Template talk:Gs
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gs template. |
|
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
| To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all Gs/* template talk pages redirect here. If you are here to discuss one of the Gs/* templates, please be sure to identify which one. The Arbitration Committee's contentious topics templates should be discussed at Template talk:Contentious topics. |
Template-protected edit request to Template:Gs/alert
[edit]This edit request to Template:Gs/alert has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could you please change the following in Template:Gs/alert:
| − | Reverts of edits made by anonymous | + | Reverts of edits made by anonymous editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. |
As of 2025, IP addresses are no longer used for attribution. TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 05:13, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Technically speaking, all users are anonymous (barring those who explicitly link their real-life identities). If any change is to be made, it should probably be changing
anonymous IP editors
tounregistered temporary accounts
or similar. Closing the request until more accurate wording gets consensus for implementation. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)- Can you change it to that instead? TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 02:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it's fairly uncontroversial. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Can you change it to that instead? TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 02:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Dark mode problems
[edit]I'm getting white text on white background from this template when I go to e.g. . There must be some CSS weirdness, as that does not happen when I look at Template:Gs/editnotice. -- Beland (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 17 May 2026
[edit]This edit request to Template:Gs/editnotice has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On line 1, please change:
| − | <noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}}</noinclude><includeonly>{{#invoke:Sanctions|editnotice}}{{#if:{{{nocat|}}}||[[Category: | + | <noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}}</noinclude><includeonly>{{#invoke:Sanctions|editnotice}}{{#if:{{{nocat|}}}||[[Category:Community-authorised discretionary sanctions editnotices|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]}}</includeonly><noinclude> |
per the CfD discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 4#Category:Pages with editnotices. Please also update the documentation once completed, or ping me so I can update it. Staraction (talk · contribs) 06:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 25 July 2026
[edit]This edit request to Module:Sanctions has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please delete the following bullet point An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
as proposed in the sandbox. The reason is because of the awareness repeal in June 2026. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 04:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)