Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23bde521ecb70b8

Jump to content

Talk:Doc Film Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:DOC Film Institute)
Latest comment: 17 hours ago by Gfusvh in topic Requested move 26 July 2026

File:Doc hori.tif Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
  • File:Doc hori.tif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Dfi bolex.tif has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Cachao poster.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Dfi history.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Chang still.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply



File:Genius of Chang Dai-chien Poster.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Genius of Chang Dai-chien Poster.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrongful deletion of article sections

[edit]

Two sections of this article were nominated (Cachao: Uno Mas and Genius of Chang Dai-Chien) for deletion because of copyright infraction, but they are taken from the DOC Film Website, that is cited as a reference. The only issue I see here is to add the exact reference, but I don't know how to do this. in the references.

The references are: http://docfilm.sfsu.edu/productions/cachao-uno-m-s and http://docfilm.sfsu.edu/productions/chang-dai-chien-california — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efibla (talkcontribs) 02:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I need a reply on these issue please User: Efibla —Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC). (Efibla (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

help with editing article

Hi,

How can I improve this article? All the events that are included actually happened. Thank you! (Efibla (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

No reply on article editing

[edit]

Hello, there are a couple of notices on this article that I am waiting a reply for since a few days ago. I need this to be solved soon regardless of the decision. But no one answers this talk page. What can I do now? (Efibla (talk) 04:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC))Reply

[edit]

I am trying to edit this article but I can see that there is no reply to the copyright issue. Can I as a user erase the content and reedit everything? (KivaJames (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC))Reply

Thank you for working on this issue; I've removed a little lingering content from there and from other sections, including some material closely paraphrased from .
In order for us to use content taken directly from the DOC Film Institute's publications, they will need to put a release on their website such as described at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality check

[edit]

Much of the language of this article does not sound neutral. Rather, it sounds like a press release or promotional material for its subject. It should be edited to maintain Wikipedia's policy of Neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.103.221.161 (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I edited the entry to remove as much non neutral language as I could, but there is sill the copyright issue unresolved. When will I get a reply? (KivaJames (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC))Reply

Requested move 16 July 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply


DOC Film InstituteDoc Film Institute – Per MOS:TM and MOS:CAPS, "DOC" here is a stylization, not an initialism, so the all-caps form should be normalized. Independent reliable sources and the organization itself render the name "Doc Film Institute". Gfusvh (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. 1isall (talk | contribs) 15:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support. I would also support moving to the unabbreviated name, Documentary Film Institute. pburka (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 26 July 2026

[edit]

Doc Film InstituteDocumentary Film Institute – Proposing to use the more formal complete name, as suggested in the previous RM discussion (and as found in the opening sentence of the Wikipedia article). The main page of the official website is headlined "Welcome to the Documentary Film Institute", and its opening sentence is "The Documentary Film Institute focuses on projects that ..." —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support Gfusvh (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply