Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21bc5f1aa48ad68

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did Inferential Role Semantics go to therapy? It had a lot to infer.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Inferentialism)

Inferential role semantics (also conceptual role semantics, functional role semantics, procedural semantics, semantic inferentialism) is an approach to the theory of meaning that identifies the meaning of an expression with its relationship to other expressions (typically its inferential relations with other expressions), in contradistinction to denotationalism, according to which denotations are the primary sort of meaning.[1]

Overview

[edit]

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is considered an early proponent of what is now called inferentialism.[2][3] He believed that the ground for the axioms and the foundation for the validity of the inferences are the right consequences and that the axioms do not explain the consequence.[3]

In its current form, inferential role semantics originated in the work of Wilfrid Sellars.

Contemporary proponents of semantic inferentialism include Robert Brandom,[4][5] Gilbert Harman,[6] Paul Horwich, Ned Block,[7] and Luca Incurvati.[8]

Jerry Fodor coined the term "inferential role semantics" in order to criticise it as a holistic (i.e. essentially non-compositional) approach to the theory of meaning. Inferential role semantics is sometimes contrasted to truth-conditional semantics.

Semantic inferentialism is related to logical expressivism[9] and semantic anti-realism.[10] The approach also bears a resemblance to accounts of proof-theoretic semantics in the semantics of logic, which associate meaning with the reasoning process.

References

[edit]
  1. Proof-Theoretic Semantics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  2. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik Vol. II, Meiner, 1975 [1932], pp. 466 and 474.
  3. 1 2 P. Stekeler-Weithofer (2016), "Hegel's Analytic Pragmatism" Archived 2020-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, University of Leipzig, pp. 122–4.
  4. "Pragmatism and Inferentialism"
  5. Brandom, Robert (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press. p. 230. ISBN 0-674-00158-3.
  6. "(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics" by Gilbert Harman
  7. "Conceptual Role Semantics" by Ned Block
  8. "EXPRESS | From the Expression of Disagreement to New Foundations for Expressivist Semantics". Inferential Expressivism project website. A project funded by the European Research Council
  9. J. Peregrin, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, Springer, 2014, ch. 10.
  10. R. Ramanujam, Sundar Sarukkai (eds.), Logic and Its Applications, Springer, 2009, p. 260.
[edit]