Module talk:Sports table
Add topic | Module:Sports table is indefinitely protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sports table module. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the following pages redirect here: |
Winning percentage four digits
[edit]Can an option be done for goal percentage with 4 digits, for example like the win percentage with notratio setting?
I need help if there is another notratio code for goal percentage please, anyone who can help me?
Example
[edit]| Pos | Team | Pld | W | L | GF | GA | PP | PCT | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South East Melbourne Phoenix | 8 | 6 | 2 | 686 | 636 | 107.9 | 75.00 | Semi-Finals |
| 2 | Melbourne United | 11 | 8 | 3 | 931 | 830 | 112.2 | 72.73 | |
| 3 | Perth Wildcats | 10 | 7 | 3 | 880 | 809 | 108.8 | 70.00 | |
| 4 | Illawarra Hawks | 11 | 6 | 5 | 962 | 966 | 99.6 | 54.55 | |
| 5 | Tasmania JackJumpers | 11 | 5 | 6 | 834 | 837 | 99.6 | 45.45 | |
| 6 | Sydney Kings | 12 | 5 | 7 | 959 | 987 | 97.2 | 41.67 | |
| 7 | Brisbane Bullets | 10 | 4 | 6 | 844 | 880 | 95.9 | 40.00 | |
| 8 | Adelaide 36ers | 10 | 4 | 6 | 805 | 854 | 94.3 | 40.00 | |
| 9 | Cairns Taipans | 6 | 2 | 4 | 459 | 484 | 94.8 | 33.33 | |
| 10 | New Zealand Breakers | 11 | 3 | 8 | 866 | 943 | 91.8 | 27.27 |
Giacontigers (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2022 (AEDT)
Total points
[edit]Hello again. The time has come when it is really necessary to add a user-defined parameter for the number of points. See this table: 2026 FINA Women's Water Polo World Cup#League phase. Some poor old user there was trying all sorts of crazy tricks to achieve the desired total points. I think this is unacceptable; we should do what I suggested above. Thanks, Maiō T. (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
|adjust_points=already exists and seemed to work just fine. In my opinion, the real issue here is that FINA used a relatively opaque algorithm to calculate points in this; I cannot find where the method of calculating the "Tournament Performance Index" is defined. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Withdrawal?
[edit]Is it possible to replace the entire row of win/draw/loss totals with a merged cell saying "Withdrew" or other custom text? I came across this issue with Syria's involvement in the UEFA qualification pathway for the 1966 World Cup (see here). Instead of showing zeros, it would be much more useful to state that Syria withdrew after being drawn into Group 9. – PeeJay 16:06, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
- Does this case really need a template when it could easily be replaced by prose? "Group 9 was drawn to comprise Spain, the Republic of Ireland and Syria. Before any games were played Syria withdraw from the competition. Spain and Ireland played each other twice with Spain qualifying for the finals 4-2 on aggregate."
- If you really want a table try Module:Sports table/Custom to see if that will work for you. Nthep (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Because that is just not what happened. They did treat it as a group stage with two and when the two finished with the same points, an extra play-off game was organized between them. The same thing happened in group 1. Tvx1 08:32, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Same solution, use prose. "Group 9 was drawn to comprise Spain, the Republic of Ireland and Syria. Before any games were played Syria withdraw from the competition. Spain and Ireland played each other twice each winning one so both teams went into a play off."
- Not everything is best presented in tables. Nthep (talk) 09:20, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Because that is just not what happened. They did treat it as a group stage with two and when the two finished with the same points, an extra play-off game was organized between them. The same thing happened in group 1. Tvx1 08:32, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wasn't there a status letter denoting withdrawals? We can use "W", then have a footnote as well to drive home the point. There were some tables that colored black/gray the row for the team that withdrew. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Incorrect Sorting of the Position in 2025–26 EFL League One
[edit]Hello, in the table for the 2025–26 EFL League One, the order of the positions is incorrect in one place. Rotherham United has 41 points and is in 22nd place. Port Vale has 42 points and is in 23rd place, even though they have one more point. In the original table in efl.com, both teams are listed in the correct positions. Could someone please look into this and correct it? Abu-Dun Talk 20:40, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- The table order is set by the
|team_order =parameter. I corrected it, but you should be able to make the fix yourself in the future. Wburrow (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2026 (UTC)- Thanks, I actually overlooked that when I was checking it. Abu-Dun Talk 22:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Points
[edit]Please add the actual total points for each team to this table: 2026 World Aquatics Women's U16 Water Polo Championships#Group stage. You can find the source below the table. Thanks, Maiō T. (talk) 23:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC)