Talk:Édouard de Laveleye

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

---

• Edouard de Laveleye → Édouard de Laveleye
• Edouard Dulaurier → Édouard Dulaurier
• Elodie Clouvel ‎ → Élodie Clouvel
• Eliane Droubry → Éliane Droubry
• Eliane de Meuse → Éliane de Meuse
• Etienne Chambaud → Étienne Chambaud
• Eric Alibert → Éric Alibert
• Eric Mouquet → Éric MouquetÉric Mouquet
• Eliane Radigue → Éliane Radigue
• Paul-Emile Janson → Paul-Émile Janson
• Emile Bertrand → Émile Bertrand
• Paul Emile Berthon → Paul Émile BerthonPaul Émile Berthon
• Emile Lessore → Émile Lessore
• Marie Etienne → Marie Étienne

– Per WP:FRMOS recent English book sources and previous. Belgian baron olympic committee founder; French Armenianologist; French pentathelete; Ivoirian swimmer; Belgian painter; French painter; French animal painter; French ambient musician; French modern composer; Belgian politician; French mineralogist; French lithographer; French ceramic artist. French poetess. As previous Talk:Élodie Yung, Talk:Édouard Deldevez. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

• Support for accuracy, and per recent outcomes. --BDD (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose These marks are not needed when used in English. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose No evidence that these forms are most commonly used in reliable sources. MOS is a guideline that does not trump policy. --Born2cycle (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

(1) For evidence please click to look at the article footnotes. (2) click policy has Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard, and Göttingen" In ictu oculi (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

• Support per encyclopedic correctness and previous outcomes. Comment: WP:AT states that "Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources." (btw, "poetess", never seen that one before). HandsomeFella (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
• Support per encyclopedic accuracy. We don't need "reliable English sources" to tell us what the correct French spelling is, one way or the other. As long as the redirects exist, there is no harm in using the correct form in the title. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
• Support: Per HandsomeFella. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
• Support per nom. – Michael (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.