Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26e286f3fe890ce

Jump to content

Template talk:EBD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:EBD/testcases)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Laterthanyouthink in topic Missing title

Indent removed

[edit]

I've taken out the ":" from the beginning, to make this template match other similar templates (like {{1911}}). It also lets bullet points show up when used as part of a reference list. Kafziel 14:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Missing title

[edit]

I don't want to mess it up, but hoping someone else can fix an error apparently left over from the last vandal's attack, perhaps? Trappist the monk, Headbomb? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

What vandal attack? It looks like the template is doing what it should to be doing. The missing error message is emitted when both of |title= and |wstitle= are empty or omitted:
{{Cite EBD|wstitle=Samaritan Pentateuch}}
Easton, Matthew George (1897). "Samaritan Pentateuch" . Easton's Bible Dictionary (New and revised ed.). T. Nelson and Sons.
{{Cite EBD|title=Samaritan Pentateuch}}
Public Domain Easton, Matthew George (1897). "Samaritan Pentateuch". Easton's Bible Dictionary (New and revised ed.). T. Nelson and Sons.
{{Cite EBD|wstitle=}}
Public Domain Easton, Matthew George (1897). Easton's Bible Dictionary (New and revised ed.). T. Nelson and Sons. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
Trappist the monk (talk) 11:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ah, right, sorry. I was in a hurry when I came across it and obviously it hadn't been used correctly in the article in which I encountered it (where it didn't even include a parameter name). I had a quick look at the history of the template and saw mention of vandalism, so thought that an error remained in the template. My mistake. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply