Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25488a0486ca23e

Jump to content

Martin–Schultz scale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Martin-Schultz scale)
Martin-Schultz scale

The Martin–Schultz scale is a standard color scale commonly used in physical anthropology to establish more or less precisely the eye color of an individual; it was created by the anthropologists Rudolf Martin and Bruno K Schultz in the first half of the 20th century. The scale consists of 20 colors[1] (from light blue to dark brown-black) that correspond to the different eye colors observed in nature due to the amount of melanin in the iris (in this case, the lower the number, the lighter the eye color):[2][3]

Color Name Martin–Schultz scale
pale-blue iris 1a
light-blue iris 1b
sky-blue iris 1c
blue iris 2a
dark-blue iris 2b
blue-gray iris 3
light-gray iris 4a
dark-gray iris 4b
blue-gray iris with yellow/brown spots 5
gray-green iris with yellow/brown spots 6
green iris 7
green iris with yellow/brown spots 8
amber iris 9
hazel iris 10
light-brown iris 11
medium-brown iris 12
dark-brown iris 13
mahogany iris 14
black-brown iris 15
black iris 16

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. "Martin-Schulz Eye Color Chart". Archived from the original on 2016-08-02. Retrieved 2017-01-13.
  2. Piquet-Thepot M.-M. - Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, XII° Série, tome 3 fascicule 3, pg. 207,208 - (1968)
  3. Piquet-Thepot, M.-M. (26 March 1968). "Contribution à l'anthropologie des Corses : Anthropologie de la tête (suite)". Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris. 3 (3): 183–218. doi:10.3406/bmsap.1968.1417.