Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21fdcbdc81b0acb

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the straw chamber say? I'm sucked into politics.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Straw tracker)

A straw chamber is a type of gaseous ionization particle detector. It is a long tube with a wire down the center and a gas which becomes ionized when a particle passes through. A potential difference is maintained between the wire and the walls of the tube, so that once the gas is ionized electrons move in one direction and ions in the other. This produces a current which indicates that a particle has passed through the chamber.[1]

Many straws chambers together can be used to track particles in a straw tracker. The path of a particle is determined by the best fit to all the straws with hits. Since the time for a particular straw to produce a signal is proportional to the distance of the particle's closest approach to that chamber's wire, if a particle on a predictable path (e.g. a helix in a magnetic field) passes through many straws, the path of the particle can be determined more precisely than the size of any particular straw.

Specific uses

[edit]

There are about 298,000 drift tubes (straws) in the Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) of the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Erni, W.; et al. (February 2013). "Technical design report for the PANDA (AntiProton Annihilations at Darmstadt) Straw Tube Tracker: Strong interaction studies with antiprotons". The European Physical Journal A. 49 (2): 23–38. arXiv:1205.5441. doi:10.1140/epja/i2013-13025-8.