Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23140113f0fae97

Jump to content

Talk:Straight-twin engine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Straight-two engine)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mr Larrington in topic Ferrari I-2

Terminology

[edit]

(This post kind-of follows the "Parallel Twin" post above).

I think the paragraph (in italics, below), from the Terminology section is wrong. There is no difference between a parallel twin and a vertical twin. It is NOT a question of their crankshaft angles. One simply describes an engine as a 360°,180°, 270° parallel-twin (or vertical twin).

"In the United Kingdom, the term "parallel-twin" is traditionally used for engines with a crankshaft angle of 360 degrees, since the two pistons are in the same direction (i.e. parallel to each other).[citation needed] "Vertical-twin" was used to describe engines with a crankshaft angle of 180 degrees,[citation needed] which causes the pistons to travel in opposite directions. The terms "straight-twin" and "inline-twin" were used more generically for any crankshaft angle." Arrivisto (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Arrivisto (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ferrari I-2

[edit]

Ferrari’s Aurelio Lampredi designed a 2.5 litre inline two-cylinder engine for the mid-1950s Formula One regulations, ostensibly because it would have more torque for slow and twisty circuits like Monaco. Apparently it broke on the test rig and was never actually run in a car. The Hans Tanner/Doug Nye history of Ferrari has more details but it’s at home and I'm not. Mr Larrington (talk) 15:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)Reply