Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45413d90938984a

Jump to content

Talk:Truth & Transparency Foundation/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:MormonLeaks/GA1)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by FallingGravity in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FallingGravity (talk · contribs) 02:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Failed "good article" nomination

[edit]

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 15, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:  Pass. The article now follows MOS:LDS.
2. Verifiable?:  Pass. As it stands, the article is well-referenced.
3. Broad in coverage?: ✗ Fail. The article is outdated. For example, recently MormonLeaks released what it purports to be the salary of some LDS Church leaders, and this is not on here. Even the article's title is outdated, as the main website says "Welcome to MormonLeaks™ (Formerly MormonWikiLeaks™)".
4. Neutral point of view?:  Pass. The article includes multiple views on MormonLeaks.
5. Stable?: Not sure. Once again, the article's outdatedness hinders its path to Good Article status. If the article can be updated without a content dispute it will likely be stable.
6. Images?:  Pass. The logo image, like the article's title, is outdated, but properly labelled as fair use. The other images are properly licensed for Wikipedia use.

This article needs some updating to pass GA requirements.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— FallingGravity 02:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I've decided to put this article on hold for improvements. If the article isn't improved in seven days or so then it will likely fail this GA nomination. FallingGravity 03:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
The article has seen some minor improvements since I last reviewed it, but not enough to pass GA. FallingGravity 19:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply