Talk:Pustec (municipality)

Official name changes

I intend on moving all of the articles of the villages in this municipality to their Macedonian names since those appear to have become official recently (, , , ). Additionally, it seems these names are also the WP:commonname ones as well. --Local hero ^talk 02:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pustec Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924085559/http://www.reformaterritoriale.al/images/presentations/Ligji%20ndarja%20territoriale_Fletore_zyrtare.pdf to http://www.reformaterritoriale.al/images/presentations/Ligji%20ndarja%20territoriale_Fletore_zyrtare.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924035505/http://www.instat.gov.al/media/195826/7__korce.pdf to http://www.instat.gov.al/media/195826/7__korce.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117010012/http://www.ihf-hr.org/viewbinary/viewdocument.php?doc_id=1932 to http://www.ihf-hr.org/viewbinary/viewdocument.php?doc_id=1932

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Pustec Municipality without merging other pre-2015 municipalities?

How come Pustec Municipality was the only post-2015 municipality that survived the 2015 Albanian local government reform without merging other pre-2015 municipalities? I believe that being "coterminous" as its own and only "administrative unit" (or municipal unit) within itself hurts it a bit, while other post-2015 municipalities have at least at least upto two administrative units as a bare minimum. jlog3000 (talk) 17:40, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

To maintain its unique demographic profile within Albania. --Local hero ^talk 04:03, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

How is being coextensive being unique? It's like having one local government area/unit to only consist of just one populated place, and that one being only its downtown centre, without any additional settlements or localities outside of its borders. Help me make it make sense, I dare anyone. jlog3000 (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand the purpose of the discussion. If there was a reorganization of municipal divisions in Albania and Pustec was unaffected, it is likely because it's the only municipality populated entirely by the Macedonian minority. Merging it with other municipalities would make it no longer so. --Local hero ^talk 17:19, 14 June 2026 (UTC)