Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45650368f33d287

Jump to content

Talk:The Pyramid (British Columbia)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Pyramid Dome)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by GN22 in topic GA review

Official name should prevail

[edit]

I'm in no mood to make the change right now, but as the official name of this mountain is "The Pyramid", that's what this article shoudl be titled, and it shouldcertainly be reflected in the infobox; dab might have to be The Pyramid (volcano) or The Pyramid (mountain).Skookum1 (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Pyramid (British Columbia)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 23:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: GN22 (talk · contribs) 16:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Yes. The spelling and grammar are consistent and correct; the prose is clear and concise. All unfamiliar terms are either linked or supported by context.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, list incorporation, and table accessibility. Yes. The lead is concise and aptly summarizes the article in two short paragraphs.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Yes.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Yes.
2c. it contains no original research. Yes.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Yes.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Yes. It addresses the name, geography, geology, and history of The Pyramid.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Yes. There is a paragraph devoted to the provincial park The Pyramid is in, but it provides helpful context as to the mountain’s location and surroundings.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Yes.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Yes.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Yes.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, have suitable captions, and have alt text. Yes. There are only two images in the article, but as this article is relatively short, this is suitable. This page could benefit from a few more images related to the text.
7. Overall assessment. This article is well-organized and concise. It meets all guidelines. A couple more images related to the text could be added. Overall, this article meets the GA requirements.

Congratulations!