Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a290dd41eed13401

Jump to content

Geometrical thickness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Geometrically-thin)

In accretion disk physics, geometrical thickness is a property of an accretion disk representing the relative vertical scale height (thickness) of the disk. Disks can be categorized as geometrically thin, slim, or thick. Thicker disks have higher mass accretion rates than thinner ones, as radiation pressure increases with the mass accretion rate, expanding the disk vertically.[1]

Categorization

[edit]

Thin, slim, and thick disks can be approximately differentiated by the ratio of the half-thickness of the disk to the radial distance of the disk from the accreting object, (sometimes called the aspect ratio). Thin disks have ,[2] slim disks have , and thick disks .[3][4]

Another type of accretion disk, advection-dominated accretion flows, have aspect ratios similar to a slim disk, but have properties different than conventional thin, slim, or thick disks.[3]

Thin disks

[edit]

Geometrically thin disks have low, sub-Eddington accretion rates and low luminosities. They have small scale heights and are confined largely to the equatorial plane, terminating cleanly at the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) if the accreting object is a black hole, although the inner radius may be affected by magnetic torque.[2][3][5] Additionally, they tend to be optically thick and bright due to electron scattering and absorption.[3]

Thin disks have negligible self-gravity and high accretion efficiencies. They also have high radiative efficiencies, leaving them with relatively cool temperatures.[6][4] Matter in thin disks has large angular momentum and typically moves in circular, Keplerian orbits.[7][6] Thin disks may be less stable when general relativity is incorporated.[8]

Because thin disks are easier than other types to approximate mathematically, since vertical energy transfer is negligible or easily simplified, they are often preferred in mathematical models. A commonly-used model is an optically thick, geometrically thin disk.[3][9]

Advection-dominated accretion flows

[edit]

Similar to thin disks, advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAF) have low mass accretion rates. However, unlike thin disks, they have a high, nearly-virial gas temperature and significant advection takes place, and their scale heights are more similar to slim disks. They are supported by thermal pressure and are optically thin. ADAF can exist with similar mass-accretion rates to thin disks, just under different physical conditions. Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, can be described by the ADAF model.[3][4]

Slim disks

[edit]

Slim disks have accretion rates around the Eddington limit, and are supported mainly by radiation pressure. They are moderately thick and have moderate opacity, with increased advective energy transport and reduced radiative efficiency. A slim disk can extend inside of the ISCO.[3] Slim disks have moderate accretion efficiencies.[4]

Vertical energy transfer processes are important in slim disks.[9] The thickness of a slim disk is determined by the balance between the outward radiation pressure and the inward vertical gravitational force. Thicker slim disks emit relativistic outflows due to radiation pressure.[1][10]

Thick disks

[edit]

Thick disks have super-Eddington accretion rates and high luminosities. These disks are toroidal in shape and are sometimes called Polish doughnuts.[3][7] They have large vertical scale heights and are not confined to the equatorial plane, and can extend inside of the ISCO.[11] Thick disks are almost entirely supported by radiation pressure rather than gas pressure and have lower accretion efficiencies than thin and slim disks. They are generally optically thick.[4]

For thick disks, the effects of advection and the disk's magnetic field are important.[6] It is believed that relativistic jets are generated by rotating black holes with geometrically thick disks because they have strong vertical magnetic fields.[12] The turbulent and radial motions of gas in a thick disk are also believed to affect the disk's reflection spectrum, although how and to what extent is still under scientific debate.[13]

Application to other systems

[edit]

Although geometrical thickness is often studied in regards to the accretion disks of black holes and neutron stars, it can also be applied to other astrophysical systems, including protoplanetary disks,[14] circumstellar disks,[15] circumplanetary disks,[16] and planetary rings.[17] These objects are generally considered to be geometrically thin.[14][15][16][17]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Feng, Junjie; Cao, Xinwu; Gu, Wei-Min; Ma, Ren-Yi (2019). "A Global Solution to a Slim Accretion Disk with Radiation-driven Outflows". The Astrophysical Journal. 885: 93. arXiv:1909.07559. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4592.
  2. 1 2 Afshordi, N.; Paczyński, B. (2003). "Geometrically Thin Disk Accreting into a Black Hole". The Astrophysical Journal. 592: 354–367. arXiv:astro-ph/0202409. doi:10.1086/375559.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wang, Zi-Liang (2025). "Exploring the role of accretion disk geometry in shaping black hole shadows". Physical Review D. 112 (6) 064052. arXiv:2506.21148. doi:10.1103/fhqj-wgcm.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Abramowicz, Marek A.; Fragile, P. Chris (2013). "Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory". Living Reviews in Relativity. 16 (1) 1. doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-1. PMC 5256006. PMID 28179840.
  5. Shafee, Rebecca; McKinney, Jonathan C.; Narayan, Ramesh; Tchekhovskoy, Alexander; Gammie, Charles F.; McClintock, Jeffrey E. (2008). "Three-Dimensional Simulations of Magnetized Thin Accretion Disks around Black Holes: Stress in the Plunging Region". The Astrophysical Journal. 687: L25–L28. arXiv:0808.2860. doi:10.1086/593148.
  6. 1 2 3 Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S.; Lovelace, R.V.E. (2001). "Advective accretion disks and related problems including magnetic fields". New Astronomy Reviews. 45 (11–12): 663–742. arXiv:astro-ph/0207625. doi:10.1016/S1387-6473(01)00146-4.
  7. 1 2 Stuchlík, Zdeněk; Kološ, Martin; Kovář, Jiří; Slaný, Petr; Tursunov, Arman (2020). "Influence of Cosmic Repulsion and Magnetic Fields on Accretion Disks Rotating around Kerr Black Holes". Universe. 6 (2): 26. doi:10.3390/universe6020026.
  8. Ujevic, Maximiliano; Letelier, Patricio S. (2004). "Stability of general relativistic geometric thin disks". Physical Review D. 70 (8) 084015. arXiv:gr-qc/0409110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.084015.
  9. 1 2 Sądowski, A.; Abramowicz, M.; Bursa, M.; Kluźniak, W.; Lasota, J.-P.; Różańska, A. (2011). "Relativistic slim disks with vertical structure". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 527: A17. arXiv:1006.4309. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015256.
  10. Gu, Wei-Min; Lu, Ju-Fu (2007). "A Note on the Slim Accretion Disk Model". The Astrophysical Journal. 660: 541–545. arXiv:astro-ph/0702185. doi:10.1086/512967.
  11. Yang, Chen-Yu; Zeng, Xiao-Xiong (2026). "Distinguishing black holes and neutron stars via optical images illuminated by thick accretion disks". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (7): 100. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/07/100.
  12. Meier, D. L. (2001). "The Association of Jet Production with Geometrically Thick Accretion Flows and Black Hole Rotation". The Astrophysical Journal. 548: L9–L12. arXiv:astro-ph/0010231. doi:10.1086/318921.
  13. Taylor, Corbin; Reynolds, Christopher S. (2018). "Exploring the Effects of Disk Thickness on the Black Hole Reflection Spectrum". The Astrophysical Journal. 855 (2): 120. arXiv:1712.05418. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaad63.
  14. 1 2 Armitage, Philip J. (2019). "Physical Processes in Protoplanetary Disks". From Protoplanetary Disks to Planet Formation. Saas-Fee Advanced Course. Vol. 45. pp. 1–150. arXiv:1509.06382. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58687-7_1. ISBN 978-3-662-58686-0.
  15. 1 2 Carciofi, Alex C. (2010). "The circumstellar discs of be stars". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 6: 325–336. arXiv:1009.3969. doi:10.1017/S1743921311010738.
  16. 1 2 Zhu, Zhaohuan (2015). "Accreting Circumplanetary Disks: Observational Signatures". The Astrophysical Journal. 799: 16. arXiv:1408.6554. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/16.
  17. 1 2 Dunn, D. (2002). "More Microwave Observations of Saturn: Modeling the Ring with a Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Code". Icarus. 160: 132–160. doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6956.