Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anus.com

Anus.com was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 10 votes to delete. Postdlf 00:51, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Anus.com

Advert for non-notable website. Note that it is an orphan and contains no internal links, just external ones. — Gwalla | Talk 00:15, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Alexa rank is ~132,000. Delete unless notability is proven. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 00:18, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • P.S. No, it's not porn. It's an advert for a nihilist society. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 00:19, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Wikipedia hopefully isn't anus mundi, not yet. Delete, non-notable. Fire Star 01:05, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• D "Why the use of the word ANUS?" Because you're all arseholes, obviously. Chris 02:47, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability. There's an explanation of the name on the site, but IMO the author used the word mainly to attract attention. Andrewa 03:52, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 04:04, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Duh.--Josiah 05:09, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopedic. --Improv 17:22, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Weak delete, I see no possibilty of becoming encyclopedic. If i am wrong I will change my vote. —siroχo 23:58, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory. —No-One Jones ^(m) 00:27, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. The group behind this site gives frequent interviews to technical publications (e.g. Wired) and post-modern cultural journals. While the subject matter is not agreeable to all, there is a sub-cult following making the site notable.