Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
Do reliable sources support treating the systems and features currently described in this article as a single coherent concept called "selection-based search"? Hashbrownie123 (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Should tables be used on this page for timelines of AI discoveries in math (like in the 2026#Q3 subsection), or not (like elsewhere on the page)? Matarisvan (talk) 16:59, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
A section of this article - Lander (spacecraft)#Impactors, does not seem related to this article about spacecraft landers; the main objective of an Impactor is to crash into an entity, and not land on it. Would it be more appropriate to remove that section from this article, since there already exists a main article on probe Impactors Deliberate crash landings on extraterrestrial bodies? Riverskysun (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Hi. The encapsulating respiration pages are a bit of a mess. The more specific ones like Cheyne–Stokes respiration are, afaik, totally fine. I suggest:
Aerobic respiration, Maintenance respiration, Bioenergetic systems, and probably some other ones people can suggest, merge into Cellular respiration. They are similarly technical, which is bad, duplicate topic articles need to specify a subtopic or be technically more in-depth. This would also solve the issue of numerous editors on these pages forgetting that things with lungs and mitochondria aren't the only respiring cells on the planet, ie the lead can more explicitly state that all cells respire (Cellular respiration already has good structure which is not taxonomically exclusive), with a handful of conserved methods and massively distinct adaptations therein across life.
Respiration (physiology) merged into Respiratory systems, and move that to Physiological respiration making the articles mirror themselves nicely in a disambig at Respiration#Biology, as they typically are presented in mainstream intro bio textbooks. Respiration#Biology then has two bullets: Cellular and Phsyiological, and each can list a few examples. The body plan-specific physiological respiration systems already have there own articles, which seem good enough.
C. Describe the study, and its conclusion, in one paragraph.
D. Describe the study in detail in a section of the article.
Please provide your opinion with a brief statement in the Survey. You may discuss in the Discussion section.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
