Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd
 | This article needs more citations. (June 2026) |
 | This article may contain original research. (August 2025) |
| Re Smith and Fawcett Ltd. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of England and Wales |
| Citation | [1942] Ch 304 |
| Keywords | |
| Interests of the company | |
Re Smith and Fawcett Ltd. [1942] Ch 304 is a UK company law case, concerning the meaning of "the interests of the company". It is relevant for the provisions of company law now embodied in Companies Act 2006, section 172.
Facts
[edit] |
Article 10 of the company's constitution said that directors could refuse to register share transfers. Mr. Fawcett, one of the two directors and shareholders, had died. Mr. Smith co-opted another director and refused to register a transfer of shares to the late Mr. Fawcett’s executors. Half the shares were bought, and the other half offered to the executors.
Judgment
[edit]Lord Greene MR said:[1]
The principles to be applied in cases where the articles of a company confer a discretion on directors... are for the present purposes free from doubt. They must exercise their discretion bona fide in what they consider – not what a court may consider – is in the interests of the company and not for any collateral purpose. They must have regard to those considerations only which the articles on their true construction permit them to take into consideration.
— P. Heath, The Proper Purposes Doctrine, p. 307
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ Heath, P. "The Proper Purposes Doctrine — The Law and Its Implications" (PDF). Auckland University Law Review: 307 – via New Zealand Legal Information Institute.