Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a249bd344bcad96e

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeDid Samuel Gray's book have a gray area?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from S.F.Gray)

Samuel F. Gray

Samuel Frederick Gray (10 December 1766 – 12 April 1828) was a British botanist, mycologist, and pharmacologist. He was the father of the zoologists John Edward Gray and George Robert Gray.

Background

[edit]

He was the son of Samuel Gray, a London seedsman. He received no inheritance and, after failing to qualify for medicine, turned to medical and botanical writing. He married Elizabeth Forfeit in 1794 and moved to Walsall, Staffordshire, where he established an assay office before he moved back to London in 1800.

He set up an apothecary business in Wapping, which failed within a few years. Then, he seems to have maintained himself by writing and lecturing.[1]

Medical writings

[edit]

Gray wrote a Supplement to the Pharmacopoeia, published in 1818 with several subsequent editions.[2] In 1819, he became co-editor of the London Medical Repository, to which he contributed many articles on medical, botanical, and other topics. He published, in 1823, The Elements of Pharmacy and, in 1828, The Operative Chemist, both practical reference works.

The Natural Arrangement of British Plants

[edit]

Gray's major text of interest today is The Natural Arrangement of British Plants, published in two volumes in 1821.[3][4] The authorship is disputed, and his son, John Edward Gray, later claimed to have done most of the work, but that was not supported by his grandson. The book itself is innovative, being the first British flora to employ Antoine Laurent de Jussieu's natural system of plant classification, an improvement on the artificial classification of Linnaeus. Probably, that was what made it be poorly received by conservative botanists of the day.[1] The Natural Arrangement of British Plants also included substantial sections on fungi, then classed as cryptogamic plants, introducing many new genera, including Auriscalpium, Coltricia, Leccinum, and Steccherinum, which remain in current use.[5]

Despite its recognised nomenclatural importance today, it was neglected by British botanists after its publication for "its idiosyncrasies, anti-Linnaean character, unorthodox nomenclature, narrow generic concepts and contemporary hostility to the supposed author R. A. Salisbury."[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Browne, Janet. "Gray, Samuel Frederick". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/11353. (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
  2. Gray, Samuel Frederick (1836). A supplement to the Pharmacopia, and treatise on pharmacology in general : including not only the drugs and preparations used by practitioners of medicine, but also most of those employed in the chemical arts : together with a collection of the most useful medical formulæ ... Gerstein – University of Toronto. London : Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman.
  3. Gray 1821.
  4. Samuel Frederick Gray A natural arrangement of British Plants, according to their relations to each other, Volume 2 (1821) at Google Books
  5. "Index Fungorum - Search Page". www.indexfungorum.org.
  6. Stearn, William T. (1989). "S. F. Gray's "Natural Arrangement of British Plants" (1821)". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 167 (1): 22–34. doi:10.1007/BF00936544. S2CID 41191950.
  7. International Plant Names Index. Gray.

Bibliography

[edit]