// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the orientation sheaf say? I'm aligned with my thoughts.

In the mathematical field of algebraic topology, the orientation sheaf on a manifold X of dimension n is a locally constant sheaf o_X on X such that the stalk of o_X at a point x is the local homology group

$o_{X,x}=\operatorname {H} _{n}(X,X-\{x\})$

(in the integer coefficients or some other coefficients).

Let $\Omega _{M}^{k}$ be the sheaf of differential k-forms on a manifold M. If n is the dimension of M, then the sheaf

${\mathcal {V}}_{M}=\Omega _{M}^{n}\otimes {\mathcal {o}}_{M}$

is called the sheaf of (smooth) densities on M. The point of this is that, while one can integrate a differential form only if the manifold is oriented, one can always integrate a density, regardless of orientation or orientability; there is the integration map:

$\textstyle \int _{M}:\Gamma _{c}(M,{\mathcal {V}}_{M})\to \mathbb {R} .$

If M is oriented; i.e., the orientation sheaf of the tangent bundle of M is literally trivial, then the above reduces to the usual integration of a differential form.

See also

• There is also a definition in terms of dualizing complex in Verdier duality; in particular, one can define a relative orientation sheaf using a relative dualizing complex.

References

• Kashiwara, Masaki; Schapira, Pierre (2002), Sheaves on Manifolds, Berlin: Springer, ISBN 3540518614

External links

• Two kinds of orientability/orientation for a differentiable manifold