Template talk:Science review

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal

Edit requests

This page is the within the scope of WikiProject Edit requests, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's edit request process and reduce the number of edit requests in the edit request queue.Edit requestsWikipedia:WikiProject Edit requestsTemplate:WikiProject Edit requestsEdit requests

Science

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience

Contradictory template description

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"This article or section reads like a scientific review article" implies that scientific reviews are bad, yet it later asks editors to "replace inadequate primary references with secondary sources such as scientific review articles". Without further documentation, the template's purpose is unclear. -Temporal User (Talk) 08:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Template talk:Science review

Contradictory template description