Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21df9d59ccda68e

Jump to content

Rayleigh length

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Rayleigh range)
Gaussian beam width as a function of the axial distance . : beam waist; : confocal parameter; : Rayleigh length; : total angular spread

In optics and especially laser science, the Rayleigh length or Rayleigh range, , is the distance along the propagation direction of a beam from the waist to the place where the area of the cross section is doubled.[1] A related parameter is the confocal parameter, b, which is twice the Rayleigh length.[2] The Rayleigh length is particularly important when beams are modeled as Gaussian beams.

Explanation

[edit]

For a Gaussian beam propagating in free space along the axis with wave number , the Rayleigh length is given by[2]

where is the wavelength (the vacuum wavelength divided by , the index of refraction) and is the beam waist, the radial size of the beam at its narrowest point. This equation and those that follow assume that the waist is not extraordinarily small; .[3]

The radius of the beam at a distance from the waist is[4]

The minimum value of occurs at , by definition. At distance from the beam waist, the beam radius is increased by a factor and the cross sectional area by 2.

[edit]

The total angular spread of a Gaussian beam in radians is related to the Rayleigh length by[1]

The diameter of the beam at its waist (focus spot size) is given by

.

These equations are valid within the limits of the paraxial approximation. For beams with much larger divergence the Gaussian beam model is no longer accurate and a physical optics analysis is required.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Siegman, A. E. (1986). Lasers. University Science Books. pp. 664–669. ISBN 0-935702-11-3.
  2. 1 2 Damask, Jay N. (2004). Polarization Optics in Telecommunications. Springer. pp. 221–223. ISBN 0-387-22493-9.
  3. Siegman (1986) p. 630.
  4. Meschede, Dieter (2007). Optics, Light and Lasers: The Practical Approach to Modern Aspects of Photonics and Laser Physics. Wiley-VCH. pp. 46–48. ISBN 978-3-527-40628-9.