Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a72dd30bbbc424

Jump to content

Talk:High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
Latest comment: 2 months ago by LuckyLouie in topic Jerry Smith?


Only one or many

[edit]

We only get told another Alaskan haarp facility and they act like it is only a single research facility now in the hands of the university but actually there are many many haarp sites around the world. Can you find one in your country. 49.197.220.108 (talk) 08:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have found 4 so far in Australia but have been told there maybe a couple more. 49.197.220.108 (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
There's only one HAARP facility. However, there's 2 ionospheric research facilities in other countries that are active. 172.58.182.49 (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


"Nick Begich, Jr." listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Nick Begich, Jr. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 12 § Nick Begich, Jr. until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 07:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Jerry Smith?

[edit]

I see text from a WP:PRIMARY source (a book by Jerry Smith) has been added to the article's conspiracy theories section at some point. All the other items noted in this section are cited to secondary sources. I don't think adding opinion by a non notable fringe author is WP:DUE, even if it's verifiably being sold on Amazon. Now, if there are secondary sources that mention Smith's ideas about HAARP that establish that the wider world has paid attention to this guy's book, let's use them. Otherwise Wikipedia is promoting one guy's non notable fringe book about HAARP to the exclusion of dozens of other non notable fringe books about HAARP that exist. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply