Talk:Fox News

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fox News article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40: 30 days

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Concern: The introduction mentions alleged bias or other controversial information.

WP:LEAD - The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and briefly describing its notable controversies. It is appropriate to overview the controversies and allegations of bias, as these are substantial.

Concern: The introduction mentions allegations of conservative bias but I've seen studies that say Fox News is centrist and/or liberal. Shouldn't these viewpoints be mentioned in the lead as well?

Although there are studies with various viewpoints on Fox, the view that Fox is conservative dominates. For the lead we restrict ourselves to the dominant view, conservative bias, while noting that this viewpoint has dissenters. The lead should only briefly summarize the notable controversies. The notability of this particular controversy is measured by studies, documentaries, films, boycotts from influential persons based on the perception of bias, and numerous pop culture references to the alleged conservative bias. No other viewpoint has gained as much currency, and therefore including them in the lead would violate WP:FRINGE; WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD.

Concern: Does the article take any position regarding the allegations of bias?

Wikipedia takes no position on whether Fox News is biased. The introduction highlights the existence of a notable controversy concerning the perception that the network promotes conservative political positions. Neither the introduction nor the article takes a position on whether such a perception is accurate, we merely reflect the consensus of reliable independent sources.

Previous discussions: See archives 21, 19, 18, 17, 16 (Includes RfC) and 15.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Stations Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people.

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Brent Bozell and Tim Graham (5 September 2025). "Google Gives You Wikipedia Tilt on Cable News Channels". Townhall. Retrieved 5 September 2025. It's the same for Fox News Channel. The third paragraph in their Wikipedia entry begins: "It has been identified as engaging in biased and false reporting in favor of the Republican Party, its politicians, and conservative causes, while portraying the Democratic Party in a negative light.

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2026

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

{{subst:trim|1=

Remove the claim from NewsGuard in online news rally claiming news is fake and remove Butler Carl's author link Butler, Daniel M.; for citation 3.

{{}} ~2026-28388-2 (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done, a reference to a reliable source supports that claim. If you want it removed, please establish consensus with other editors before making another edit request. MosquitoDestroyer (talk | mosquitoes destroyed) 03:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Communication

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 January 2026 and 18 March 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Willschmidt11 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Arixuna (talk) 04:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fox isn't a news channel

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fox News, a cable network, does not hold a specific "news license," as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not license cable channels or websites, only broadcast stations. Fox Corporation owns the channel, which operates under general business and media regulations, not a specialized license to broadcast news. Mobiledan (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2026

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It needs to be changed from Fox News to Fox Propaganda ~2026-19111-24 (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate information

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The article presents inaccurate, biased, politically inspired information.

1 Controversies should be under controversies not the main 2 it is stated that Fox News willingly and knowingly reported misinformation such as with Covid 19 and climate change. These issues are not settled and the article is actually defamatory. ~2026-37429-49 (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The information is well sourced. O3000, Ret. (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I guess this is about the paragraph that starts with "The channel has knowingly endorsed false conspiracy theories to promote Republican and conservative causes." There are four cites to back up the climate change denial claim. The one I can access, Science Feedback says Fox mentioned a mini-ice-age prediction, says nothing about false conspiracy theories, and says ""UPDATE (24 Nov. 2018): Fox News has also updated its article. It now clarifies that “the Earth’s climate will remain unaffected ...” i.e. it is a poor source for what Wikipedia says. But dunno about the other cites. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

We avoid cites in the lead itself. But. there are numerous cites in the article of various conspiracy theories and misinformation spread by Fox News. A recent bit of misinfo today about the 250 "celebration" we won't bother adding. O3000, Ret. (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Fox News

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2026

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Communication

Fox isn't a news channel

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2026

Inaccurate information