Talk:TOPLYGA
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Alex95-Ukraine in topic "2026 A Lyga" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
TV Coverage
[edit]Is there any tv companies that cover the A Lyga?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.240.89.39 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2007
Spectator data
[edit]@Sir Sputnik: Spectator data is pretty accurate, if you have other sources please correct and update, don't just negate other users work with some blunt generalization that one particular source is not reliable.Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Wolfmartyn: Since much of transfermarkt's content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is a self-published and therefore unreliable source. It should not be cited. As such, the attendence figures are unverified, and should not be readded without including a reliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Sir Sputnik: Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope of bringing in bias and profiling, just like you did now - first shoot/delete then question. Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable?
Yes: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source.Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope
Some sources are more reliable than others, it's a fundamental principle of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. And per WP:FOOTY consensus (see Wikipedia:Consensus), Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)- Link to most recent Transfermarkt discussion: WP:TRANSFERMARKT. And we only include reliable sources, which means they have to demonstrate a level of fact-checking which Transfermarkt does not, because it's a user-generated site. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Sir Sputnik: Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope of bringing in bias and profiling, just like you did now - first shoot/delete then question. Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
"2026 A Lyga" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect 2026 A Lyga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 19 § Football redirects until a consensus is reached. Alex (talk) 07:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)