Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a9ade7d8bd04f

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did value-added theory say to its date? You add value to my life.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Value added theory)

Value-added theory (also known as social strain theory) is a sociological theory, first proposed by Neil Smelser in 1962, which posits that certain conditions are needed for the development of a social movement.[1]

Overview

[edit]

Smelser porter considered social movements to be the side-effects of rapid social change.[2] He argued that six things were necessary and sufficient for collective behavior to emerge,[1] and that social movements must evolve through the following relevant stages:[2][3]

  • Structural conduciveness: the structure of society must be organized in such a way that certain protest actions become more likely.
  • Structural strain: there must be a strain on society that is caused by factors related to the structure of the current social system, such as inequality or injustice, and existing power holders are unwilling or unable to address the problem.
  • Generalized belief: the strain should be clearly defined, agreed upon, and understood by participants in group action.
  • Precipitating factors: event(s) must occur that act as the proverbial spark that ignites the flame of action.
  • Mobilization for action: participants must have a network and organization that allows them to take collective action.
  • Operation (failure) of social control: authorities either will or will not react. High levels of social control by those in power, like politicians or police, often makes it more difficult for social movements to achieve their goals.

In academia

[edit]

The concept of value added is also utilized in the field of economics; in this case it refers to the total value of the revenue created by a product minus intermediate consumption.

Criticism

[edit]

Critics of value-added theory note that it is overly focused on the structural-functional approach because it views all strain on society as disruptive.[1][2]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 Kendall, 2005
  2. 1 2 3 Porta & Diani, 2006
  3. Sztompka, 2004

References

[edit]
  • Piotr Sztompka in Shaping sociological imagination: The importance of theory, Jeffrey C. Alexander, Gary T. Marx, Christine L. Williams (ed.), Self, Social Structure, and Beliefs, University of California Press, 2004, ISBN 0-520-24136-3, Google Print, p.254
  • Diana Kendall, Sociology In Our Times, Thomson Wadsworth, 2005, ISBN 0-534-64629-8 Google Print, p.530
  • Donatella della Porta, Mario Diani, Social Movements: An Introduction, Blackwell Publishing, 2006, ISBN 1-4051-0282-9, Google Print, p.7

Further reading

[edit]