Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45765e85c411330

Jump to content

Elbe Germanic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Irminonic languages)

Elbe Germanic
Irminonic, Erminonic
Geographic
distribution
German-speaking Europe
EthnicityIrminones
Linguistic classificationIndo-European
Proto-languageProto-Elbe Germanic
Subdivisions
Language codes
The distribution of the primary Germanic languages in Europe c. AD 1:
  North Sea Germanic, or Ingvaeonic
  Weser–Rhine Germanic, or Istvaeonic
  Elbe Germanic, or Irminonic

Elbe Germanic, also called Irminonic or Erminonic, is a proposed subgrouping of West Germanic languages introduced by the German linguist Friedrich Maurer (1898–1984) in his book, Nordgermanen und Alemanen, to describe the West Germanic dialects ancestral to Lombardic, Alemannic, and Bavarian.[1]: 17–18  During late antiquity and the Middle Ages, its supposed descendants had a profound influence on the neighboring West Central German dialects and, later, in the form of Standard German, on the German language as a whole.[2] While most scholars accept the existence of an Elbe Germanic archaeological group, the existence of a linguistic group remains controversial.[3]

Nomenclature

[edit]

The term Irminonic is derived from the Irminones, a culturo-linguistic grouping of Germanic tribes that was mentioned by Tacitus in his Germania.[4] Pliny the Elder further specified its meaning by claiming that the Irminones lived "in the interior", meaning not close to the Rhine or North Sea.[5][full citation needed] Maurer used Pliny to refer to the dialects spoken by the Suevi, Bavarii, Alemanni and Lombards around the Hercynian Forest and the Northeastern German plain.[2]

Theory

[edit]

Maurer asserted that the cladistic tree model, which was used ubiquitously in linguistics in the 19th and the early 20th centuries, was too inaccurate to describe the relation between the modern Germanic languages, especially those belonging to its Western branch. Rather than depicting Old English, Old Dutch, Old Saxon, Old Frisian and Old High German to have simply 'branched off' a single common 'Proto-West Germanic', which many previous linguists equated to "Old German / Urdeutsch", he assumed that there had been much more distance between certain dialectal groupings and proto-languages.[6]: 113–114 

Maurer's classification of Germanic dialects

Linguists do not generally support Maurer's theory. Current scholarship is less inclined to propose distinct proto-languages to explain the lack of unity in West Germanic, instead relying on the notion of a dialect continuum.[7] There is no linguistic evidence that separates supposed Weser-Rhine Germanic languages from supposed Elbe Germanic languages.[8][9] Furthermore, cultural and archaeological groupings do not necessarily correspond to linguistic divisions, and Maurer's theory requires common West Germanic linguistic innovations to be later developments that spread to all West Germanic languages.[10][11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Fulk, R.D. (15 September 2018). A Comparative Grammar of the Early Germanic Languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 978-90-272-6313-1.
  2. 1 2 Maurer, Friedrich (1942). Nordgermanen und Alemannen: Studien zur germanische und frühdeutschen Sprachgeschichte, Stammes- und Volkskunde. Strasbourg: Hünenburg.
  3. ↑ Mildenberger, Gerhard; Beck, Heinrich (2010) [1989]. "Elbgermanen". Germanische Altertumskunde Online.
  4. ↑ Tacitus, Cornelius (2025) [c. 98 CE]. "Chapter 2". The Origin and Situation of the Germans. Translated by Church, Alfred; William Jackson Brodribb. Wikidata Q110624218. Retrieved 2 January 2025.
  5. ↑ Plin. Nat. 4.28
  6. ↑ Hoops, Johannes; Beck, Heinrich; Geuenich, Dieter; Steuer, Heiko (1989). Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde. Vol. 7. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110114454.
  7. ↑ Stiles 2013, pp. 12–17.
  8. ↑ Seebold 2006.
  9. ↑ Harm 2013.
  10. ↑ Fulk 2018, p. 17.
  11. ↑ Beck 2003, p. 1065.

General references

[edit]