Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29d50adbd1bd937

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."


If you are here because you want an experienced editor to approve of your new article or proposed rename, you are in the wrong place.

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page, just click the button below.

To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.

  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Administration needed

If your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators).

Request for an administration

Technical requests

[edit]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]
I think this request has merit (WP:CONCISE), but note that not all of the Third Way's are political partices as the requester said. For example, the one in the US is a think tank, the one in France was a social movement, and the one in Poland is a higher-level alliance of smaller political parties. Meanwhile, the one in Palestine really is a political party, as the current article title says. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:33, 11 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Hello User:FaviFake. I'm leaving pings for the other participants in the prior move discussion (which you already linked) because I perceive there were different opinions about what to do next. Participants were User:Spartaz, User:Steel1943, User:fgnievinski, User:BD2412, User:Skarmory and User:Moxy. The closer of that discussion was User:Paine Ellsworth. EdJohnston (talk) 03:54, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply
It's never a waste of time to allow other editors enough time to weigh in and give their opinions at a formal RM, which is after all what I actually advised in the closing statement of the previous move request. P.I. Ellsworth, ed.  welcome!  04:10, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]

Contested technical requests

[edit]
@Josedimaria As contested before We generally do not use slashes in titles. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 14:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@BlorborosOuroboros "The Witch Boy" alone might not suffice, given that the DC character has been more prominent and for longer than the graphic novel series. I think a move to The Witch Boy trilogy would be better and send clearer signals to our readers about what page they'd be landing on. Red Shogun412 (talkcontribs) 01:09, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply
It would be stylized as The Witch Boy trilogy. Red Shogun412 (talkcontribs) 01:10, 12 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Administrator needed

[edit]