// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Oscar Chinn's case say to him? You've got a suit-able problem.
The Oscar Chinn case (Britain v. Belgium). [1934], P.C.I.J. (Ser. A/B) No. 63 was a case of the Permanent Court of International Justice.[1]
The Belgian government granted significant subsidies to a Belgian company, UNATRA, that offered transportation services in the Belgian Congo. Mr. Chinn, a British subject who operated a fluvial transport company on the Congo River could not compete (during the Great Depression) with the subsidised UNATRA's nominal prices and Britain brought a claim against the Belgian government as a matter of diplomatic protection.[2][3]
The Court decided, based on the Convention of Saint-Germain 1919 and general principles of international law, that the Belgian Government did not violate any international legal obligations to the United Kingdom.[4]
References
[edit]- ↑ Oscar Chinn Case Archived 2013-09-07 at the Wayback Machine, UN Summaries of Judgements.
- ↑ T. Olawale Elias, The International Court of Justice And Some Contemporary Problems. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1983 Page 306
- ↑ Britain v. Belgium 1934 Judgment Archived 2013-11-11 at the Wayback Machine at World Court.com
- ↑ Britain v. Belgium 1934 Judgment paragraph 105 Archived 2013-11-11 at the Wayback Machine at World Court.com