Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23a009ecfe04a3e

Jump to content

Funny Games (1997 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Rolfi)

Funny Games
Austrian film poster
Directed byMichael Haneke
Written byMichael Haneke
Produced byVeit Heiduschka
Starring
CinematographyJürgen Jürges
Edited byAndreas Prochaska
Production
companies
Distributed byWega Film[1]
Release dates
  • 14 May 1997 (1997-05-14) (Cannes)
  • 11 September 1997 (1997-09-11) (Austria)[1]
Running time
109 minutes[2]
CountryAustria
LanguagesGerman
French

Funny Games is a 1997 Austrian satirical psychological thriller film written and directed by Michael Haneke, and starring Susanne Lothar, Ulrich Mühe, and Arno Frisch. The plot involves two young men who hold a family hostage in their vacation home and torture them with sadistic games.

The film was entered into the 1997 Cannes Film Festival, where it generated controversy among both critics and audiences for its depiction of graphic violence and torture.[3]

A shot-for-shot remake, filmed and set in the United States, was released in 2007, also directed by Haneke, this time with an English-speaking cast and a mostly American crew.

Plot

[edit]

George Schober, his wife Anna, their son Georgie, and their dog Rolfi arrive at their lakefront holiday home in Austria. On the drive over, they spot their next-door neighbors Fred and Eva accompanied by two young Viennese men whom they do not recognize. Upon arrival, they notice their daughter Sissi is absent. Fred visits minutes later with one of the men, whom he introduces as Paul, the son of a friend.

While George sets up the boat, the other young man Peter comes to Anna's kitchen to borrow eggs on Eva's behalf, only to drop them and knock the family's phone into the sink, seemingly done by accident.

Paul arrives shortly thereafter and decides to try one of George's golf clubs. Anna demands that the men leave, but Peter breaks George's leg with a golf club and reveals to Anna that they killed Rolfi before taking the family hostage.

Over the following hours, Peter and Paul subject the family to sadistic games. Paul places a bet that the family will not survive past 9:00 in the morning. He then puts a pillowcase over Georgie's head and pressures George to ask Anna to undress. She complies, only to be told to put her clothes back on.

Georgie escapes and flees to Fred's house, where he finds Sissi's corpse. Paul corners Georgie as Georgie attempts to shoot him, but the shotgun is unloaded. Paul returns Georgie to the home as Peter plays a counting-out game between the family while Paul makes sandwiches in the kitchen. Georgie panics and runs, which results in Peter shooting him dead. Paul berates Peter for being trigger-happy, and the two men decide to leave.

After grieving, Anna flees the house as George attempts to repair the malfunctioning phone. Anna tries to find help, but is captured by Peter and Paul and returned to the house.

During another game, Anna grabs the shotgun and kills Peter; however, Paul finds and uses a remote control to rewind the movie, "reversing" the events that just happened and preventing Peter's death from happening. Paul then shoots and kills George, and both men take Anna out on the family's boat early the next morning. Around 8:00, Paul nonchalantly pushes Anna into the water to drown, thus winning their bet. Paul arrives at Gerda's house and knocks on the door, asking for some eggs on Anna’s behalf. She heads to the kitchen as Paul stares at the camera and smirks.

Cast

[edit]

Themes

[edit]

The film frequently blurs the line between fiction and reality, especially highlighting the act of observation. The character Paul breaks the fourth wall five times throughout the film and addresses the camera in various ways. As he directs Anna to look for her dead dog, he turns, winks, and smirks at the camera. When he asks the family to bet on their survival, he turns to the camera and asks the audience whether they will bet as well. At the end of the film, when requesting eggs from the next family, he looks into the camera and smirks again. By addressing the audience, Haneke forces the viewer to acknowledge their complicity. Author Joanna Bourke states that through these fourth wall breaks, "audiences have to take responsibility for being desensitized to violence and the pain of others."[4]

Paul also frequently states his intentions to follow the standards of film plot development. When he asks the audience to bet, he guesses that the audience wants the family to win. After the killers vanish in the third act, Paul later explains that he had to give the victims a last chance to escape or else it would not be dramatic. Toward the end of the film, he postpones killing the rest of the family because the film has not yet reached feature length. Throughout the film, Paul shows awareness of the audience's expectations.

However, Paul also causes the film to defy convention on a number of occasions. In horror and thrillers, one protagonist that the audience can sympathize with usually survives, but here all three family members die. When Anna successfully shoots Peter, potentially initiating a heroic escape for the family, Paul uses a remote control to rewind the film itself and undo the event. After Peter shoots Georgie, Paul scolds him for killing the child first because it goes against convention and weakens whatever suspense remains in the storyline. At the end of the film, the murderers prevent Anna from using a knife in the boat to cut her bonds. An earlier close-up points out the knife's location as a possible set-up for a final-act escape, but this turns out to be a red herring. At the end of the film, Paul again smirks triumphantly at the audience. As a self-aware character, he is able to subvert viewer expectations and emerges triumphant.

After killing Anna, Peter and Paul argue about the line between reality and fiction. Paul believes fiction that is observed is just as real as anything else, but Peter dismisses this idea. Unlike Paul, Peter never demonstrates any awareness that he is a character in a film.

Haneke states that Funny Games was not intended to be a horror film. He says he wanted to deliver a message about violence in the media by making an incredibly violent, but otherwise pointless film. His short essay revealing how he felt on the issue—called "Violence + Media"—is included as a chapter in the book A Companion to Michael Haneke.[5]

Film scholar Brigitte Peucker argues that the film functions to "assault the spectator", adding: "On the surface, Funny Games appears to exemplify ... Stephen Prince's idea of responsibly filmmaking... but, by means of modernist strategies such as the direct look out of the frame, it establishes a complicity between the film's spectators and the murderers depicted in its narrative. It takes, therefore, an aggressive—not to say sadistic—posture toward its audience."[6]

Production

[edit]

Haneke wanted to make a film set in the United States, but for practical reasons he had to set it in Austria.[7]

After the 2007 American remake directed by Haneke used the same house including props and tones, Robert Koehler of Cineaste wrote that this "proves for certain that—whether he uses the great cinematographer Jürgen Jürges (for the 1997 version) or the great Darius Khondji (for the new film)—Haneke is fundamentally his own cinematographer exercising considerable control over the entire look of his films."[7]

Critical response

[edit]

European and English-language critics, according to Robert Koehler of Cineaste, "generally set their criticism against the backdrop of the American slasher film that the film was subverting" and "expressed mild forms of outrage along with admiration".[7] In an interview, film director and critic Jacques Rivette made his displeasure with the movie clear, calling it "a disgrace", "vile", and "a complete piece of shit."[8] When first shown at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival, one-third of the audience walked out.[9]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 73% based on reviews from 40 critics, with an average rating of 7.2/10. The site's critical consensus states: "Violent images and blunt audience provocation make up this nihilistic experiment from one of cinema's more difficult filmmakers".[10] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 69 out of 100 based on reviews from 10 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[11]

Variety's David Rooney wrote: "The film is shocking and upsetting, but never truly gets under the skin the way this kind of material often can. Whatever reservations are prompted by Haneke's approach, his direction is controlled and edgy." Rooney criticized the length of the film, saying it "outstays its welcome and is more than a little too knowing in its manipulation of standard audience expectations for the genre."[12]

In 2015, Taste of Cinema ranked the film among the "30 Great Psychopath Movies That Are Worth Your Time".[13]

Home media

[edit]

On 14 May 2019, the film was released on DVD and Blu-ray as part of the Criterion Collection.[14] In July 2025 the film was included in the Michael Haneke Collection Blu-ray which was put out by Umbrella Entertainment.[15]On October 6 2025 Curzon included the film in their Haneke collection box-set.[16]

American remake

[edit]

Haneke wrote and directed an American remake of the same name, released in 2007. It stars Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet and Naomi Watts.[17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 "Funny Games". Österreichisches Filminstitut (in German). Retrieved 9 July 2025.
  2. "Funny Games (18)". British Board of Film Classification. 13 March 1998. Retrieved 29 May 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  3. "Festival de Cannes: Funny Games". festival-cannes.com. Archived from the original on 10 July 2011. Retrieved 21 September 2009.
  4. Bourke, Joanna (September 2019). "Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke's Funny Games and the Structure of Cruelty". Body & Society. 25 (3): 136–152. doi:10.1177/1357034X19856092.
  5. Haneke, Michael (2010). "Violence and the Media". In Roy Grundmann (Ed.), A Companion to Michael Haneke, pp. 575–579. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8800-5
  6. Peucker 2007, p. 142.
  7. 1 2 3 Koehler, Robert (2008). "Funny Games". Cineaste. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013.
  8. Bonnaud, Frédéric (25 March 1998). "The Captive Lover - An Interview with Jacques Rivette". Senses of Cinema. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  9. Johnston, Sheila (8 June 2009). "Palme d'Or winner Michael Haneke: cruel to his characters and to us". A shock-sensation in Cannes, where it provoked mass walkouts
  10. "Funny Games". Rotten Tomatoes. 11 March 1998. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  11. "Funny Games". Metacritic. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  12. Rooney, David (25 May 1997). "Funny Games". Variety.
  13. Turer, Jason (9 April 2015). "30 Great Psychopath Movies That Are Worth Your Time". Taste of Cinema - Movie Reviews and Classic Movie Lists. Retrieved 8 March 2025.
  14. "Funny Games". The Criterion Collection. Retrieved 11 November 2025.
  15. "Michael Haneke Collection Blu-ray". Umbrella Entertainment. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  16. Powster. "Michael Haneke: A Curzon Collection". Curzon Film - Find The Latest Curzon Film Releases. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
  17. Gleiberman, Owen (12 March 2008). "Funny Games". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 10 January 2020.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]