strain, carrier distributions or optical programming.
An optically written space-charge grating has enabled reconfigurable quasi-phase matching for second-harmonic generation in silicon nitride waveguides. The grating was formed by coherent photogalvanic effects and could adapt to changes in pump wavelength and device dispersion.[28]
Dynamic and programmable quasi-phase-matching approaches seek to replace a permanently fabricated lattice with a controllable optical, electrical or thermal modulation. Such methods can compensate fabrication error or retarget a device to different wavelength combinations, but require a stable control pattern and can introduce additional loss or power consumption.
Performance metrics
[edit source]Important performance measures include normalized conversion efficiency, absolute output power, pump depletion, acceptance bandwidth, angular acceptance, temperature tolerance, polarization dependence, propagation loss, optical-damage threshold and fabrication yield. For quantum sources, coincidence statistics and state fidelity are also required.
A large nonlinear coefficient alone does not guarantee high device efficiency. The interacting fields must overlap spatially, remain phase matched and avoid absorption. In resonant systems, the loaded quality factors and coupling conditions at all participating frequencies determine field buildup and extraction.
The Fourier coefficient of the chosen susceptibility grating sets an upper bound on its effective nonlinear coefficient. Duty-cycle errors, domain-wall roughness and incomplete inversion transfer power into unwanted reciprocal vectors and reduce the desired interaction.
Limitations and engineering trade-offs
[edit source]Susceptibility-patterned devices are sensitive to fabrication error because the domain period can be comparable to the nonlinear coherence length. Errors accumulate over long devices and can broaden or split the conversion spectrum. Three-dimensional writing adds flexibility but is slower and can introduce linear scattering or focal distortion.
Slow-light and resonant enhancement reduce required device length or pump power, but increase sensitivity to wavelength, temperature and disorder. High group index can also increase backscattering and propagation loss. Nanocavities provide large field enhancement over narrow bandwidths and require alignment of multiple resonances for some nonlinear processes.
Thermal drift, photorefraction, free carriers and nonlinear absorption can shift the phase-matching condition during operation. These effects may be useful for switching but can destabilize frequency conversion. Practical designs therefore balance conversion efficiency against bandwidth, stability, damage threshold and control complexity.
Applications
[edit source]Nonlinear photonic crystals are used or investigated for:
- wavelength conversion and tunable coherent sources;
- optical parametric generation and amplification;
- generation of ultraviolet, visible, infrared and terahertz radiation;
- structured-light and orbital-angular-momentum generation;
- nonlinear holography and wavelength-converting displays;
- all-optical switching, logic and memory;
- spectroscopy and frequency metrology;
- entangled-photon and heralded-single-photon sources;
- integrated quantum photonics;
- optical communication and signal regeneration; and
- nonlinear microscopy and imaging.
Emerging directions
[edit source]Recent work emphasizes three-dimensional susceptibility engineering, inverse-designed nonlinear lattices, thin-film ferroelectric integration, van der Waals stacking, bound-state-in-the-continuum enhancement and reconfigurable quasi-phase matching. These approaches seek to control frequency, momentum, polarization and spatial mode within a single device.
Three-dimensional structures permit several independent gratings to occupy different depths, enabling multiplexed or dynamically selected nonlinear functions.[13][18] Inverse design may optimize a continuous nonlinear-coefficient distribution rather than selecting a conventional periodic lattice, although fabrication constraints and source-selection bias must be included in the optimization.
Programmable nonlinear circuits are also being investigated for quantum and neuromorphic photonics. Their system-level usefulness will depend on low-loss coupling, stable phase control, scalable fabrication and whether converted or nonlinear signals retain sufficient power and coherence for subsequent stages.
References
[edit source]- ↑ J.A. Armstrong; N. Bloembergen; J. Ducuing; P.S. Pershan (1962). "Interaction between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric". Physical Review. 127 (6): 1918. Bibcode:1962PhRv..127.1918A. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.127.1918.
- ↑ V. Berger (1998). "Nonlinear photonic crystals". Physical Review Letters. 81 (19): 4136–4139. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.4136B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4136.
- ↑ T. Xu; K. Switkowski; X. Chen; S. Liu; K. Koynov; H. Yu; H. Zhang; J. Wang; y. Sheng; W. Krolikowski (2018). "Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal in ferroelectric barium calcium titanate". Nature Photonics. 12 (10): 591–595. Bibcode:2018NaPho..12..591X. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0225-1. S2CID 125827524.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zhang, Yong; Wang, Chaowei; Hu, Yanlei; et al. (2021). "Nonlinear photonic crystals: from 2D to 3D". Optica. 8 (3): 372–381. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.416619.
- ↑ Soljačić, Marin; Joannopoulos, J. D. (2004). "Enhancement of nonlinear effects using photonic crystals". Nature Materials. 3 (4): 211–219. Bibcode:2004NatMa...3..211S. doi:10.1038/nmat1097. PMID 15034554.
- ↑ Berger, V. (1998). "Nonlinear photonic crystals". Physical Review Letters. 81 (19): 4136–4139. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.4136B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4136.
- 1 2 3 4 Saltiel, Solomon M.; Sukhorukov, Andrey A.; Kivshar, Yuri S. (2005). "Multistep parametric processes in nonlinear optics". In Wolf, Emil (ed.). Progress in Optics. Vol. 47. Elsevier. pp. 1–73. doi:10.1016/S0079-6638(05)47001-8. ISBN 978-0-444-51598-8.
- ↑ Armstrong, J. A.; Bloembergen, N.; Ducuing, J.; Pershan, P. S. (1962). "Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric". Physical Review. 127 (6): 1918–1939. Bibcode:1962PhRv..127.1918A. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.127.1918.
- 1 2 Zhu, S. N.; Zhu, Y. Y.; Ming, N. B. (1997). "Quasi-phase-matched third-harmonic generation in a quasi-periodic optical superlattice". Science. 278 (5339): 843–846. Bibcode:1997Sci...278..843Z. doi:10.1126/science.278.5339.843.
- ↑ Broderick, Neil G. R.; Ross, Graeme W.; Offerhaus, Herman L.; Richardson, David J.; Hanna, David C. (2000). "Hexagonally poled lithium niobate: a two-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal". Physical Review Letters. 84 (19): 4345–4348. Bibcode:2000PhRvL..84.4345B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4345. PMID 10990682.
- ↑ Lifshitz, Ron; Arie, Adi; Bahabad, Alon (2005). "Photonic quasicrystals for nonlinear optical frequency conversion". Physical Review Letters. 95 (13) 133901. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95m3901L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.133901. PMID 16197167.
- 1 2 Wei, Dunzhao; Wang, Chaowei; Wang, Hongjun; et al. (2018). "Experimental demonstration of a three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystal". Nature Photonics. 12 (10): 596–600. Bibcode:2018NaPho..12..596W. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0240-2.
- 1 2 3 Liu, Sheng; Switkowski, Krzysztof; Xu, Chenglong; et al. (2019). "Nonlinear wavefront shaping with optically induced three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals". Nature Communications. 10 3208. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11114-y. PMC 6639368. PMID 31320626.
- ↑ Li, Chang; Wang, Xuping; Wu, Yang; et al. (2020). "Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal in naturally grown potassium–tantalate–niobate perovskite ferroelectrics". Light: Science & Applications. 9 193. doi:10.1038/s41377-020-00427-z. PMC 7691233. PMID 33250619.
- ↑ Tang, Yilin; Sripathy, Kabilan; Qin, Hao; et al. (2024). "Quasi-phase matching enabled by van der Waals stacking". Nature Communications. 15 9979. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53472-2.
- ↑ Chen, Bang-Qing; Zhang, Chun; Zhang, Yong; et al. (2014). "Simultaneous broadband generation of second and third harmonics from chirped periodically poled lithium niobate". Light: Science & Applications. 3 e189. doi:10.1038/lsa.2014.70.
- ↑ Wei, Dunzhao; Wang, Chaowei; Xu, Xiaoyi; et al. (2019). "Efficient nonlinear beam shaping in three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystals". Nature Communications. 10 4193. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12251-0. PMC 6744429. PMID 31527668.
- 1 2 Chen, Pengcheng; Wang, Chaowei; Wei, Dunzhao; et al. (2021). "Quasi-phase-matching-division multiplexing holography in a three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal". Light: Science & Applications. 10 146. doi:10.1038/s41377-021-00588-5. PMC 8282809. PMID 34282159.
- ↑ Zhang, Yiqi; Wen, Jianming; Zhu, Shining N.; Xiao, Min (2010). "Nonlinear Talbot effect". Physical Review Letters. 104 (18) 183901. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104r3901Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.183901. PMID 20482219.
- ↑ Monat, Christelle; Corcoran, Bill; Pudo, Dominik; et al. (2010). "Slow light enhanced nonlinear optics in silicon photonic crystal waveguides". IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 16 (1): 344–356. doi:10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2030643.
- ↑ Li, J.; O'Faolain, L.; Rey, I. H.; Krauss, T. F. (2011). "Four-wave mixing in photonic crystal waveguides: slow light enhancement and limitations". Optics Express. 19 (5): 4458–4463. Bibcode:2011OExpr..19.4458L. doi:10.1364/OE.19.004458. PMID 21369217.
- ↑ Nozaki, Kengo; Tanabe, Takasumi; Shinya, Akihiko; et al. (2010). "Sub-femtojoule all-optical switching using a photonic-crystal nanocavity". Nature Photonics. 4: 477–483. Bibcode:2010NaPho...4..477N. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.89.
- ↑ Li, Mingxiao; Liang, Hanxiao; Luo, Rui; et al. (2019). "High-Q two-dimensional lithium niobate photonic crystal slab nanoresonators". Optica. 6 (7): 860–866. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.6.000860.
- ↑ Jin, Hong; Xu, Peng; Luo, Xiao-Wei; et al. (2013). "Compact engineering of path-entangled sources from a monolithic quadratic nonlinear photonic crystal". Physical Review Letters. 111 (2) 023603. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111b3603J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.023603. PMID 23889400.
- ↑ Takesue, Hiroki; Matsuda, Nobuyuki; Kuramochi, Eiichi; et al. (2014). "Entangled photons from on-chip slow light". Scientific Reports. 4 3913. doi:10.1038/srep03913. PMC 3903069. PMID 24463474.
- ↑ Caspani, Lucia; Xiong, Chunle; Eggleton, Benjamin J.; et al. (2017). "Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics". Light: Science & Applications. 6 e17100. doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.100. PMC 6054020. PMID 30167248.
- ↑ Li, Guixin; Zhang, Shuang; Zentgraf, Thomas (2017). "Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces". Nature Reviews Materials. 2 17010. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.10.
- ↑ Nitiss, E.; Hu, J.; Stroganov, A.; et al. (2022). "Optically reconfigurable quasi-phase-matching in silicon nitride microresonators". Nature Photonics. 16: 134–141. doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00925-5.