Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d84ee188ad858

Jump to content

Talk:First-class citizen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:First-class object)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2603:3005:5008:3700:A1D9:9851:5DC2:EB03 in topic Proposing move over redirect to "first class object"

Proposing move over redirect to "first class object"

[edit]

"First class citizen" is a significantly rarer term for this topic than both "first class object" and "first class type". Further, "first class citizen" has another conflicting meanings in the content of a human society so this unnecessarily exposes the article to potential disambiguation issues. While not a definitive metric, Google's search results are a guide to help understand the frequency with which synonyms are used:

Search term Results
"first class object" 867,000
"first class type" 844,000
"first class citizen" 440,000
"first class entity"  16,500

So it appears "object" or "type" should clearly be the title. Jason Quinn (talk) 09:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree that using this term introduces unnecessary ambiguity, however Object is also introduces ambiguity in a different way.
I'd suggest using Type or Entity. 2603:3005:5008:3700:A1D9:9851:5DC2:EB03 (talk) 22:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply