Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25841428ec8610f

Jump to content

Template talk:Dot chart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Module talk:Dot chart)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by BrandonXLF in topic Dark mode (resolved)

Change content model to wikitext and redirect to Template:Dot chart/testcases. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Pppery: umm, why? Is that page even needed at all (a module that does nothing). — xaosflux Talk 01:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
You'd have to ask BrandonXLF why he created this page. It isn't really needed, but my reasoning for this edit request is that the purpose of Module:Dot chart/testcases is to direct visitors to Template:Dot chart/testcases, a purpose which a redirect is much more effective at fulfilling than a Lua comment. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Declined. I don't think a redirect would be useful  Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dark mode (resolved)

[edit]

On dark mode the text is very nearly the same color as the background and not readable. The template seems to be used in zero pages since its release 6 years ago. Is it still in development? Hesistant to fix a template if TfD is on the horizon. Courtesy ping to primary author BrandonXLF in case this is no longer watch-listed. Reported here: Rjjiii (talk) 23:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Rjjiii Thanks for the heads up, I've fixed the dark mode text issue. I do plan on improving the template in the future and evaluating its usefulness, but it is ready to be used / released. BrandonXLF (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply