Talk:Grand master (order)
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article/category
[edit]If the article was decided to "keep", then why was its subsequent category, Category:Grand Masters, deleted? Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 27 October 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
– To make room for new article place. Arguments: Since most of its current content could be considered secondary to the content in the article Grand Master (order). Why? It only corresponds to English language phenonomens (WP:Global) and only to things after 20th century. The question about "Grand Master" and "Grandmaster" could find a simple solution with "also called" notice on the lead section comme-il-faut. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with {{SUBST:re}} (Talk) 10:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose several of the subjects are capital G capital M. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose clearly no absolute topic here and certainly not Grand Master (order) In ictu oculi (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. @Chicbyaccident: Unless you can provide evidence that Grand Master (order) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, this looks like a request that can be closed quickly — Andy W. (talk) 02:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- OK, arguments added. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with {{SUBST:re}} (Talk) 12:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: I don't even understand the offered rationale. If there's a primary topic here, I would suspect it to be Grandmaster (chess). —BarrelProof (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – It is easily confused with the widely used chess title, even though it does not use a space. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I fixed the malformed multiple page move request in this edit. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Capitalisation
[edit]If the general rules apply (capitalised only if part of a specific individual's title), then pls change everywhere accordingly, so: grand master (neither Grand master nor Grand Master). Or is there some other rule that applies here? Arminden (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)