Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23a1284efc1cf43

Jump to content

Talk:Luma Energy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:LUMA Energy)
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 22 April 2026

Pictures to Add

[edit]

Information to add

[edit]

needs work

[edit]

I'm going to work on this page. The article seems long and rambling. Open to help if anyone wants. Hannahthom7 (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

history updates

[edit]

the notice on the top of the article - "Parts of this article (those related to History) need to be updated. The reason given is: Information is only up to date as far as summer 2021, but a lot has happened since.. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2022)". I found updates from 2022-present. Going to add. Hannahthom7 (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

headers

[edit]

I changed some of the headers in the Backlash, controversy and protests section. For example, changed Contract controversy to Government contract, changed Widespread protests to Public reaction. The smaller headers such as Electrical hazards and damage and Service insufficiency seem to me to be devoted to criticism. So I removed them. Per WP:CRIT, editors are asked to avoid devoting sections to criticism. WP:STRUCTURE asks editors to pay attention to headers that might unduly favor one point of view or one aspect of the subject. Thanks. Hannahthom7 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 April 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:59, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


LUMA EnergyLuma Energy – As best I can tell, "LUMA" is just all-caps styling, not an abbreviation of a phrase. CBS News and WPLG are two referenced sources with "Luma". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:43, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.