Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a444c3295c245aae

Jump to content

Empire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Universal empire)
Diachronic map of the different empires of the modern era, during their existence.

An empire is a group of territories controlled by a monarch or a supreme central authority.[1] Within an empire, different populations may have different sets of rights and may be governed differently.[2] The word "empire" derives from the Roman concept of Imperium, which refers to the right to command.[3] Empires have taken many forms throughout history.[4]

Definition

[edit]

An empire is an aggregate of many territories under a supreme ruler or oligarchy.[5]

Definitions of what physically and politically constitutes an empire vary. It might be a state affecting imperial policies or a particular political structure. Empires are typically formed from diverse ethnic, national, cultural, and religious components.[6] 'Empire' and 'Colonialism' are used to refer to relationships between a powerful state or society versus a less powerful one; Michael W. Doyle has defined empire as "effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society".[7] Imperialism for Doyle is simply the process of establishing and maintaining an empire.[8] Similarly, for Rein Taagepera imperialism is a policy of conquest and domination of foreign lands and populations.[9]

Scholars typically distinguish empires from nation-states.[10][11][12] In an empire, there is a hierarchy whereby one group of people has command over other groups of people, and there is a hierarchy of rights and prestige for different groups of people.[13] Josep Colomer distinguished between empires and states in the following way:

  1. Empires were vastly larger than states
  2. Empires lacked fixed or permanent boundaries whereas a state had fixed boundaries
  3. Empires had a "compound of diverse groups and territorial units with asymmetric links with the center" whereas a state had "supreme authority over a territory and population"
  4. Empires had multi-level, overlapping jurisdictions whereas a state sought monopoly and homogenization[11]

Characteristics

[edit]

Empires are usually the result of military conquest, incorporating the vanquished states into their domain.[14]

Empires can expand by both land and sea. Territorial empires (e.g. the Macedonian Empire and Byzantine Empire) tend to be contiguous areas extending directly outwards from the original frontier. The terrestrial empire's maritime analogue is the thalassocracy, an empire composed of islands and coasts which are accessible to its terrestrial homeland, such as the Athenian-dominated Delian League and the British Empire) with looser structures and more scattered territories, often consisting of many islands and other forms of possessions which required the creation and maintenance of a powerful navy.[15]

Historical empires

[edit]

Athenian

[edit]

The Delian League was a confederacy of Greek city-states, numbering between 150 and 330,[16] founded in 478 BC[17] under the hegemony of Athens, whose purpose was to continue fighting the Persian Empire after the Greek victory in the Battle of Plataea at the end of the Second Persian invasion of Greece.[18] The League functioned as a dual—offensive and defensive—alliance (symmachia) of autonomous states, similar to its rival association, the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta.[19] The League's modern name derives from its official meeting place, the island of Delos, where congresses were held within the sanctuary of the Temple of Apollo;[20] contemporary authors referred to the organization simply as "the Athenians and their Allies".[21][22]

While Sparta excelled as Greece's greatest power on land, Athens turned to the seas, becoming the dominant naval power of the Greek world. Following Sparta's withdrawal from the conflict with Persia, Athens took the lead of the Hellenic alliance accompanied by several states around the Aegean and the Anatolian coast.[23][24] The Delian League was formed as an anti-Persian defensive association of equal city-states seeking protection under Athens, as the latter wished to extend its support towards the Ionian Greek colonies of Anatolia.[20][25] The alliance held an assembly of representatives in order to shape its policy, while members swore an oath of loyalty to the coalition.[24] By the mid-fifth century BC, it had developed into a naval imperial power, conventionally called the Athenian Empire, where Athens established complete dominion and the allies became increasingly less autonomous.[20] The League led by Cimon, successfully accomplished its principal strategic goal by decisively expelling the remaining Persian forces from the Aegean. As a result, Persia would cease to pose a major threat to Greece for the following fifty years.[26]

From its inception, Athens became the League's biggest source of military power, while more and more allies preferred to pay their dues in cash. Athens began to use the League's funds for its own purposes, like the reinforcement of its naval supremacy, which led to conflicts with the less powerful allies, at times culminating in rebellions, like that of Thasos in 465 BC.[27] The League's treasury initially stood in Delos until, in a symbolic gesture,[28] Pericles moved it to Athens in 454 BC.[29] By 431 BC, the threat that the League presented to Spartan hegemony, combined with Athens's heavy-handed administration, prompted the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War; the League was dissolved upon the war's conclusion in 404 BC[25] under the direction of Lysander. Witnessing Sparta's growing hegemony in the first half of the 4th century BC, Athens went on to partly revive the alliance, this time called the Second Athenian League, reestablishing its naval dominance in the eastern Mediterranean.[30]

Macedonia

[edit]

Throughout his military career, Alexander won every battle that he personally commanded.[31] His first victory against the Persians in Asia Minor at the Battle of the Granicus in 334 BC used a small cavalry contingent as a distraction to allow his infantry to cross the river followed by a cavalry charge from his companion cavalry.[32] Alexander led the cavalry charge at the Battle of Issus in 333 BC, forcing the Persian king Darius III and his army to flee.[32] Darius III, despite having superior numbers, was again forced to flee the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC.[32] The Persian king was later captured and executed by his own satrap of Bactria and kinsman, Bessus, in 330 BC. The Macedonian king subsequently hunted down and executed Bessus in what is now Afghanistan, securing the region of Sogdia in the process.[33] At the 326 BC Battle of the Hydaspes (modern-day Punjab), when the war elephants of King Porus of the Pauravas threatened Alexander's troops, he had them form open ranks to surround the elephants and dislodge their handlers by using their sarissa pikes.[34] When his Macedonian troops threatened mutiny in 324 BC at Opis, Babylonia (near modern Baghdad, Iraq), Alexander offered Macedonian military titles and greater responsibilities to Persian officers and units instead, forcing his troops to seek forgiveness at a staged banquet of reconciliation between Persians and Macedonians.[35] After Alexander's victory over the Achaemenid Empire, he died and his empire was split up amongst his generals.[36]

Roman

[edit]


The Roman Empire was a state that dominated the Mediterranean and much of Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa during the classical period. The Roman Republic had previously conquered most of these territories, which later came under permanent single-person rule following Octavian's rise to power and the establishment of the Augustan Principate in 27 BC. By the late 3rd century AD, the empire had been divided many times. The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476 AD, whereas the Eastern Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire) persisted until the fall of Constantinople in 1453.

By 100 BC, the city of Rome had expanded its rule from the Italian peninsula to most of the Mediterranean and beyond. However, it was severely destabilised by civil wars and political conflicts, which culminated in the victory of Octavian over Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, and the subsequent conquest of the Ptolemaic Kingdom in Egypt. In 27 BC, the Roman Senate granted Octavian overarching military power (imperium) and the new title of Augustus, marking his accession as the first Roman emperor. The vast Roman territories were organized into senatorial provinces, governed by proconsuls who were appointed by lot annually, and imperial provinces, which belonged to the emperor but were governed by legates.

The first two centuries of the Empire saw unprecedented stability and prosperity known as the Pax Romana (lit. 'Roman Peace'). Rome reached its greatest territorial extent under Trajan (r. 98–117 AD), but increasing trouble and decline began under Commodus (r. 180–192). In the 3rd century, the Empire underwent a 50-year crisis that threatened its existence due to civil war, plagues and barbarian invasions. The Gallic and Palmyrene empires broke away and a series of short-lived emperors led the Empire, which was later reunified under Aurelian (r. 270–275). The civil wars ended with the victory of Diocletian (r. 284–305), who set up two different imperial courts in the Greek East and Latin West. Constantine the Great (r. 306–337), the first Christian emperor, moved the imperial seat from Rome to Byzantium in 330, and renamed it Constantinople. The Migration Period, involving large invasions by Germanic peoples and the Huns, led to the decline of the Western Roman Empire. With the fall of Ravenna to the Germanic Herulians and the deposition of Romulus Augustus in 476 by Odoacer, the Western Empire finally collapsed. The Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire survived for another millennium with Constantinople as its sole capital, until the city's fall in 1453.[a]

Due to the Empire's extent and endurance, its institutions and culture had a lasting influence on the development of language, religion, art, architecture, literature, philosophy, law, and forms of government across its territories. The rediscovery of classical science and technology (which formed the basis for Islamic science) in medieval Europe contributed to the Scientific Renaissance and Scientific Revolution. Rome's republican institutions have influenced the Italian city-state republics of the medieval period, the early United States, and modern democratic republics.

Ancient Sparta

[edit]

Spartan hegemony was the period of dominance by Sparta in Greek affairs from 404 to 371 BC. Even before this period, the polis of Sparta was the greatest military land power of classical Greek antiquity and governed, dominated or influenced the entire Peloponnese. The defeat of the Athenians and the Delian League in the Peloponnesian War in 431–404 BC resulted in a short-lived Spartan dominance of the southern Greek world from 404 to 371 BC.[38] Due to their mistrust of others, Spartans discouraged the creation of records about their internal affairs. The only histories of Sparta are from the writings of Xenophon, Thucydides, Herodotus and Plutarch, none of whom were Spartans. Plutarch was writing several centuries after the period of Spartan hegemony had ceased.[38] This creates difficulties in understanding the Spartan political system, which was distinct from any other Greek polis.

Meeting between Spartan king Agesilaus (left) and Pharnabazus II (right).

Achaemenid

[edit]

The Achaemenid Empire[b] (/əˈkiː.mə.nɪd/, ə-KEE-mə-nid; Old Persian: 𐎧𐏁𐏂, Xšāça, lit. 'The Empire'[41] or 'The Kingdom'[42]) was an ancient Iranian empire founded by Cyrus the Great of the Achaemenid dynasty in 550 BC. At peak, its territorial extent was roughly 5.5 million square kilometres (2.1 million square miles), making it the largest empire of its time. Based in the Iranian plateau, it stretched from the Balkans and Cyrenaica in the west to the Indus Valley in the east, including Anatolia, Cyprus, Mesopotamia, the Levant, the South Caucasus, parts of Eastern Arabia, and large parts of Central Asia.[43][44][45]

By the 7th century BC, the region of Persis, located in the southwestern part of the Iranian plateau, had been settled by Persian people.[46] From Persis, Cyrus rose and defeated Media, Lydia, and the Neo-Babylonian Empire, thus marking the establishment of a new imperial polity in the ancient Near East. The empire expanded rapidly, but was repulsed from Scythia in 513 BC and from Greece in 492–490 BC and 480–479 BC.

In 330 BC, amidst a Greek military campaign that began in 336 BC, the Achaemenid Empire was conquered in its entirety by Alexander the Great, who annexed it to his Macedonian Empire.[47][44] Upon Alexander's death, which sparked the beginning of the Hellenistic period in 323 BC, the majority of the former Achaemenid Empire's territories came under the rule of the Seleucid Empire and the Ptolemaic Kingdom. Almost a century later, Iranian elites in the central plateau successfully reclaimed power from the Seleucids and established the Parthian Empire, which existed for nearly half a millennium before being succeeded by the Iranian Sasanian Empire.[46]

In the modern era, the Achaemenid Empire has been recognized for its centralized bureaucracy and administration; its multicultural policy and religious tolerance, especially under Cyrus; its complex infrastructure projects, such as the Royal Road and an organized postal system; the use of official languages (Persian and Aramaic) across its territories; and the development of a civil service and a large, professional army and navy. Many of these systems were adopted and expanded upon by later empires in the Greco-Roman world and beyond.[48]

Mongol

[edit]

The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in history. Originating in present-day Mongolia in East Asia, the medieval empire at its height stretched from the Sea of Japan to Eastern Europe, extending northward into Siberia and east and southward into the Indian subcontinent, mounting invasions of Southeast Asia, and conquering the Iranian plateau; and reaching westward as far as the Levant and the Carpathian Mountains.

The empire emerged from the unification of several nomadic tribes in the Mongol heartland under the leadership of Temüjin, known by the title of Genghis Khan (c. 1162–1227), whom a council proclaimed as the ruler of all Mongols in 1206. The empire grew rapidly under his rule and that of his descendants, who sent out invading armies in every direction. The vast transcontinental empire connected the East with the West, and the Pacific to the Mediterranean, in an enforced Pax Mongolica, allowing the exchange of trade, technologies, commodities, and ideologies across Eurasia.

The empire began to split due to wars over succession, as the grandchildren of Genghis Khan disputed whether the royal line should follow from his son and initial heir Ögedei, or from one of his other sons, such as Tolui, Chagatai, or Jochi. The Toluids prevailed after a bloody purge of the Ögedeid and Chagatayid factions, but disputes continued among the descendants of Tolui. The conflict over whether the empire would adopt a sedentary, cosmopolitan lifestyle, or continue its nomadic, steppe-based way of life was a major factor in the breakup.

After Möngke Khan died in 1259, rival kurultai councils simultaneously elected different successors, the brothers Ariq Böke and Kublai Khan, who fought each other in the Toluid Civil War (1260–1264) and dealt with challenges from the descendants of other sons of Genghis.[49] Kublai successfully took power, but war ensued as he sought unsuccessfully to regain control of the Chagatayid and Ögedeid families. By Kublai's death in 1294, the empire had fractured into four separate khanates or empires, each pursuing its own objectives: the Golden Horde khanate in the northwest, the Chagatai Khanate in Central Asia, the Ilkhanate in Iran, and the Yuan dynasty in China, based in modern-day Beijing.[50] In 1304, during the reign of Temür, the three western khanates accepted the suzerainty of the Yuan dynasty.[51][52]

The Ilkhanate was the first to fall, which disintegrated between 1335 and 1353. Next, the Yuan dynasty lost control of the Tibetan Plateau and China proper in 1354 and 1368, respectively, and collapsed after its capital Dadu was taken over by Ming forces. The Genghisid rulers of the Yuan then retreated north and continued to rule the Mongolian Plateau. The regime is thereafter known as the Northern Yuan dynasty, surviving as a rump state until the conquest by the Qing dynasty in the 1630s. The Golden Horde had broken into competing khanates by the end of the 15th century, and its rule on Eastern Europe is traditionally considered to have ended in 1480 with the Great Stand on the Ugra River by the Grand Duchy of Moscow, while the Chagatai Khanate lasted until 1687, or, in the Yarkent Khanate's case, until 1705.

British

[edit]

The British Empire comprised the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom and its predecessor states. It began with the overseas possessions and trading posts established by England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, and colonisation attempts by Scotland during the 17th century.[53] At its height in the 19th and early 20th centuries, it was the largest empire in history and, for a century, was the foremost global power.[54] By 1913 the British Empire held sway over 412 million people, 23 per cent of the world population at the time,[55] and by 1920 it covered 35.5 million km2 (13.7 million sq mi),[56] 24 per cent of the Earth's total land area. The British Parliament was the supreme law-making authority for all the British possessions which made up the Empire.[57] As a result, its constitutional, legal, linguistic, and cultural legacy is widespread. It was described as "the empire on which the sun never sets", as the sun was always shining on at least one of its territories.[58]

During the Age of Discovery in the 15th and 16th centuries, Portugal and Spain pioneered European exploration of the world, and in the process established large overseas empires. Motivated by the great wealth these empires generated,[59] England, France, and the Netherlands began to establish colonies and trade networks in the Americas and Asia. A series of wars in the 17th and 18th centuries with the Netherlands and France left Britain the dominant colonial power in North America. Britain became a major power in the Indian subcontinent after the East India Company's conquest of Mughal Bengal at the Battle of Plassey in 1757.

The American Revolution resulted in Britain losing some of its oldest and most populous colonies in North America by 1783. While retaining control of British North America (now Canada) and territories in and near the Caribbean in the British West Indies, British colonial expansion turned towards Asia, Africa, and the Pacific. After the defeat of France in the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), Britain emerged as the principal naval and imperial power of the 19th century and expanded its imperial holdings. It pursued trade concessions in China and Japan, and territory in Southeast Asia. The Great Game and Scramble for Africa also ensued. The period of relative peace (1815–1914) during which the British Empire became the global hegemon was later described as Pax Britannica (Latin for "British Peace"). It also colonised India by defeating the last major imperial dynasty Maratha Empire by 1818 in the Third Anglo-Maratha War. Alongside the formal control that Britain exerted over its colonies, its dominance of much of world trade, and of its oceans, meant that it effectively controlled the economies of, and readily enforced its interests in, many regions, such as Asia and Latin America.[60] It also came to dominate the Middle East, shaping its modern borders alongside France. Increasing degrees of autonomy were recognised for its white settler colonies, some of which were formally reclassified as dominions by the 1920s. By the start of the 20th century, Germany and the United States had begun to challenge Britain's economic lead. Military, economic and colonial tensions between Britain and Germany were major causes of the First World War, during which Britain relied heavily on its empire. The conflict placed enormous strain on its military, financial, and manpower resources. Although the empire achieved its largest territorial extent immediately after the First World War, Britain was no longer the world's preeminent industrial or military power.

In the Second World War, Britain's colonies in East Asia and Southeast Asia were occupied by the Empire of Japan. Despite the final victory of Britain and its allies, the damage to British prestige and the British economy helped accelerate the decline of the empire. India, Britain's most valuable and populous possession, achieved independence in 1947 as part of a larger decolonisation movement, in which Britain granted independence to most territories of the empire. The Suez Crisis of 1956 confirmed Britain's decline as a global power, and the handover of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997 symbolised for many the end of the British Empire,[61] though fourteen overseas territories that are remnants of the empire remain under British sovereignty. After independence many former British colonies, along with most of the dominions, joined the Commonwealth of Nations, a free association of independent states. Fifteen of these, including the United Kingdom, retain the same person as monarch, currently .

Russian

[edit]

The Russian Empire[c] was an empire that extended across northern Eurasia from 1721 until the proclamation of the Russian Republic in 1917, forming the final era of Tsarist Russia and the wider Russian monarchy. At its height in the late 19th century, it covered about 22,800,000 km2 (8,800,000 sq mi), roughly one-sixth of the world's landmass, making it the third-largest empire in history, behind only the British and Mongol empires.[62] The 1897 Russian census found a population of 126 million with considerable ethnic, linguistic, religious, and socioeconomic diversity.[63]

From the 10th to 17th century, the Russian lands were dominated by a noble class known as the boyars, above whom stood the grand prince and later the tsar, an absolute monarch. The groundwork of the empire was laid by Ivan III (r. 1462–1505), who greatly expanded his domain, established a centralized Russian national state, and secured independence from the Great Horde. His grandson, Ivan IV (r. 1533–1584), was the first Russian monarch to be crowned as tsar in 1547. Between 1550 and 1700, the Russian state grew by an average of 35,000 km2 (14,000 sq mi) per year.[64] Peter the Great transformed the tsardom into an empire, and fought wars that turned Russia into a major European power. He moved the capital from Moscow to the new model city of Saint Petersburg, and led a cultural revolution that introduced a modern, scientific, rationalist, and Western-oriented system. Catherine the Great (r. 1762–1796) presided over further Russian expansion by conquest, colonization, and diplomacy, while continuing Peter's policy of modernization. Alexander I (r. 1801–1825) helped defeat the militaristic ambitions of Napoleon and constituted the Holy Alliance, which aimed to restrain the rise of secularism and liberalism across Europe. Russia further expanded to the west, south, and east, strengthening it as a European power. Its victories in the Russo-Turkish wars were checked by defeat in the Crimean War (1853–1856), leading to a period of reform and conquests in Central Asia instead.[65] Alexander II (r. 1855–1881) initiated major reforms, most notably the 1861 emancipation of all 23 million serfs.[66] The period also saw major developments in literature, music, and the sciences.[67]

By the start of the 19th century, Russian territory extended from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the Black Sea in the south, and from the Baltic Sea in the west to Alaska in the east. It colonized Alaska between 1799 and 1867,[68] and in the early-to-mid 19th century briefly maintained outposts in California. The empire also expanded its control over the Caucasus, most of Central Asia, and parts of Northeast Asia. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the empire experienced industrial growth and railway construction, though the country remained largely agrarian.[69] Severe famines, such as that of 1891–1892, along with resistance to political reform, led to growing unrest and the rise of revolutionary movements.[70] Following the 1905 Revolution, Nicholas II (r. 1894–1917) authorized the creation of a national parliament, the State Duma, though ultimate power remained with him.[71]

Russia entered the First World War in 1914 on the side of the Allies. High casualties, military setbacks, and severe food and fuel shortages in the cities led to widespread discontent with the monarchy.[72] In 1917, mass unrest in Petrograd and army mutinies culminated in the February Revolution, which led to Nicholas II's abdication, the establishment of the Russian Provisional Government, and the proclamation of the Russian Republic. Political instability, continued involvement in the unpopular war, and economic disruption resulted in mass demonstrations against the government in July.[73] The republic was overthrown in the October Revolution by the Bolsheviks, who proclaimed the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and signed a treaty that ended Russia's involvement in the war, but who nevertheless were opposed by various factions known collectively as the Whites.[74][75] After emerging victorious in the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks established the Soviet Union across most of the Russian territory; Russia was one of four continental European empires to collapse as a result of World War I, along with Germany, Austria–Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire.[76]

Growth and collapse

[edit]

Growth

[edit]

Throughout human history there has been a trend of empires with increasing sizes.[77] Empire building was historically used as a method of scaling up cooperation between societies beyond the level of city states and small territorial states.[78] Cipolla credits the ability for an empire to grow to it's increasing incomes and consumption, both public and private.[79]

Collapse

[edit]

According to Peter Turchin, shrinking earnings and worsening living conditions breed resentment amongst citizens which leads to strife domestically. This leads more wealthier groups to turn to the government for wealth which tends to expand its spending while tax income drops because of growing hardship. When public funds fail the state can no longer control its soldiers or police. This causes elite rivalries to expand into civil war and mass uprisings.[80]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ↑ "After the capture of Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire became the capital of the Ottoman Empire. The Osmanli Turks called their empire the Empire of Rum (Rome) (Ottoman Turkish: دولت علنإه روم, lit. 'Exalted State of Rome')."[37] In this sense, it could be argued that a "Roman" Empire survived until the early 20th century.
  2. ↑ Also called the Achaemenian Empire,[39] the Persian Empire,[39] Ancient Persia, Old Persia, or the First Persian Empire.[40]
  3. ↑
    • Russian: Российская империя, romanized: Rossiyskaya imperiya; pre-reform spelling: Россійская имперія; IPA: [rɐˈsʲijskəjə ɪmˈpʲerʲɪjə] ⓘ
    • Also known as the All-Russian Empire, Imperial Russia, Tsarist Russia, or simply Russia.

References

[edit]
Citations
  1. ↑ Howe, Stephen (22 August 2002). Empire: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160444-7.
  2. ↑ Burbank & Cooper 2010, p. 8.
  3. ↑ Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, C. A.; Scheidel, Walter (2 December 2020). The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-977311-4.
  4. ↑ Burbank, Jane; Cooper, Frederick (2011). Empires in World History. doi:10.1515/9781400834709. ISBN 978-1-4008-3470-9.
  5. ↑ "Oxford Dictionary Online". Retrieved 2020-06-30. "An extensive territory under the control of a supreme ruler (typically an emperor) or an oligarchy, often consisting of an aggregate of many separate states or territories. In later use also: an extensive group of subject territories ultimately under the rule of a single sovereign state."
  6. ↑ Howe 2002, p. 15. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help)
  7. ↑ Doyle, Michael (5 September 2018). Empires. Cornell University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-5017-3413-7. I favor the behavioral definition of empire as effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society.
  8. ↑ Doyle, Michael (5 September 2018). Empires. Cornell University Press. pp. 30, 37. ISBN 978-1-5017-3413-7.
  9. ↑ Taagepera, Rein & Nemcok, Miroslav (2024). More People, Fewer States: The Past and Future of World Population and Empire Sizes. (Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-42782-1), p 48.
  10. ↑ Tilly, Charles (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Blackwell. pp. 4, 45–46.
  11. 1 2 Colomer, Josep M. (2017). "Empires Versus States". Empires Versus States. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.608. ISBN 978-0-19-022863-7.
  12. ↑ Hechter, Michael; Brustein, William (1980). "Regional Modes of Production and Patterns of State Formation in Western Europe". American Journal of Sociology. 85 (5): 1061–1094. doi:10.1086/227125. ISSN 0002-9602. JSTOR 2778891. S2CID 143853058.
  13. ↑ Stanard, Matthew G. (2018). European Overseas Empire, 1879 - 1999: A Short History. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-1-119-13013-0.
  14. ↑ Sinopoli, Carla M. (1994). "The Archaeology of Empires". Annual Review of Anthropology. 23: 159–180. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001111. JSTOR 2156010.
  15. ↑ Howe, Stephen (22 August 2002). Empire: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160444-7.
  16. ↑ Nelson & Allard-Nelson 2005, p. 197.
  17. ↑ Roisman & Yardley 2011, Timeline, p. xliii; Martin 2000, pp. 96, 105–106.
  18. ↑ Roisman & Yardley 2011, 18: The Athenian Empire, pp. 246–266.
  19. ↑ Luttenberger 2017, Chapter VII: "The allies were autonomous and the alliance was a symmachia (defensive/offensive alliance) against Persia [...] It was a dual alliance similar to the Peloponnesian League. Athens was acknowledged hegemon of the League".
  20. 1 2 3 Zagorin 2009, p. 13.
  21. ↑ Rhodes 2006, p. 18. In ancient sources, there is no special designation for the league and its members as a group are simply referred to with phrases along the lines of "the Athenians and their allies" (see Artz 2008, p. 2).
  22. ↑ Luttenberger 2017, Chapter VII: "To the Hellenes it was called "the Athenians and their Allies".
  23. ↑ Zagorin 2009, pp. 12–13.
  24. 1 2 Martin 2000, p. 106.
  25. 1 2 "Delian League". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 12 February 2024.
  26. ↑ Martin 2000, p. 140.
  27. ↑ Martin 2000, p. 107.
  28. ↑ Keuls 1993, p. 18
  29. ↑ Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. 1.96.
  30. ↑ Engen 2010, p. 58.
  31. ↑ Gilley & Worthington 2010, pp. 192–193.
  32. 1 2 3 Gilley & Worthington 2010, p. 193.
  33. ↑ Gilley & Worthington 2010, pp. 193–194; Holt 2012, pp. 27–41.
  34. ↑ Gilley & Worthington 2010, pp. 193–194.
  35. ↑ Gilley & Worthington 2010, p. 194; Errington 1990, p. 113.
  36. ↑ Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, Christopher Alan; Scheidel, Walter (2021). The Oxford World History of Empire. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-753276-8.
  37. ↑ Roy, Kaushik (2015). Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400–1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships. Bloomsbury Studies in Military History Series. Bloomsbury. p. 37. ISBN 9781474264037.
  38. 1 2 Jones, Nicholas F. Politics and Society in Ancient Greece. Westport, CT: Prager, 2008
  39. 1 2 Lavan, Payne & Weisweiler 2016, p. 17.
  40. ↑ Brosius 2020, p. 1.
  41. ↑ Shahbazi, A. Shapur (2012). "The Achaemenid Persian Empire (550–330 bce)". In Daryaee, Touraj (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Iranian History. pp. 120–141. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199732159.013.0005. ISBN 978-0-19-973215-9. p. 131: Although the Persians and Medes shared domination and others were placed in important positions, the Achaemenids did not—could not—provide a name for their multinational state. Nevertheless, they referred to it as Khshassa, 'the Empire'.
  42. ↑ Kent, Roland G. (1954). Old Persian: grammar, texts, lexicon. American Oriental Society. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-940490-33-8. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  43. ↑ Turchin, Peter; Adams, Jonathan M.; Hall, Thomas D. (26 August 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires and Modern States". Journal of World-Systems Research: 219–229. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2006.369.
  44. 1 2 Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 115–138. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959.
  45. ↑ Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, C. A.; Scheidel, Walter (2020). The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-0-19-977311-4.
  46. 1 2 Sacks, David; Murray, Oswyn; Brody, Lisa (2005). Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World. Infobase Publishing. p. 256. ISBN 978-0-8160-5722-1.
  47. ↑ Wilcken, Ulrich (1967). Alexander the Great. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-393-00381-9.
  48. ↑ Schmitt, Rüdiger (1983). "Achaemenid Dynasty". In Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. I/4: Abū Manṣūr Heravı̄–Adat (Online ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. pp. 414–426.
  49. ↑ "The Islamic World to 1600: The Golden Horde". University of Calgary. 1998. Archived from the original on 13 November 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  50. ↑ Allsen (1994), p. 413.
  51. ↑ Jackson (2014), p. 127.
  52. ↑ Allsen. Culture and Conquest (2001), pp. xiii, 235.
  53. ↑ "Colonial histories and legacies in our museums". National Museums Scotland. Archived from the original on 16 February 2025. Retrieved 1 March 2025.
  54. ↑ Ferguson 2002.
  55. ↑ Maddison 2001, p. 97, "The total population of the Empire was 412 million [in 1913]"; Maddison 2001, p. 241, ""[World population in 1913 (in thousands):] 1 791 020".
  56. ↑ Taagepera 1997, p. 502.
  57. ↑ Halsbury (ed.), The Laws of England, 1st ed., vol. XXI, paras. 1065, 1067 (London: Butterworth & Co., 1912).
  58. ↑ Jackson 2013, pp. 5–6.
  59. ↑ Russo 2012, p. 15, chapter 1 'Great Expectations': "The dramatic rise in Spanish fortunes sparked both envy and fear among northern, mostly Protestant, Europeans.".
  60. ↑ Porter 1998, p. 8; Marshall 1996, pp. 156–157.
  61. ↑ Brendon 2007, p. 660; Brown 1998, p. 594.
  62. ↑ Taagepera, Rein (September 1997). "Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia". International Studies Quarterly. 41 (3): 475–504. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00053. JSTOR 2600793. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  63. ↑ "First General Census of the Russian Empire of 1897". Demoscope Weekly. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
  64. ↑ Pipes 1974, p. 80.
  65. ↑ "The Great Game, 1856–1907: Russo-British Relations in Central and East Asia". reviews.history.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 10 April 2022. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
  66. ↑ Moon, David (2001). The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia 1762–1907. Longman. pp. 22–24. ISBN 978-0-582-29486-8.
  67. ↑ Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. (2011). A History of Russia (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 371–385. ISBN 978-0-19-534197-3.
  68. ↑ Vinkovetsky, Ilya (2011). Russian America: An Overseas Colony of a Continental Empire, 1804–1867. Oxford University Press. pp. 12–19. ISBN 978-0-19-539128-2.
  69. ↑ Gregory, Paul R. (1982). Russian National Income, 1885–1913. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55–59. ISBN 978-0-521-24382-7.
  70. ↑ "Russian Empire". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 25 December 2022. Retrieved 14 August 2022.
  71. ↑ Hosking, Geoffrey (1973). The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–15. ISBN 978-0-521-20190-2.
  72. ↑ Gatrell, Peter (2014). Russia's First World War: A Social and Economic History. Routledge. pp. 154–170. ISBN 978-0-582-32818-1.
  73. ↑ Wade, Rex A. (21 April 2005). The Russian Revolution, 1917. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84155-9.
  74. ↑ Swain, Geoffrey (2014). Trotsky and the Russian Revolution. Routledge. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-317-81278-4. OL 37192398M. Retrieved 20 June 2015. The first government to be formed after the February Revolution of 1917 had, with one exception, been composed of liberals.
  75. ↑ Rabinowitch, Alexander (2008). The Bolsheviks in Power: The First Year of Soviet Rule in Petrograd. Indiana University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-253-22042-4. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
  76. ↑ Planert, Ute; Retallack, James, eds. (2017). Decades of Reconstruction. Cambridge University Press. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-107-16574-8. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  77. ↑ Taagepera, Rein (1978). "Size and duration of empires: Systematics of size". Social Science Research. 7 (2): 108–127. doi:10.1016/0049-089X(78)90007-8.
  78. ↑ Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, C. A.; Scheidel, Walter (7 November 2020). The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-753274-4.
  79. ↑ Cipolla, Carlo M. (7 March 2013). The Economic Decline of Empires. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-03241-8.
  80. ↑ Turchin, Peter (27 February 2007). War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires. Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-12691-2.

Cited sources and further reading

[edit]
  • Brown, Peter (24 September 2020). "No Barbarians Needed". The New York Review of Books. LXVII (14): 61–62. Warlordism, not any great movement of peoples, was the political virus that brought down the Roman empire in the West. [...] 'In less than a generation, provinces [became] kingdoms.' [Due to Europe's] state of perpetual war [amid] the persistent polycentrism made possible by the disappearance of Rome, [b]y the time of the Reformation the 'competitive fragmentation of power' ensured that Europe was studded with safety zones that protected beleaguered dissidents. [...] The best thing that Rome ever did for Europe was to die and not return., review of Kulikowski, Michael. The Tragedy of Empire: From Constantine to the Destruction of Roman Italy.; Scheidel, Walter. Escape from Rome: The Failure of Empire and the Road to Prosperity.; Nelson, Janet L. King and Emperor: A New Life of Charlemagne.
  • Burbank, Jane; Cooper, Frederick (2010). Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12708-8.
  • Cohen, Eliot A. (July–August 2004). "History and the Hyperpower". Foreign Affairs. 83 (4): 49–63. doi:10.2307/20034046. JSTOR 20034046. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  • Colomer, Josep (2016). The European Empire. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-5233-1890-2.
  • Colomer, Josep (2007). Great Empires, Small Nations. The uncertain future of the sovereign state. London: Routledge.
  • Crooks, Peter; Parsons, Timothy H., eds. (2016). Empires and bureaucracy in world history: from late antiquity to the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
  • Darwin, John (2008). After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405. London: Bloomsbury Press.
  • Doniger, Wendy, "The Rise and Fall of Warhorses" (review of David Chaffetz, Raiders, Rulers, and Traders: The Horse and the Rise of Empires, Norton, 2024, 424 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXXII, no. 6 (10 April 2025), pp. 17–19. "Unlike cows, horses, whose teeth are quite dull, pull up grass by the roots rather than biting off the blades, or they nibble it right down to the ground, thus quickly destroying the land, which may require some years to recover.... [H]orses in the wild... range constantly to find new territory... [T]he horse came to symbolize conquest through its own natural imperialism. The steppes bred nomadic horses and nomadic hordes.... Men waged war to get other people's horses so that they could wage war. Horsepower... remained the basic unit of power for centuries.... But the horse-breeding people of the steppes never succeeded in conquering the part of the world west of the Carpathians and the Alps, nor civilizations.... where sea power... was decisive." (p. 17.)
  • Elliott, J.H. (2006). Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America, 1492–1830. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Findlay, Ronald; O'Rourke, Kevin H. (2007). Power and Plenty: Trade, Power, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Galtung, Johan (January 1996). "The Decline and Fall of Empires: A Theory of De-Development". Honolulu. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2008-01-06. Written for the United Nations Research Institute on Development, UNRISD, Geneva.
  • Geiss, Imanuel (1983). War and Empire in the Twentieth Century. Aberdeen University Press. ISBN 978-0-08-030387-1.
  • Gilpin, Robert (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 110–116. ISBN 978-0-521-27376-3.
  • Howe, Stephen (2002). Empire: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280223-1.
  • Innis, Harold (1950). Empire and Communications (1972 revision ed.). Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press., Rev. by Mary Q. Innis; foreword by Marshall McLuhan.
  • James, Paul; Nairn, Tom (2006). Globalization and Violence. Vol. 1: Globalizing Empires, Old and New. London: Sage Publications.
  • Khan, Iqtidar Alam (March–April 2005). "Gunpowder and Empire: Indian Case". Social Scientist. 33 (3/4): 54–65. JSTOR 3518112.
  • Kamen, Henry (2003). Empire: How Spain Became a World Power, 1492–1763. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House 1987.
  • Kumar, Krishan (2019). Visions of empire: How five imperial regimes shaped the world. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-19280-2., examines the Roman, Ottoman, Habsburg, Russian, British and French empires.
  • Lens, Sidney; Zinn, Howard (2003). The Forging of the American Empire: From the Revolution to Vietnam: A History of American Imperialism. Pluto Press. p. 464. ISBN 978-0-7453-2100-4.
  • Pagden, Anthony (2001). Peoples and Empires: A Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest from Greece to the Present. New York: Modern Library.
  • Stearns, Peter, ed. (2001). The Encyclopedia of World History: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, Chronologically Arranged (6th ed.). Houghton Mifflin. p. passim. ISBN 978-0-395-65237-4.
  • Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1993). The Portuguese Empire in Asia, 1500–1700. London: Longman.
  • Tracy, James D., ed. (1990). The Rise of Merchant Empires: State Power and World Trade, 1350–1750. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[edit]