Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f92253c06ddf0

Jump to content

Meredith effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Meredith Effect)
The North American P-51 Mustang makes significant use of the Meredith effect in its belly radiator design.[1]

The Meredith effect is a phenomenon whereby the aerodynamic drag produced by a cooling radiator may be offset by careful design of the cooling duct such that useful thrust is produced by the expansion of the hot air in the duct. The effect was discovered in the 1930s and became more important as the speeds of piston-engined aircraft increased over the next decade.

History

[edit]

F. W. Meredith was a British engineer working at the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE), Farnborough. Reflecting on the principles of liquid cooling, he realized that what was conventionally regarded as waste heat, to be transferred to the atmosphere by a coolant in a radiator, need not be lost. The heat adds energy to the airflow and, with careful design, this may be used to generate thrust. The work was published in 1935.[2]

The phenomenon became known as the "Meredith effect" and was quickly adopted by the designers of prototype fighter aircraft then under development, including the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane whose Rolls-Royce PV-12 engine, later named the Merlin, was cooled by ethylene glycol. An early example of a Meredith effect radiator was incorporated in the design of the Spitfire for the first flight of the prototype on 5 March 1936.[3]

Many engineers did not understand the operating principles of the effect. A common mistake was the idea that the air-cooled radial engine would benefit most, because its fins ran hotter than the radiator of a liquid-cooled engine, with the mistake persisting even as late as 1949.[4]

A significant debate on the origin and effectiveness of the principle arose as a result of an article written by Lee Atwood in the 1990s. The article generated rebuttals in both the AAHS Journal and the Friends Journal of the Air Force Museum Foundation.[5][6]

Explanation

[edit]

The Meredith effect occurs when air flowing through a duct is heated by a heat-exchanger or radiator containing a hot working fluid. Typically the fluid is a coolant carrying waste heat from an internal combustion engine.[4]

P-51 radiator duct schematic diagram: 1 - air duct flap control system, 2 - air intake, 3 - oil radiator, 4 - oil radiator air exhaust, 5 - engine coolant radiator, 6 - air duct flaps, 7 - main air exhaust.

The duct must be travelling at a significant speed with respect to the air for the effect to occur. Air flowing into the duct meets drag resistance from the radiator surface and is compressed due to the ram air effect. As the air flows through the radiator it is heated, raising its temperature slightly and increasing its volume. The hot, pressurised air then exits through the exhaust duct which is shaped to be convergent, i.e. to narrow towards the rear. This accelerates the air backwards and the reaction of this acceleration against the installation provides a small forward thrust.[2] The air expands and decreases temperature as it passes along the duct, before emerging to join the external air flow. Thus, the three processes of an open Brayton cycle are achieved: compression, heat addition at constant pressure, and expansion. The thrust obtainable depends upon the pressure ratio between the inside and outside of the duct and the temperature of the coolant.[4] The higher boiling point of ethylene glycol compared to water allows the air to attain a higher temperature increasing the specific thrust.

If the generated thrust is less than the aerodynamic drag of the ducting and radiator, then the arrangement serves to reduce the net aerodynamic drag of the radiator installation. If the generated thrust exceeds the aerodynamic drag of the installation, then the entire assemblage contributes a net forward thrust to the vehicle.

The Meredith effect inspired the early American work on the aero-thermodynamic duct or ramjet, due to the similarity of their principles of operation.[4] In more recent times the phenomenon has been utilised in racing cars by mounting the engine cooling radiators in tunnels.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Yenne, Bill (1989). Rockwell: The Heritage of North American. New York: Crescent Books. p. 49. ISBN 0-517-67252-9.
  2. 1 2 Meredith, F.W. (14 August 1935). Cooling of Aircraft Engines with Special Reference to Ethylene Glycol Radiators Enclosed in Ducts. Reports and Memoranda (Report). Aeronautical Research Committee. R&M 1683. Retrieved 23 July 2026.
  3. Gingell, G., ed. (1976), The Supermarine Spitfire: 40 Years On, Royal Aeronautical Society, p. 13
  4. 1 2 3 4 Becker, John V. (1980). "Chapter 5: High-speed Cowlings, Air Inlets and Outlets, and Internal-Flow Systems" (PDF). The High-Speed Frontier: Case Histories of Four NACA Programs, 1920-1950. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. pp. 161–165. SP-445. Retrieved 23 July 2026.
  5. Garrison, Peter (2 July 2015). "In the Mustang's Wake". HistoryNet. Archived from the original on 30 October 2015. Retrieved 23 July 2026.
  6. Atwater, J. Leland (Winter 1995), "The "Spitfire" and the "Mustang": The Meredith Mystery", Friends Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, Air Force Museum Foundation, pp. 18–20 For a copy of the article, see a forum thread.
  7. Oxley, Mat (9 March 2021). "Is Ducati Using Ground Effect for More Grip in MotoGP?". Motor Sport. Retrieved 23 July 2026.
[edit]