Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a431ecc539c586cd

Jump to content

German philosophy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from German Philosophy)

German philosophy is philosophy in Germany, by German people, and in the German language, a part of German culture.

German philosophers are central to major philosophical movements such as rationalist Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, German idealists and romanticists such as Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, dialectical materialist Karl Marx, and existentialist Friedrich Nietzsche.[1][2][3]

German philosophy influenced both contemporary philosophical schools: analytic philosophy such as Gottlob Frege, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and the logical positivist Vienna Circle; and continental phenomenology and hermeneutics such as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Frankfurt School critical theory. Heidegger and Wittgenstein are two of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century. Naturally, most German universities study continental philosophy.

Middle ages

[edit]
Carolingian manuscript, c. 831. Rabanus Maurus (left), with Alcuin (middle), dedicating his work to Archbishop Otgar of Mainz (right)

Medieval philosophy was often Christian philosophy and tied to theology. The first German philosophical controversy happened during the Carolingian Renaissance in the year 848,[a] when the deacon at the Benedictine Abbey of Fulda in Hesse, Rabanus Maurus (c. 780–856), known as "the first teacher of Germany", and a student of Charlemagne's preferred scholar Alcuin of York, responded to Gottschalk of Orbais' doctrine of double predestination.[5][6]

Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism

[edit]

Latin literacy had declined so much that Notker Labeo (c. 950–1022) translated the Roman Neoplatonist Boethius, Capella, and some Aristotle, inventing the first German philosophical vocabulary.[7][8][b]

The few twelfth-century Renaissance German philosophers during the High Middle Ages begin with Hugh of Saint Victor (c. 1096–1141), who studied at the abbey of Saint Victor in Paris, and was a Neoplatonic mystic influenced by Plato's Timaeus and Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, the "progenitor of ... negative theology."[12][13][14]

Otto of Freising (c. 1111–1158) was likely Hugh's student[15][16] and introduced to Germans the new, complete logic of Aristotle.[17] Hugh also influenced Italian Peter Lombard (c. 1096–1160), author of the Sentences (c. 1150).[18][19]

Neoplatonist nun and polymath Hildegard von Bingen (c. 1098–1179) called the "Sibyl of the Rhine" knew Latin and wrote on theology, cosmology, and natural philosophy (science).[c] In works like Scivias (1151), she wrote God infused life with greenness.[21]

Albert the Great

[edit]
Saint Albert the Great, in a fresco by Tomaso da Modena (1352).

Aristotle's other works became available from translators in Spain, one of whom was Herman the German. The most eminent German Scholastic, Dominican friar Saint Albert the Great (c. 1200–1280), taught the Physics and Nicomachean Ethics at Paris and Cologne.[22][23][24] He influenced students such as Neoplatonist Theodoric of Freiberg (c. 1250–c. 1311),[25] Italian Aristotelian Saint Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274),[26] and Aristotle translator William of Moerbeke (c. 1225–c. 1286).[27]

German Dominicans were usually Albertists, Aristotelians with a blend of Neoplatonism like Theodoric, such as Ulrich (c. 1225–1277) and Hugh Ripelin of Strassburg (c. 1205–c. 1270).[28]

Albertists were contrasted with the purely Aristotelian Thomists following Aquinas,[29] such as John of Lichtenberg (c. 1275–c. 1315), Heinrich of Lübeck, Heinrich of Gorkum (c. 1378–1431), Nicholas and Thomas of Strassburg (c. 1275–c. 1357), and John (c. 1280–c. 1340) and Gerhard of Sterngassen.[30] The Paulinerkirche at Göttingen housed relics of Aquinas.[31]

British Franciscan Duns Scotus (c. 1265–1308) died shortly after coming to teach in Cologne, buried at the Church of the Friars Minor;[32] and had limited influence in Germany, despite exceptions such as Scotist Heinrich von Werl (c. 1400–c. 1463).[4] Henry the German (c. 1245–1340) was an Augustinian hermit.[33]

Meister Eckhart

[edit]
Meister Eckhart in a posthumous portrait by Andrea di Bonaiuto (c. 1366)

Meister Eckhart (c. 1260–c. 1328), an influential Neoplatonic mystic at Cologne, wrote the Book of Divine Consolation.[34] Eckhart combined Theodoric's mysticism with the non-philosophical mysticism found among beguine orders, like Mechthild of Magdeburg (c. 1207–c. 1282), author of The Flowing Light of the Godhead.[4][35][36]

Meister Eckhart was posthumously condemned for heresy, and defended by Henry Suso (1295–1366).[37] Eckhart influenced the Friends of God and Brabantine priest John of Ruusbroec (1294–1381),[38] who influenced the Brethren of the Common Life and Devotio Moderna proponent Thomas à Kempis (c. 1380–1471), author of The Imitation of Christ.[39]

Albertist Berthold of Moosburg succeeded Eckhart at Cologne,[40] influencing Johannes Tauler (c. 1300–1361)[41] and Heymeric de Campo (1395–1460).[42] A contemporary Thomist at Cologne was Lambertus de Monte (c. 1430–1499).[43]

Modistae

[edit]

Thomas of Erfurt was the most influential of the Aristotelian so called modistae or speculative grammarians arguing for realism on the problem of universals across 14th-century Northern Europe.[44][45][d]

German Renaissance

[edit]

Nominalism

[edit]
Karolinum – the oldest building at the University of Prague.

British Franciscan William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347) spent his final years taking refuge with Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor at the Alter Hof in Munich.[46][47] Ockham's nominalism proved influential in Germany, especially after the Schism of 1378 caused scholars to leave France.[4][48] The first university in the Holy Roman Empire was the University of Prague (1347), modeled after the University of Paris, then influenced by Ockhamist Jean Buridan.[49]

Albert of Saxony

[edit]

Buridan's student Albert of Saxony (c. 1320–1390) became first rector at the second, the University of Vienna (1365).[50] He was a logician and natural philosopher who contributed a theory of impetus, a precursor to inertia in physics.[50]

Henry of Langenstein (c. 1325–1397), who with Henry of Oyta (c. 1330–1397) followed Albert of Saxony at the University of Vienna, taught Ockham's conciliar theory.[51][52] Albert of Saxony's student Marsilius of Inghen (c. 1340–1396) became first rector at the third German university, the University of Heidelberg (1386).[53] The Dominican Cologne was converted to a studium generale (c. 1388) and was the fourth.[4]

Gabriel Biel

[edit]

Another notable German Ockhamist was University of Tübingen professor Gabriel Biel (c. 1420–1495),[54] both an "articulate spokesman of the via moderna and … a discerning user of the ... via antiqua".[55]

Humanism

[edit]
Albrecht Dürer's Portrait of Erasmus (1526)

Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464) and Dutchman Desiderius Erasmus (c. 1466–1536) were major figures of Northern Renaissance and German Renaissance humanism, along with Conrad Celtis (1459–1508), [56] realist Johann Heynlin (c. 1425–1496),[57] and Johann Reuchlin (1455–1522),[58] who advocated teaching Greek and Hebrew, writing on the Jewish mysticism of Kabbalah in De Arte Cabalistica (1517).[59]

Contemporaneously, Johannes Gutenberg (1406–1468) invented the printing press and created the Gutenberg Bible (c. 1455), marking the start of the Gutenberg Revolution and age of the printed book in the Western world.[60]

Nicholas of Cusa

[edit]

A student of Heymeric de Campo,[61] Nicholas of Cusa was a mystic affirming the coincidentia oppositorum and denying the law of non-contradiction.[62] His work Of Learned Ignorance (1440) maintains the finite, human mind cannot fully know the infinite, divine mind, but can nonetheless attain "learned ignorance".[40]

Erasmus

[edit]

Desiderius Erasmus was a skeptic and scholar of medieval Christianity[63] best known for works like The Praise of Folly (1511) and Handbook of a Christian Knight (1501).[64] Erasmus was charged by contemporaries with “laying the egg that Luther hatched.”[65]

Luther and the Reformation

[edit]
Portrait of Martin Luther

University of Wittenberg professor Martin Luther (1483–1546) started the Reformation and is one of the most influential figures in Western and Christian history.[66][67]

Luther's German translation of the Bible made it vastly more accessible to the laity, having a wide impact on both the Church and German culture. Luther sparked an international debate on indulgences and other Church practices in works like Ninety-five Theses (1517). According to Philip Melanchthon (1497–1560), they were posted on the door of All Saint's Church.[68]

Protestantism and Lutheranism held salvation was achieved by faith alone (sola fide) and through God alone (monergism). While Luther praised reason as "the best and something divine,"[69] he saw it as inadequate in achieving knowledge of God, calling reason "the Devil's harlot".[70]

Erasmus argued against Luther in On Free Will (1524), defending free will and synergism. Led by Erasmus's former assistant Œcolampadius (1482–1531), Basel adopted the Reformation in 1529, deposing elected Catholic councilmen.[71] Erasmus fled to Catholic university town Freiburg, receiving the protection of his former student, Archduke Ferdinand of Austria.[72] Erasmus influenced German Anabaptists such as Balthasar Hubmaier (1480–1528).[73]

Ramism

[edit]

The doctrines of French logician, education reformer, and Protestant convert Petrus Ramus (1515–1572) known as Ramism influenced Germans such as Freigius (1543–1583), Caspar Olevian (1536–1587) and Johannes Piscator (1536–1625).[74] Ramist and Melanchthon follower Rudolph Goclenius (1547–1628) taught humanist Otto Casmann (1562–1607), a Protestant convert who attempted Mosaic physics.[75]

Hermeticism

[edit]

Trithemius

[edit]

Humanist and mystic hermeticist Johannes Trithemius (1462–1516) taught Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim (1486–1535) and Paracelsus (1493–1541).[76][77]

Agrippa von Nettesheim

[edit]
Portrait of Paracelsus by Augustin Hirschvogel

The Albertists and Erasmus also influenced Nettesheim.[78] His Three Books of Occult Philosophy (1533) was widely influential among esotericists, and condemned as heretical by Thomist Conrad Koellin (1476–1536), inquisitor of Cologne.[79] His skepticism also proved influential, found in On the Uncertainty and Vanity of the Arts and Sciences: An Invective Declamation (1530).[80]

Paracelsus

[edit]

Paracelsus was an alchemist, Medical Renaissance pioneer called the "father of toxicology".[81] In addition to Aristotle's four classical elements (earth, water, air, and fire), Paracelsus added three principles (sulphur, mercury, and salt), which he thought contained the poisons contributing to all diseases.[82] Gerhard Dorn (c. 1530–1584), Oswald Croll (c. 1563–1609), Andreas Libavius (c. 1550–1616), Heinrich Khunrath (c. 1560–1605), and Valentin Weigel (1533–1588) helped popularize his work.[83][84]

Valentin Weigel

[edit]

Valentin Weigel also followed religious radicals Thomas Müntzer (c. 1489–1525), Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt (1486–1541), Sebastian Franck (1499–c. 1543), and Caspar Schwenckfeldt (1490–1561), who believed Christ could be known internally, without reading.[85] Pietist predecessor Johann Arndt (1555–1621) and Pietist Gottfried Arnold (1666–1714) helped spread Valentin Weigel's ideas.[86]

17th century

[edit]

Kepler

[edit]
Kepler's Platonic solid model of the Solar System, from Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596)

Melanchthon taught the Wittenberg interpretation of Copernicus, influencing mathematicians Philipp Apian and Michael Maestlin, who taught natural philosopher Johannes Kepler (1571–1630), a seminal figure in the Scientific Revolution and heliocentrist Copernican Revolution,[87] known for his laws of planetary motion,[88] found in such books as Astronomia nova (1609), Harmonice Mundi (1619), and Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae.

In Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596) Kepler proposed the distances between the planets track the five Platonic solids.[89] Kepler also wrote the Rudolphine Tables (1627), based on the data and measurements of Dane Tycho Brahe (1546–1601).[90]

Böhme

[edit]

Influenced by Valentin Weigel, Lutheran mystic Jakob Böhme (1575–1624) founded theosophy and Behmenism, writing The Way to Christ (1624). A key concept for Böhme is the Ungrund, the un-grounded, primeval abyss prior to the creation of the world, which is also a will and pure freedom.[91] Hegel called Böhme "the first German philosopher."[92][e]

Cartesianism

[edit]

Piscator's grandson Tobias Andreae (1604–1676), Johannes Clauberg (1622–1665), Johann Eberhard Schweling (1645–1714), and Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus (1651–1708) defended Cartesianism, the views of French "father of modern philosophy" René Descartes (1596–1650).[94][95] Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia (1618–1680) posed the interaction problem for substance dualism to Descartes.[96]

Leibniz

[edit]
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was a rationalist.

Lutheran philosopher and mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) wrote primarily in Latin and French, such as the Discourse on Metaphysics (1686) and Nouveaux Essais (1689). Leibniz, along with Descartes and Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677), was one of the three great advocates of rationalism, the epistemological view that "regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge,"[97][98] rather than empirical evidence. Leibniz believed necessary truths were based on the law of non-contradiction, and contingent truths on the principle of sufficient reason, advancing the cosmological argument for God's existence.[99] He anticipated modern analytic philosophy by wishing for a universal language and logical calculus,[100] but his philosophy also looks back to scholasticism.[101]

Leibniz expounded an idealist theory of monads in works like Monadologie (1714). Monads are the ultimate elements composing the universe, comparable to the corpuscles of Cartesian mechanical philosophy; except Cartesian objects are merely extended in space, while Leibniz agreed with the scholastics that objects have substantial forms and entelechy.[102][103][104] Monads are centers of force; while space, matter, and motion are merely phenomenal or relational.[102][105] Monads additionally have the following properties: they are simple (having no parts) substances, eternal, individual, subject to their own laws, un-interacting ("windowless"), and only seem to interact causally due to God's pre-established harmony (a historically important example of panpsychism).[102]

Leibniz was an optimist – his Théodicée (1710) tries to resolve the problem of evil by claiming this is the best of all possible worlds,[106] because it was created by an all powerful and all knowing God, who would not choose to create an imperfect world if a better world was possible.[106] Leibniz also contributed to library science, at the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbüttel.[107]

Statues of Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in the courtyard of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, collage

The Enlightenment was heavily influenced by British natural philosopher Sir Isaac Newton (1643–1727) and Newtonianism. Influenced by Kepler, Newton published Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1686) and his laws of motion, introducing classical mechanics to physics.[108] Leibniz and Newton disputed who had invented calculus,[109] and the nature of space.[105]

Occasionalism

[edit]

Occasionalists think only God causes events. The German occasionalists were Leibniz teacher Erhard Weigel (1625–1699), and Descartes and Leibniz critic Johann Sturm (1635–1703).[110]

Erhard Weigel taught Samuel von Pufendorf (1632–1694). Pufendorf supported religious tolerance following the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), and authored On the Duty of Man and Citizen (1673).[111]

18th century

[edit]

Enlightenment

[edit]

The start of the German Enlightenment (Aufklärung) is commonly traced to Pufendorf's follower Christian Thomasius (1655–1728) lecturing in German.[112] The nearby Swiss Enlightenment included physiognomist Johann Kaspar Lavater (1741–1801), his friend Johann Konrad Pfenninger (1747–1792), and Berlin Academy of Sciences member Johann Georg Sulzer (1720–1779).

Wolff

[edit]
Christian Wolff followed Leibniz's philosophy.

The most eminent German philosopher between Leibniz and Kant was Christian Wolff (1679–1754), often grouped together with Leibniz as “Leibnizian-Wolffian philosophy”.[113] Wolff's rationalism was criticized by Pietists at the University of Halle like Philipp Spener (1635–1705) and August Hermann Francke (1663–1727).[113]

Wolff studied almost every scholarly subject of his time, displayed according to his logical method; his oeuvre arguably represents the peak of German Enlightenment rationality.[113] Wolff pioneered German language scholarship, replacing Latin terminology with German, but he also wrote in Latin for an international audience.[114][115] Wolff studied what he called both theoretical and practical philosophy, including economics and public administration.[115]

Wolff and Tübingen logician Gottfried Ploucquet (1716–1790), were originally occasionalists, but eventually abandoned the view.[110] Georg Bernhard Bilfinger (1693–1750) and Israel Gottlieb Canz (1690–1753) also followed Wolff at Tübingen.[116] Ploucquet taught August Friedrich Bök (1739–1815).[117]

Wolff influenced Sulzer and German Enlightenment scientist Tobias Mayer (1723–1762).[118][119] Alsatian polymath Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777) further developed Leibniz's universal language, Ploucquet's logic, and Mayer's science in Neues Organon (1764).[120] After Mayer's death, Abraham Gotthelf Kästner (1719–1800) directed the Observatory at the University of Göttingen,[121] teaching philosopher and physicist Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (1742–1799).[122] Wolff disciple Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830) founded the Illuminati.[123]

Art theorists Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten (1714–1762) and Georg Friedrich Meier (1718–1777) were students of Wolff. Baumgarten coined the term aesthetics, and Meier taught Aufklärer Thomas Abbt (1738–1766).[124]

Mendelssohn

[edit]
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing advocated the Enlightenment.

Moses Mendelssohn (1729–1786) of the Jewish Enlightenment (Haskalah) wrote Phaedon (1767), a defense of immortality, after Abbt's death. One scholar describes Mendelssohn as “the last great representative of the Leibniz-Wolffian school”.[125][126][f] Mendelssohn influenced Salomon Maimon (1753–1800).[127]

Lessing

[edit]

Abbt admired Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1729–1781), who embraced the Enlightenment and religious tolerance, for instance in his play Nathan the Wise (1779), a tribute to Mendelssohn.[128] Lessing said an "ugly, broad ditch" existed between the "accidental truths of history" and "the necessary truths of reason".[129]

Lessing published rationalist deist Hermann Samuel Reimarus (1694–1768) anonymously as the Wolfenbüttel Fragmente.[130] Lessing and Mendelssohn's friend Christoph Friedrich Nicolai (1733–1811) influenced Leibnizian-Wolffian popular philosopher Johann August Eberhard (1739–1809).[131][132] As well as Lambert and Eberhard, Johannes Nikolaus Tetens (1736–1807), known as the "German Locke", emphasized the phenomenal.[133][134][135] Tetens was influenced by Scottish common sense realism.[136]

Kant

[edit]
Immanuel Kant proposed transcendental idealism.

Königsberg University professor Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) studied under Wolffian Martin Knutzen (1713–1751).[137] Kant published his elaborate transcendental idealism in the Critique of Pure Reason (1781). Ever since, Kant has been considered one of the greatest influences in all of western philosophy. Kant saw himself as engaged in a "Copernican Revolution", shifting one's outlook into the mind rather than out to the world.[138] He was regarded as the "destroyer" of (scholastic) metaphysics, since called the "all-destroying Kant" by Mendelssohn.[139]

Kant distinguished between analytic truths stipulated by definition, and synthetic truths about the world; as well as between knowledge obtained prior to experience or a priori, and after experience, or a posteriori.[138]

Kant attempted to determine what can be known about the world, through the use of reason independent of all experience, which Kant called the synthetic a priori. Briefly, he concluded knowledge is had through experience, but what can be known is limited by how the mind can think: if we can only comprehend things in terms of, for example, cause and effect, then we can only know causes and effects. It follows one can know the form of all possible experience in the apparent, phenomenal world; but one can never know the noumenal world as it really is, the "thing-in-itself" absent a standpoint, and therefore one can never know the world in its entirety.[140]

Kant was a Pietist seeking the limits of knowledge “in order to make room for faith”. Kant also published the Prolegomena (1783), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), Critique of Practical Reason (1788), Critique of Judgment (1790), and The Metaphysics of Morals (1797). The Critique of Practical Reason is the best known work containing Kant's deontological ethics, with the categorical imperative; and a moral argument for God, free will, and the immortality of the soul.[141] The Critique of Judgment contains Kant's aesthetics, including his views on the beautiful and the sublime. Kant considered disinterest a key part of the judgement of taste.[142]

1755 copper engraving showing Lisbon in flames and a tsunami overwhelming the ships in the harbor

Knutzen introduced Kant to Newtonianism.[137] Kant was a champion of the Enlightenment who wrote Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose (1784) and adopted the phrase Sapere aude (Dare to know) in his essay "Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?" (1784).

Kant published three separate texts on the 1755 Lisbon earthquake,[143][144][145][146] theorizing its cause was shifts in large caverns filled with hot gases. While inaccurate, this early attempt to naturally explain earthquakes represents probably "the beginnings of scientific geography in Germany. And certainly the beginnings of seismology".[147] Kant also wrote on anthropology in Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798).

Early critics of Kant's "thing-in-itself" include Eberhard, Friedrich Bouterwek (1766–1828), and rational realist Christoph Gottfried Bardili (1761–1808).[148]

19th century

[edit]

German idealism

[edit]

Growing out of Kant's work, German idealism was a late 18th and 19th century movement, linked to both the Enlightenment's revolutionary politics, and to German Romanticism, which was associated with the Counter-Enlightenment.[149][150] Besides Kant, the prominent German idealists were Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814), Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (1770–1831), and most notably Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831).[149][151]

The French Revolution occurred in 1789.[152] The 19th century in Germany saw the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), revolutions of 1830 and 1848, and Unification of Germany and German Empire (proclaimed January 18, 1871) led by Otto von Bismarck following the Franco-Prussian War (1870).[153]

Hamann and Herder

[edit]

Johann Georg Hamann (1730–1788) and Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803) influenced both Romanticism and the proto-Romantic Sturm und Drang movement.[154][150]

Hamann wrote Socratic Memorabilia (1759), comparing Socratic ignorance with religious faith. His most notable contributions were to philosophy of language. He stated "Reason is language".[155]

Kant read Hamann's translation of Scottish skeptic philosopher David Hume (1711–1776), whose criticism of causation in Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1739) Kant credited for awakening him from his "dogmatic slumber".[156] Maimon attempted an intermediate position between Hume and Kant.[127] Hamann also introduced Kant to the work of French philosophe Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose portrait hung in Kant's home, and whom Kant called "Newton of the moral world".[157][158]

Hamann's student Herder won a Berlin Academy prize essay contest and subsequently published Treatise on the Origin of Language (1772).[159][160] Herder was one of the first to argue language shapes thought,[150] and his vitalism also revived philosophy of mind.[161][g]

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe practiced natural philosophy.

Herder influenced Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767–1835), who similarly saw language as creative rather than merely representative;[163][164] and is a namesake of the Humboldt University of Berlin, along with his brother, polymath Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859).[165][166] Herder also influenced Franz Bopp (1791–1876) and the Brothers Grimm, Jakob (1785–1863) and Wilhelm (1786–1859).[167]

Goethe

[edit]

An early participant in Sturm und Drang and Weimar Classicism was Institut namesake and polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), widely regarded as the most influential German writer for such works as the play Faust (1808) and novels Wilhelm Meister (1796) and Werther (1774).[168] Goethe's comments and observations also form the basis of several biographical works, most notably Johann Peter Eckermann's Conversations with Goethe (1836).[169]

Goethe was additionally a natural philosopher[170][171][172] who criticized Linnaean taxonomy and published his own work on morphology, the Metamorphosis of Plants (1790). Goethe advocated the law of compensation, "in order to spend on one side, nature is forced to economize on the other side."[173] He also published the Theory of Colours (1810), opposing Newton's theory found in Opticks.[174]

Goethe's friend Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) taught at the University of Jena (now Friedrich Schiller University Jena).[175] Schiller's teacher was Jacob Friedrich von Abel (1751–1829) of Tübingen.[176]

Romanticism

[edit]
Friedrich Schlegel was a romanticist.

The Early Romantics centered in Jena included brothers Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel (1772–1829) and August Wilhelm Schlegel (1767–1845), poets Friedrich Hölderlin (1770–1843), Novalis (1772–1801), and Ludwig Tieck (1773–1853), theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834), and platonic realist August Ludwig Hülsen (1765–1809).[177][178][179]

Schlegel brothers
[edit]

Friedrich Schlegel coined the term historicism,[180] claiming neoclassicist art historian Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717–1768) marked the beginning of a new era in philosophy, recognizing the unique character of antiquity.[181] The Schlegel brothers founded the journal Athenaeum and influenced conservative Adam Müller (1779–1829).[182]

Romantic poets
[edit]

Hölderlin was a Hellenophile influenced by Goethe, who attended the Tübinger Stift with Schelling and Hegel, and wrote the novel Hyperion (1799).[183] Novalis was a magical idealist.[184] Ludwig Tieck published tragic author Heinrich von Kleist (1777–1811).[185]

Schleiermacher
[edit]

Schleiemacher argued the true essence of religion lies not in the active love of one’s neighbor, but in passive contemplation of the infinite. Schleiermacher wondered whether hermeneutics, interpreting religious and other texts, was a collection of ad hoc pieces of advice for the solution of specific problems, or if there was a "general hermeneutics" going beyond exegesis, dealing with the "art of understanding" as such, wherever it occurs.[186][187]

Schleiermacher also contributed to the history of philosophy as "the pioneer of Heraclitus studies" and by challenging the notion of Plato's unwritten doctrines then popular at Tübingen. Schleiermacher taught polymath Hermann Grassmann (1809–1877).[188]

Fichte

[edit]
Johann Gottlieb Fichte was a subjective idealist.

Fichte was a subjective idealist rejecting even the "thing-in-itself" in works like Foundations of the Science of Knowledge (1795) and The Vocation of Man (1799). Fichte states the starting point of his philosophy is the absolute, self-aware, thinking "I", which itself creates the world with all its laws.[189][190][191] The University of Jena expelled Fichte on the charge of atheism, leading to the atheism dispute.[189]

Fichte was of pivotal importance for the Romantics. Friedrich Schlegel identified the "three sources of Romanticism": the French Revolution, Fichte's philosophy, and Wilhelm Meister.[192]

Romanticism saw the birth of nationalism and Volkstum, inspired by the likes of Rousseau, Herder, and opposition to French emperor Napoleon and the Wars of Liberation.[193] Fichte is regarded as a founder of modern German nationalism[194] when he expressed the unity of language and nation in his Addresses to the German Nation (1808):

Those who speak the same language are joined to each other by a multitude of invisible bonds by nature herself, long before any human art begins; they understand each other and have the power of continuing to make themselves understood more and more clearly; they belong together and are by nature one and an inseparable whole. ...Only when each people, left to itself, develops and forms itself in accordance with its own peculiar quality, and only when in every people each individual develops himself in accordance with that common quality, as well as in accordance with his own peculiar quality—then, and then only, does the manifestation of divinity appear in its true mirror as it ought to be.[195]

Fichte also influenced On War (1832) author Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831).[196] Following the French July Revolution (1830) and German Hambach Festival (1832), Heinrich Heine (1797–1856) criticized romanticism and hoped to inspire revolution, writing On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany (1834), an attack on Madame de Staël's book On Germany (1813).[197][198] The period preceding the 1848 revolutions, the Vormärz and Biedermeier era, saw the end of the Romantic era.[199]

Schelling

[edit]
Friedrich Schelling practiced Naturphilosophie.

Schelling initially adhered to Fichte, and associated with the Schlegel brothers, but subsequently created his own philosophy, called by one writer "the first manifestation of irrationalism".[200] Schelling averred "it is a poor objection to a philosopher that he is unintelligible."[201]

Influenced by Böhme and Kant, Schelling advanced organicism and Naturphilosophie, which sees nature as an expression of spiritual powers, expressed in the System of Transcendental Idealism (1800).[202] Schelling believed the absolute, or spiritual basis of nature, develops and eventually dissolves distinctions and contradictions, inaugurating idealist dialectics and Schelling's monist "philosophy of identity." The absolute is immersed in the same passive, motionless state as Schleiermacher's God.[203]

In his early or negative philosophy, such as the posthumously published The Philosophy of Art (1859), Schelling assigns a special role to art, in which freedom and the reality of "higher being" is fully comprehended, as contrasted with nature.[204] The artist is a kind of mystical creature who creates the world with "revelation", both conscious and unconscious intuition, or "inner contemplation."[205][206][h] In later life, Schelling evolves towards a mythological and mysticist "philosophy of revelation".[206]

G. W. F. Hegel was an absolute idealist.

Schelling influenced Karl Christian Friedrich Krause (1781–1832), who founded Krausism, another "philosophy of identity". Krausism was panentheism, and influential in Restoration Spain.[208]

Hegel

[edit]

Hegel, a protégé of von Abel and influenced by Böhme,[209] built a system of absolute idealism. Hegel thought the world was always in motion and contradictory;[i] a dialectic typically presented as a three-stage process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis.[211]

The absolute is expressed in self-knowledge, which increasingly presents itself in history. Hegel traces its development in three main stages in The Phenomenology of Spirit (1807). The first stage of the absolute is logical concepts, set forth in The Science of Logic (1812–1816).[212] The second stage is nature, expounded in the "Philosophy of Nature" entry from the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1817).[213] The highest, third stage is spirit, presented in art, religion, and philosophy, as revealed in "Philosophy of Spirit" from the Encyclopedia, and his University of Berlin lectures, covering material not found in his published writings.[214][j]

The Lectures on the Philosophy of History and Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1821) contain Hegel's political philosophy.[215]

Jacobi

[edit]
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi opposed nihilism.

Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743–1819) debated the pantheism controversy with Mendelssohn, a result of Lessing privately avowing Spinozism.[216] After Fichte was accused of atheism, Jacobi further explicated his view that the Enlightenment and philosophy led to nihilism, popularizing the concept. Jacobi advocated fideism (faith and revelation) instead of speculative reason. Pietist Thomas Wizenmann (1759–1787) was a disciple.[217]

Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) was influenced by Jacobi and is widely considered to be the first existentialist philosopher.[218][219][220] Kierkegaard believed religion required a leap of faith (salto mortale). According to one writer, Kierkegaard's views on philosophy and aesthetics were also an offshoot of Romanticism.[221]

Reinhold

[edit]

Karl Leonhard Reinhold (1757–1823) was one of the best known popularizers of Kant with Letters on the Kantian Philosophy (1787).[222] Reinhold advanced "elementary philosophy" which held the first principle of philosophy is "the principle of consciousness" that there is a subject, object, and a relation between them.[223]

Karl Leonhard Reinhold, popularizer of Kant.

Reinhold influenced Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg (1802–1872), who as well as German idealism defended Aristotelian philosophy and teleology.[224] His student, ethical activist Rudolf Christoph Eucken (1846–1926), won the 1908 Nobel Prize in Literature.[225][226]

Hegelianism

[edit]

Hegel was highly influential throughout the nineteenth century. Two distinct groups of Hegelians can be roughly divided into the more conservative 'right', or 'old', Hegelians, and the politically and religiously radical 'left', or 'young', Hegelians. The groups were not as unified or self-conscious as the labels 'right' and 'left' make them appear. The term was first used by David Strauss (1808–1874) to describe Bruno Bauer (1809–1882)—who actually was a typically 'Left', or Young, Hegelian.[227] Schelling was invited by Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm IV to a University of Berlin professorship to combat the Young Hegelians.[206]

Right Hegelians

[edit]

The Right Hegelians were Hegel's successors at the University of Heidelberg and University of Berlin. They included Karl Daub, Hermann Friedrich Wilhelm Hinrichs, Leopold von Henning, and Heinrich Gustav Hotho. Karl Daub (1765–1836), in his book Judas Ischariot (1816), writes Judas Iscariot was "an incarnation of the devil".[228] Heinrich Gustav Hotho (1802–1873) compiled Hegel's posthumously published Lectures on Aesthetics (1835).[229]

Hermann Lotze was a teleological idealist.

The Right Hegelians believed the dialectic of history had come to an end—Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit reveals itself to be the culmination of history.[230] Hegel's thought that reason and freedom had reached their zenith in the existing Prussian state was viewed as a paradox, at best; the Prussian regime provided extensive civil and social services, good universities, high employment, and some industrialization, but it was considered rather backward compared with the more liberal constitutional monarchies of France and Britain.[230]

Speculative theism
[edit]

Speculative theism was an 1830s movement closely related to, but distinguished from, Right Hegelianism.[231] Its proponents Immanuel Hermann Fichte (1796–1879), Christian Hermann Weisse (1801–1866), and Hermann Ulrici (1806–1884) were united in their demand to recover the "personal God" after panrationalist Hegelianism.[232][233]

Weisse and panpsychist Gustav Fechner (1801–1887) taught anti-psychologism advocate and logician Hermann Lotze (1817–1881).[234] Lotze criticized vitalism, proposing teleological idealism and the principle of teleomechanism, that mechanism is compatible with teleology.[224] Lotze influenced personalists, theologian Albrecht Ritschl (1822–1889), and perspectivist Gustav Teichmuller (1832–1888).[235]

Young Hegelians

[edit]

The Young Hegelians included Strauss, Bauer, Ludwig Feuerbach (1804–1872), and Max Stirner (1806–1856). They rejected utopian aspects of Hegelianism that "Old Hegelians" had interpreted to mean the world had already essentially reached perfection.[236]

They drew on Hegel's idea that the purpose and promise of history was the rejection of everything restricting freedom and reason; and they proceeded to mount radical critiques, first of religion and then of the Prussian political system. They felt Hegel's belief in the end of history conflicted with other aspects of his thought. They also felt the dialectic was certainly not complete, given the irrationality of religious beliefs and the apparent lack of political and religious freedom in Prussian society.[236]

Strauss was a pioneer in the historical investigation of Jesus and connected to the Tübingen School historical-critical method,[237] led by Ferdinand Christian Baur (1792–1860), who taught Jakob Friedrich Reiff (1810–1879), teacher of Edmund Pfleiderer (1842–1902), brother of Otto Pfleiderer (1839–1908).[238]

Bauer was a critic of both Judaism and Christianity and a central figure in the intellectual circles of the Vormärz.[239] Feuerbach wrote The Essence of Christianity (1841), arguing God is anthropomorphizing.[240] Feuerbach influenced positivist Friedrich Jodl (1849–1914).[241] Stirner was an anarchist.[242]

Materialism
[edit]

Many post-1848 intellectuals abandoned metaphysics.[243] The materialism controversy challenged conventions in the 1850s. Zoologist Carl Vogt (1817–1895) argued mental processes were entirely physical, stating "thoughts stand in the same relation to the brain as bile does to the liver or urine to the kidneys."[244] Vogt was supported by Ludwig Büchner (1824–1899) and opposed by Rudolf Wagner (1805–1864) and Justus von Liebig (1803–1873).[245]

Marx and Engels

[edit]

Young Hegelian Karl Marx (1818–1883) was also influenced by British economics, French socialism, French sociologist August Comte (1798–1857), and Zionist Moses Hess (1812–1875), founding Marxism, which most notably influenced the Bolsheviks in the 20th-century Russian Revolution and Soviet Union.[246] Marx wrote Das Kapital, a critical examination of capitalism.[247][248]

Marx's friend and associate Friedrich Engels (1820–1895), also a Young Hegelian, collaborated with Marx to write the Communist Manifesto (1848). Marx and Engels developed the criticism of private property, theory of class struggle and scientific socialism (communism), and dialectical and historical materialism rather than German idealism. As they wrote in the posthumously published The German Ideology (1932), "In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from heaven to Earth, here we ascend from Earth to heaven."[249] As Marx similarly said in an afterward in Das Kapital, Hegel "is standing on its head. It must be turned right side up again".[250]

Engels' philosophical works include Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (1888), which explains how Hegel and Feuerbach led to Marx. There was also The Holy Family (together with Marx, 1844) criticizing the Young Hegelians,[251] Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880) studying the utopian socialists and their differences with scientific socialism,[252][253] Dialectics of Nature (1883) applying Marxism to science,[254] and The Origin of the Family (1884) arguing that the family is an ever-changing institution shaped by capitalism.

Dühring

[edit]
Revolutionaries cheering, 1848

Engels dedicated his entire book Anti-Dühring (1878) to criticizing Dühring's views.[194] Eugen Dühring (1833–1921) was a German socialist, professor of mechanics, philosopher and economist. In philosophy he was an eclectic who combined positivism, mechanistic materialism and idealism into a "philosophy of the actual". Dühring’s views found support among some Social Democrats, most notably revisionist Eduard Bernstein (1850–1932).[255]

Dietzgen

[edit]

Joseph Dietzgen (1828–1888) independently came to conclusions very close to those of Marx and Engels.[256][k] After the revolution of 1848 he emigrated to America, and then went to Russia in 1864. Working in a tannery in St. Petersburg, Dietzgen devoted all his leisure time to philosophy, political economy and socialism. He wrote a large philosophical treatise, The Essence of the Mental Labor of Man (1869), a review of the first volume of Das Kapital. Dietzgen then returned to Germany, and again moved to America, where he wrote Excursions of a Socialist in the Field of the Theory of Knowledge (1887) and Acquisition of Philosophy (1895).[256]

Academic socialism

[edit]

Kathedersozialismus (armchair socialism) or academic socialism was a German university trend in the second half of the 19th century, with views similar to those of the British Fabian socialists.[257][258] Academic socialism supported a version of Bismarck’s welfare state,[259] seeking to prove socialism could be built in Prussian Germany through reform, without the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the state, thus rejecting the Marxist notion of class struggle. In 1872 they formed the "Union of Social Policy".[260]

The most notable academic socialist in Germany was social democrat Ferdinand Lassalle (1825–1864).[194] Most of its adherents were economists and sociologists belonging to the “Historical School”, such as anti-Marxist and "older" leader Bruno Hildebrand (1812–1878), "younger" leader Gustav von Schmoller (1838–1917), Adolph Wagner (1835–1917), Lujo Brentano (1844–1931), Hans Delbrück (1848–1929), Ferdinand Toennies (1855–1936), and Werner Sombart (1863–1941).[194]

Schopenhauer

[edit]
Arthur Schopenhauer, a pessimist philosopher

Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) was an opponent of Hegel influenced by Eastern and Hindu philosophy, introduced to Germany with Friedrich Schlegel's On the language and wisdom of the Indians (1808).[261][262][263] Schopenhauer's teacher was Gottlob Ernst Schulze (1761–1833), who wrote Aenesidemus (1792), a skeptical polemic against Kant and Reinhold.[264] Leibniz also influenced Schopenhauer, whose dissertation was On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (1813).

Schopenhauer followed Kant but concluded introspection was a way to access the thing-in-itself. Schopenhauer's most influential work, The World as Will and Representation (1818), claimed at the heart of the world and man lies the “will to life.” Schopenhauer is seen as foreshadowing the work of psychologist Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) and the unconscious mind.[265]

Schopenhauer was a pessimist whose analysis of will led him to believe that desires can never be fulfilled. Consequently, he eloquently described a lifestyle of abandoning desires, similar to the asceticism of Buddhist Nirvana, Vedanta, and the Desert Fathers of early Christianity.[266] Schopenhauer also thought art could alleviate suffering.[267]

Post-Schopenhauerian pessimism became a popular trend,[268] but viewed with disdain by other contemporary popular philosophies; the typical pessimist was seen as detriment to society opposed to revolution and science. Philosophers responding to this growing criticism included Julius Bahnsen (1830–1881), Karl Robert Eduard von Hartmann (1842–1906), and Philipp Mainländer (1841–1876).[l]

Mainländer

[edit]
Ernst Haeckel

Philipp Mainländer similarly sees the will as the first principle. However, with Schopenhauer, the will is singular, unified, and beyond time and space, while Mainländer instead believed in pluralism.[271] Mainländer also believed in salvation for all of creation. With Schopenhauer, the silencing of the will is a rare event. The artistic genius can achieve this temporarily, but only a few saints have sustained it. For Mainländer, the whole cosmos is slowly but surely moving towards silencing the will-to-live and "redemption".[272] The appendix to Mainländer's The Philosophy of Redemption contains the "Critique of the Doctrines of Kant and Schopenhauer".[273][m]

Haeckel

[edit]

Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) introduced to Germany Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, as found in On the Origin of Species (1859).[275] Haeckel propounded recapitulation theory, or "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny", and was also a monist.[276] Haeckel was opposed by neo-vitalist Hans Driesch (1867–1941).[277]

Neo-Kantianism

[edit]
Eduard Zeller was a Neo-Kantian.

Neo-Kantianism was a late 19th-century revival of Kant's philosophy, influenced especially by Schopenhauer's criticism, as well as by other philosophers such as Jakob Friedrich Fries (1773–1843) and Johann Friedrich Herbart (1776–1841). Otto Liebmann (1840–1912) urged going "back to Kant".[278]

The neo-Kantians preferred scientific readings of Kant and emphasized understanding over sensibility; and made early use of such philosophical terminology as "epistemology", upholding its prominence over ontology.[279] Eduard Zeller (1814–1908) combined Neo-Kantianism with the methods of the Tübingen School.[280] The Neo-Kantians influenced socialists such as Eduard Bernstein[281] and the Austromarxists.[282]

Marburg school

[edit]

Friedrich Albert Lange (1828–1875) influenced Hermann Cohen (1842–1918), who led the Marburg School, which emphasized epistemology and philosophical logic, and included Paul Natorp (1854–1924), symbolism theorist Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945), and Nicolai Hartmann (1882–1950).[283] Cohen's friend was existentialist Franz Rosenzweig (1886–1929).[284]

Southwest school

[edit]
Wilhelm Windelband was a Southwest school Neo-Kantian.

The Southwest School (or Heidelberg School or Baden School) emphasized culture and value theory (notably the fact–value distinction), and included Lotze student Wilhelm Windelband (1848–1915), critical realist Alois Riehl (1844–1924), Heinrich Rickert (1863–1936), Ernst Troeltsch (1865–1923), and Emil Lask (1875–1915).[285] Windelband influenced sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920), author of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905).[286] Max's brother Alfred Weber (1868–1958) taught Karl Mannheim (1893–1947).[287]

Neo-Friesian school

[edit]

A third group, mainly represented by Leonard Nelson (1882–1927), was the Göttingen-based neo-Friesian School, which emphasized philosophy of science.[288]

Psychologism dispute

[edit]

The end of the 19th century saw the psychologism dispute.[289] Psychologism was defended by Neo-Kantian Theodor Lipps (1851–1914), Dutch panpsychist Gerardus Heymans (1857–1930), psychologists Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), Theodor Elsenhans (1862–1918), and Benno Erdmann (1862–1918), pragmatist Wilhelm Jerusalem (1854–1923), and logician Christoph von Sigwart (1830–1904).[290] Wundt taught Felix Krueger (1874–1948) and Oswald Külpe (1862–1915).[291] Natorp and Riehl opposed psychologism.[292]

Nietzsche

[edit]
Friedrich Nietzsche backed the will to power

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) was an influential existentialist philosopher and philologist, and initially a proponent of Schopenhauer. Nietzsche was also an irrationalist and perspectivist influenced by Romanticism and Teichmuller.[n]

Nietzsche soon replaced Schopenhauer's will to life with the will to power.[294] He disavowed Schopenhauer's pessimism, and sought to provide a life-affirming, positive philosophy in works like Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1885) and The Gay Science (1882), a title from Friedrich Schlegel's novel Lucinde (1799).[295][296] Nietzsche believed this task was urgent, since modernity and Christianity caused nihilism to spread across Europe, summed up in the phrase "God is dead".[297] Nietzsche's proposed solution was the Übermensch and Eternal Recurrence.[298]

Nietzsche next wrote the aphoristic Beyond Good and Evil (1886). In On the Genealogy of Morals (1887), Nietzsche gives a genealogical critique of Christian morality and related theory of master–slave morality. He continues the polemic against Christianity in The Antichrist (1895).[299]

Dilthey

[edit]

Trendelenburg student Wilhelm Dilthey (1833–1911) along with Nietzsche, Georg Simmel (1858–1918), and Ludwig Klages (1872–1956), founded the intuitionist and irrationalist school of German Lebensphilosophie.[300]

Dilthey continued Schleiermacher's project of a hermeneutics which was a "general methodology of the humanities and social sciences".[301] Dilthey was a historist who initiated a Romantic renaissance with his Schleiermacher biography and works on Novalis and Hölderlin.[302] His vitalistic interpretations of Hegel and Goethe were influential; the latter led from Simmel and Friedrich Gundolf (1880–1931) to Klages,[303] who coined the term logocentrism.[304] Dilthey and Simmel influenced Austrian-Israeli existentialist Martin Buber (1878–1965), author of I and Thou (1923).[305] Dilthey also influenced Hermann von Keyserling (1880–1946).[306]

Mach

[edit]
Ernst Mach believed in the "economy of thought"

Austrian physicist Ernst Mach (1838–1916) in works such as Analysis of Sensations (1885) and Cognition and Delusion (1905) propounded neutral monism, affirming everything was physical, yet equally considering everything to be “complexes of sensations,” rejecting an external world independent of consciousness.[307]

Mach and teacher Gustav Kirchoff (1824–1887) believed in the "economy of thought," to eliminate all superfluous metaphysical elements. Following Leibniz, Mach was a relationist about space.[308] Mach's rival was Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906), notable for the Boltzmann brain thought experiment.[309]

Fritz Mauthner (1849–1923) was Mach's student. Mach's views were widespread among physicists, including theory of relativity pioneer Albert Einstein, electromagnetism pioneer Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894), and Philipp Frank (1884–1966).[194]

Mach's views also found support among Marxists such as Friedrich Adler (1879–1960) and Otto Bauer (1881–1938), and in Russia among a part of the Bolshevik intelligentsia.[o]

Richard Avenarius (1843–1896) founded empirio-criticism. Avenarius similarly denied a world independent of consciousness. According to Avenarius, consciousness and being, subject and object ("I" and "environment") are in constant, obligatory connection ("fundamental coordination").[310] Joseph Petzoldt (1862–1929) was a disciple.[310]

Communist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) dedicated his entire book Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (1909) to the criticism of Mach, Frank, and Avenarius, writing "this philosophy serves the clergy, serves the same purposes as the philosophy of Berkeley and Hume."[194]

Austrian realism

[edit]
Franz Brentano re-introduced intentionality.

A school of thought called Austrian realism formed in the former state of Austria-Hungary,[311] notable for influencing both analytic and continental philosophy.[312][p]

In Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (1874), Trendelenburg student and University of Vienna philosopher and psychologist Franz Brentano (1838–1917) re-introduced the scholastic concept of intentionality, or aboutness.[314] For Brentano, all mental events or acts of consciousness have a real, non-mental intentional object, which the thinking is directed at or "about".[315] Intentionality is "the mark of the mental."[315] Intentionality is to be distinguished from intention or intension.[316]

The School of Brentano included Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) and Alexius Meinong (1853–1920). Meinong defends his unique ontology of empty names referring to real, nonexistent objects. This view is known as Meinongianism, or pejoratively as Meinong's jungle. According to Meinong, objects like flying pigs or golden mountains have real being, even though they do not exist. Meinong founded the Graz School, which included Ernst Mally (1879–1944).[317]

Meinong's student Christian von Ehrenfels (1859–1932) is a founder of Gestalt psychology, also influenced by Goethe and Mach.[318] Carl Stumpf (1848–1936), a student of Brentano and Lotze, founded the Berlin School of experimental psychology, which included Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Köhler, and Kurt Koffka.[319]

Brentano also influenced the Polish Lwów–Warsaw school, founded by Kazimierz Twardowski (1866–1938), who emphasized "small philosophy", or the detailed, systematic analysis of specific problems.[320] Husserl, Meinong, and Twardowski were influenced by Bohemian Catholic and logical realist Bernard Bolzano (1781–1848).[321] Bolzano foreshadowed analytic philosophy with talk of propositions, but in Kantian language, "sentences-in-themselves".[321][322][q]

20th century

[edit]
Shortly before its fall, Germans stand atop the Berlin Wall, in front of the Brandenburg Gate.

Germans influenced both major schools of 20th-century philosophy: the analytic and continental traditions. Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) and Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) are considered two of the century's most influential philosophers.[r] So is Heidegger's predecessor Edmund Husserl; and "father of analytic philosophy" Gottlob Frege (1848–1925), who influenced Wittgenstein through his mentor, Briton Bertrand Russell.[s]

The 20th century also saw Imperial Germany's defeat in World War I (1914–1918) started by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Academic socialist Johann Plenge (1874–1963) wrote that World War I contrasted German socialism and organization against liberty and freedom.[328]

Next was the Weimar Republic (1918–1933), Hitler's rise to power and the defeat of Nazi Germany (1933–1945) in World War II (1939–1945), and the subsequent Cold War (1947–1991) dividing Germany into East and West, until the Fall of the Berlin Wall (November 9, 1989) and German reunification (October 3, 1990).[329][330]

Neo-Romanticism

[edit]

Adam Müller influenced Austrian neo-romantic universalist Othmar Spann (1878–1950), who taught Friedrich Hayek (1899–1992), critic of scientism and winner of the 1974 Nobel Prize in economics.[331]

Neo-Hegelianism

[edit]

Neo-Hegelianism (or Post-Hegelianism) was a trend including Richard Kroner, Siegfried Marck, Arthur Liebert, and Hermann Glöckner.[194] Richard Kroner (1884–1974) was a Jewish convert to Christianity who dubbed Hegel "the Protestant Aquinas".[332]

Spengler

[edit]
Oswald Spengler, the philosopher of decline.

German philosopher of history Oswald Spengler (1880–1936) was influenced by Goethe, Nietzsche, and Neo-Kantian scientific fictionalist Hans Vaihinger (1852–1933), author of The Philosophy of 'As if' (1911).[333] Spengler's main work is The Decline of the West (1918), published shortly after World War I. Spengler predicts the inevitable collapse of European civilization. In Man and Technics (1931), Spengler said "Optimism is cowardice."[334]

Spengler’s philosophy of history is based on analogy and denies causation, knowledge, and truth, preferring intuition and absolute relativism.[335] Spengler contrasts the scientific understanding of natural historical development with historical fatalism or “destiny.”[335]

Spengler rejects historical progress and linear, unified whig history. adopting a cyclical, organic theory of history.[336] Independent, unique “cultures,” special organisms, guided by a unique idea and destiny, experience periods of early age emergence, middle age flourishing and old age dying. According to Spengler, the philosopher of history comprehends the “morphological structure” of the "soul" of each “culture". He calls Western European culture Faustian, ruled by the idea of infinity, and says its decline started in the 19th century, with the victory of capitalism.[337] Spengler influenced Englishman Arnold Toynbee (1889–1975).[194]

Spengler was an elitist who praised the era of feudalism and the “Old Prussian spirit” of monarchy, nobility and militarism,[338] stating war is “an eternal form of higher human existence.”[339] He disliked democracy, declaring "the mass", the “fourth estate”,[t] “outside" of history and culture, a “radical nothing.”[338] Historicist Friedrich Meinecke (1862–1954) criticized Spengler.[340]

Spartacists

[edit]

As World War I ended, Marxist Spartacus League and Communist Party of Germany (KPD) leaders such as Rosa Luxemburg (1871–1919) and Karl Liebknecht (1871–1919) sparked the November Revolution, including the Spartacist uprising and abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II.[341] The Freikorps defeated the revolutionaries.[342]

Pan-Europeanism

[edit]

Austro-Japanese Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894–1972) supported American president Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points following World War I, and was one of the first to articulate Pan-Europeanism, outlined in his Pan-Europa manifesto (1923).[343] The First Paneuropean Congress took place in Vienna in 1926.

Nazi philosophy

[edit]

Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933 and led Nazi Germany, with its combination of anti-semitism, nationalism and socialism, arguably influenced by Spengler, who in Prussianism and Socialism (1919) advances “German socialism” against “Marxist socialism”.[344] The Nazi Party or National Socialist German Worker's Party was an outgrowth of the German Worker's Party founded shortly after World War I by Pan-German folkist Anton Drexler, poet Dietrich Eckart, economist Gottfried Feder, and Karl Harrer.[345]

Alfred Baeumler, best known academic philosopher in Nazi Germany.

The Nazis propounded the Stab-in-the-back myth and opposed 'the system' of the Weimar Republic, denouncing the November Revolution and German leaders who signed the Treaty of Versailles and Armistice of November 11, 1918 as "November criminals".[346]

The Nazi Party included philosophers Heidegger, who took the vow of allegiance, and Carl Schmitt (1888–1985), author of The Concept of the Political (1932).[347][348] Ernst Mally joined the National Socialist Teachers League soon after the Anschluss (1938).[349] Meinecke supported the invasion of Poland (1939).[350]

The best known work of Nazi philosophy was The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930) by head of the Militant League for German Culture Alfred Rosenberg (1893–1946). It said soul was race seen from within, and was awarded the State Prize for Art and Science for 1937.[351] Its title was an homage to Houston Stewart Chamberlain's The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century (1899).[352]

Nazi Germany's most prominent academic philosopher was Alfred Baeumler (1887–1968), director of the Institute for Political Pedagogy in Berlin, who advocated Nietzsche's philosophy.[353] There was also anti-Kantian Ernst Krieck (1882–1947).[354]

Positive Christianity was a religious movement in Nazi Germany claiming Christ was Aryan.[355] The pagan German Faith Movement was founded by Tübingen Indologist Jakob Wilhelm Hauer (1881–1962) and influenced by occultist Guido von List (1848–1919), founder of Wotanism and author of The Secret of the Runes (1908).[356]

By 1933, the various neo-Kantian circles in Germany had dispersed.[279] The Nazis expelled both the analytic Vienna Circle and the continental Frankfurt School, entrenching them in American philosophy. Emil Fackenheim (1916–2003) was interned at Sachsenhausen concentration camp.[357]

Analytic philosophy

[edit]
Gottlob Frege, founder of analytic philosophy.

Gottlob Frege

[edit]

Advances in logic from Britain were imported by Ernst Schröder (1841–1902).[358] The predicate logic of University of Jena professor Gottlob Frege found in Begriffschrift (1879) subsequently made the most substantial advance over Aristotelian logic.[u] Frege was also an influential opponent of idealism in the philosophy of language and philosophy of mathematics, beginning the "linguistic turn" and analytic philosophy, the dominant style in the Anglosphere.[361][v]

Frege supported Leibniz and opposed Kant in the philosophy of mathematics.[363] He advocated logicism, the project of reducing arithmetic to pure logic. In set theory Frege extended the work of German mathematicians Georg Cantor (1845–1918) and Richard Dedekind (1831–1916).[364]

Frege was also influenced by Lotze.[365] He argued for mathematical platonism and against psychologism in works like The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884).[366] In the philosophy of language, Frege advocated a mediated reference theory in his paper On Sense and Reference (1892), and for platonism about propositions in the article Thought (1918).[367]

Early Wittgenstein

[edit]
Ludwig Wittgenstein, author of the Tractatus

Ludwig Wittgenstein of the prominent Austrian-Jewish Wittgenstein family read solipsist and misogynist Otto Weininger (1880–1903) in his youth.[w] After studying with Russell, Wittgenstein served for the Austro-Hungarian Army in World War I, simultaneously developing a comprehensive system of logical atomism and picture theory of meaning. When Wittgenstein published Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (German: Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung, 1921), he thought he solved all the problems of philosophy.[369][370]

The Tractatus starts, "The world is all that is the case." Wittgenstein claims the universe is the totality of actual states of affairs, which can be expressed and mirrored by the language of predicate logic. Thus, a picture of the universe can be constructed by expressing facts in the form of atomic propositions and linking them using logical operators.[371][372]

The Tractatus introduced philosophers to the terms tautology, truth conditions, and to the truth table method. Wittgenstein believed tautologies or logical truths say nothing, but show the logical structure of the world,[373][374] and has been labeled a mystic who believed in the ineffable by some readers.[375] The Tractatus further ultimately concludes that all of its propositions are meaningless, illustrated with a ladder one must toss away after climbing up it.[376] The book ends, "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."[377]

The Vienna Circle

[edit]
Moritz Schlick
Otto Neurath
Hans Hahn
Rudolf Carnap
Members of the Vienna Circle

The Vienna Circle (originally the Ernst Mach society) formed to promote scientific thought and combat the influence of Hegelian system-building.[378] Wittgenstein influenced their philosophy, called logical positivism, which believed every meaningful statement is either an analytic truth or a verifiable, synthetic truth.[379] The Vienna Circle was led by Moritz Schlick, and included Rudolf Carnap (1891–1970), Philipp Frank, Hans Hahn (1879–1934), and Otto Neurath (1882–1945).[378][380]

Neurath, notable for Neurath's boat, was also a socialist, incarcerated when the Bavarian Soviet Republic was defeated after the November Revolution, penning Anti-Spengler (1921) in prison.[381]

The closely related Berlin Circle was led by Hans Reichenbach (1891–1953) and included Carl Hempel (1905–1997) and mathematician David Hilbert (1862–1943).[382][x] Hahn taught Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) whose incompleteness theorems (1931) showed Hilbert's program was impossible.[384]

Carnap and Reichenbach started the journal Erkenntnis.[385] Carnap advocated solving problems by "semantic ascent", talking about language instead of its objects. Carnap also distinguished between trivial internal questions and meaningless external questions.[386] He is best known for works like The Logical Structure of the World (1967) and The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language (1959).[387]

Moritz Schlick 1882–1936) was murdered by his former student Johann Nelböck.[388] Vienna Circle associate Karl Popper (1902–1994) was notable for falsification and The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945).[389]

Later Wittgenstein

[edit]

Wittgenstein then had a radical break with his early philosophy, as exemplified by the posthumously published Philosophical Investigations (1953).[390]

The later Wittgenstein develops a therapeutic approach, introducing the concept of a "language-game" as a "form of life". By "language-game", one means a language simpler than an entire language. Wittgenstein argued that a word or sentence has meaning only as a result of the "rule" of the "game" being played. Depending on the context, for example, the utterance "Water!" could be an order, the answer to a question, or some other form of communication. Rather than his prior picture theory of meaning, the later Wittgenstein advocates a theory of meaning as use, according to which words are defined by how they are used within the language-game.[391]

The duck-rabbit illusion became famous when Wittgenstein used it to distinguish "seeing that" from "seeing as".

The notion of family resemblance contends things apparently connected by one essential, common feature may in fact be connected by a series of overlapping similarities, where no one feature is common to all of them. Since Wittgenstein, games have been a classic example.[392]

Philosophical Investigations also contains the private language argument. Another argument Wittgenstein makes against private language involves the beetle-in-a-box thought experiment. He asks the reader to imagine several people have a box, inside of which is something everyone intends to refer to with the word beetle. Further, suppose that no one can look inside another's box. Under such a situation, Wittgenstein says the word beetle is meaningless.[393]

He also uses the duck-rabbit, an ambiguous image, to describe two aspects of seeing: "seeing that" versus "seeing as". Wittgenstein listed his influences as "Boltzmann, Hertz, Schopenhauer, Frege, Russell, Kraus, Loos, Weininger, Spengler, and Sraffa."[394]

Continental philosophy

[edit]

While some of the seminal philosophers of analytic philosophy wrote in German, 20th-century German philosophy tends to be classified as 'continental' philosophy – as befits Germany's position on the European 'continent' as opposed to the British Isles or Anglosphere.

Existentialism influenced continental philosophy. Heidegger is often identified as an existentialist, though he rejected this. Karl Jaspers (1883–1969) also rejected the label, despite being a student of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Jaspers' early philosophy believed in the authentic self or existenz, found in Philosophy of Existence (1938).[395] Heidegger and Jaspers student Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) was an influential political theorist.[396]

Phenomenology

[edit]

Phenomenology is philosophy which emphasizes phenomena as it is given to consciousness, attempting to avoid imposed explanations.[397] It began with the transcendental phenomenology of Edmund Husserl, and has had a large influence on continental philosophy, particularly existentialism and poststructuralism.[398]

Edmund Husserl
[edit]

Influenced by Brentano and Stumpf, Husserl taught at the University of Göttingen. Frege responded to Husserl's psychologism from Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891), and Husserl subsequently changed his mind, refuting psychologism in Logical Investigations (1901).[399] For Husserl, every mental act has noema or meaningful content.[400]

Husserl's other best known work is the Cartesian Meditations (1931). Husserl believes phenomenology seeks the eidos or essence, with redness as his preferred example.[401] Husserl advocates bracketing to focus on experience and achieve eidetic variation and reduction. Husserl introduced the concept of the lifeworld in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (1936).[402]

Husserl influenced students of Lipps, such as World War I casualty Adolf Reinach (1883–1917), founder of Munich phenomenology, which included Max Scheler (1874–1928).[403] He also influenced Alsatian Jean Héring (1890–1966), Polish aesthete Roman Ingarden (1893–1970), and philosophers of science like operationalist Hugo Dingler (1881–1954).[404][405]

Martin Heidegger
[edit]
Hans-Georg Gadamer developed hermeneutics.

Martin Heidegger's magnum opus Being and Time (1927) applied phenomenology to ontology and discussed the metaphysics of presence. Heidegger is notable for such concepts as "care" and Dasein, the consciousness particular to people of "being there", and the "facticity" of "thrownness", being thrown into the world. He argued aletheia (usually translated as "truth") is better understood as disclosure.[406]

Heidegger gave up "philosophy" in his later life, preferring the term "thinking".[407] In works like Introduction to Metaphysics (1953), Heidegger believed "the thinking of Heraclitus and Parmenides, which lies at the origin of philosophy, was falsified and misinterpreted" by Plato and Aristotle, tainting all subsequent Western philosophy.[408] His later philosophy was much concerned with technology, in works like The Question Concerning Technology (1954).[409]

With Martin Heidegger's Being and Time, hermeneutics took an 'ontological turn', dealing with the most fundamental questions of being.[410][411] Heidegger developed the concept of a hermeneutic circle in The Origin of the Work of Art (1950), further developed by his pupil Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900–2002), author of Truth and Method (1960).[412]

Frankfurt School

[edit]
Theodor Adorno

In 1923, Carl Grünberg founded the Institute for Social Research, drawing from neo-Hegelianism,[194] anti-Stalinist Marxism, Freud's psychoanalysis, and Max Weber, which came to be known as the "Frankfurt School", founders of critical theory and associated with writers such as Theodor W. Adorno (1903–1969), Arendt colleague Walter Benjamin (1892–1940), Ernst Bloch (1885–1977), Erich Fromm (1900–1980), Max Horkheimer (1895–1973), Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979), and Wilhelm Reich (1897–1957).[413]

The school reorganized in Frankfurt after World War II, critiquing the alleged problems of the Enlightenment and modernity in Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947) by Adorno and Horkheimer and Negative Dialectics (1966) by Adorno.[413]

In the 1960s and 1970s, Marcuse became the pre-eminent theorist of the New Left.[414] The Frankfurt School has since been guided by Jürgen Habermas' (1929–2026) work on communicative reason[415][416] and linguistic intersubjectivity. Habermas once debated philosopher of social science Niklas Luhmann (1927–1998).[417]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ↑ While Saint Ambrose (c. 339–397) was born in modern-day Germany, German philosophy starts much later.[4]
  2. ↑ At St. Emmeram's in Regensburg, Otloh of Sankt Emmeram (c. 1010–c. 1072) and Manegold of Lautenbach (c. 1030–c. 1103) were opponents of philosophy.[9] By the twelfth century, all the monks at St. Emmeram's were illiterate.[4][10] Otloh preferred the study of music.[11]
  3. ↑ She has also become recognized as one of the Middle Ages best musicians and composers, ever since Gothic Voices recorded A Feather on the Breath of God (1982).[20]
  4. ↑ His major work, Tractatus de modis significandi seu Grammatica speculativa, was often misattributed to Scotus, until 1922.
  5. ↑ Note this is considered highly idiosyncratic. "His attempt to show that they were unconsciously moving towards Hegelianism leads to a falsification of the processes of history. Philosophies which will not fit into that pattern are dismissed as "perversities" or, as in the case of Berkeley and Hume are very lightly touched upon; "philosophers" like Jakob Boehme, who suit Hegel's scheme, are discussed at disproportionate length."[93]
  6. ↑ His descendants include the composers Fanny and Felix Mendelssohn; Felix's son, chemist Paul Mendelssohn Bartholdy; Fanny's grandsons, Paul and Kurt Hensel; and the founders of the Mendelssohn & Co. banking house.
  7. ↑ Herder disputed the ruins of Persepolis with Göttingen professor Arnold Hermann Ludwig Heeren (1760–1842), arguing they were of Jamshid origin rather than Achaemenid.[162] Depictions of the ruins of Persepolis had been provided by explorers and travelers like Engelbert Kämpfer, Jean Chardin, Cornelis de Bruijn, and Carsten Niebuhr.
  8. ↑ "In his philosophy of art, Schelling emerged from the subjective boundaries in which Kant concluded aesthetics, referring it only to features of judgment. Schelling's aesthetics, understanding the world as an artistic creation, has adopted a universal character and served as the basis for the teachings of the Romantic school."[207]
  9. ↑ Graham Priest explains Hegel's account of motion as being both here and not here.[210]
  10. ↑ An enigmatic work published by Franz Rosenzweig is known as "The Oldest Systematic Program of German Idealism." It seems to be Schelling's work, but in Hegel's handwriting.
  11. ↑ While sometimes critical, Marx and Engels highly appreciated Dietzgen as a thinker. Marx wrote that Dietzgen expressed “many excellent thoughts, and as a product of the independent thinking of a worker, worthy of amazement.” Engels echoed Marx, “And it is remarkable that we were not alone in discovering this materialistic dialectic, which for many years now has been our best tool of labor and our sharpest weapon; the German worker Joseph Dietzgen rediscovered it independently of us and even independently of Hegel.”[194]
  12. ↑ Beiser reviews the commonly held position that Schopenhauer was a transcendental idealist and he rejects it: "Though it is deeply heretical from the standpoint of transcendental idealism, Schopenhauer's objective standpoint involves a form of transcendental realism, i.e. the assumption of the independent reality of the world of experience."[269][270]
  13. ↑ Mainländer committed suicide by hanging the day after the publication of his masterwork, believing it was the ultimate fulfillment of his own philosophy.[274]
  14. ↑ In the opinion of Marxist György Lukács, Nietzsche founded a modern irrationalism antithetical to that of the Romantics.[293]
  15. ↑ e. g. Alexander Bogdanov, Vladimir Bazarov, Anatoly Lunacharsky, Pavel Yushkevich, Nikolai Valentinov et al.
  16. ↑ Michael Dummett has remarked analytic philosophy is better characterized as Anglo-Austrian rather than the usual Anglo-American.[313]
  17. ↑ Dummett remarked that Bolzano is analytic philosophy's great-grandfather.[323]
  18. ↑ For example, according to a poll by the Philosophical Gourmet Report.[324]
  19. ↑ Russell wrote a book on Leibniz,[325][326] which was reviewed by Cassirer.[327]
  20. ↑ To be distinguished from the usual usage of "fourth estate" to mean the press and news media.
  21. ↑ Kant incorrectly claimed in the Critique of Pure Reason that "Since Aristotle . . . logic has not been able to advance a single step, and is thus to all appearance a closed and completed doctrine."[359][360]
  22. ↑ American philosopher John Searle called Frege the second greatest German philosopher, behind only Kant.[362]
  23. ↑ Weininger committed suicide in the house where Beethoven had died.[368]
  24. ↑ There was also the Dutch significs group led by Frederik van Eeden, which included intuitionist LEJ Brouwer.[383]

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Lowith, Karl. From Hegel to Nietzsche, 1991, p. 370–375.
  2. ↑ Pinkard, Terry P. German philosophy, 1760–1860: the legacy of idealism, 2002, ch. 13.
  3. ↑ Kenny, Anthony. Oxford Illustrated History of Western Philosophy, 2001, p. 220–224.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lewis White Beck. "German philosophy". Cambridge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  5. ↑ Wikisource One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Hrabanus Maurus Magnentius". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 842.
  6. ↑ The Cyclopædia of Education: a Dictionary of Information for the Use of Teachers, School Officers, Parents, and Others. (1883). United Kingdom: E. Steiger & Company. p. 719
  7. ↑ Scherer, W. (1886). A History of German Literature. United Kingdom: C. Scribner's Sons. p. 51
  8. ↑ Periods of European Literature. (1904). United States: C. Scribner's sons. p. 317
  9. ↑ Poirel, Dominique (2021). Anti-dialecticians in the Middle Ages: Historiographic Myth or Reality? In Julie Brumberg-Chaumont & Claude Rosental, Logical Skills: Social-Historical Perspectives. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 121-135.
  10. ↑ Constable, G. (1998). Three Studies in Medieval Religious and Social Thought: The Interpretation of Mary and Martha, the Ideal of the Imitation of Christ, the Orders of Society. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 313
  11. ↑ Von Simson, O. G., Simson, O. v. (1988). The Gothic Cathedral: Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order - Expanded Edition. United States: Princeton University Press. p.40-41
  12. ↑ Critchley, Simon (2024). On Mysticism: The Experience of Ecstasy (1st ed.). Profile Books. p. 71. ISBN 978-1800816930.
  13. ↑ Thomson, R. (2007). The place of Germany in the twelfth-century Renaissance. In Manuscripts and Monastic Culture: Reform and Renewal in Twelfth-Century Germany (pp. 19–42)
  14. ↑ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Hugh of St Victor" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 858.
  15. ↑ Lapina, E. (2015). Warfare and the Miraculous in the Chronicles of the First Crusade. United States: Penn State University Press.
  16. ↑ Shopkow, L. (1997). History and community : Norman historical writing in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Washington: Catholic University of America Press. p. 250
  17. ↑ Wikisource This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Holland, Arthur William (1911). "Otto of Freising". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 20 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 375–376.
  18. ↑ A Companion to the Abbey of Saint Victor in Paris. (2017). Germany: Brill. p. 301
  19. ↑ Handbook of Church History: From the High Middle Ages to the eve of the Reformation. (1970). United States: Herder and Herder. p. 48
  20. ↑ The Sounds and Sights of Performance in Early Music: Essays in Honour of Timothy J. McGee. (2017). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 256
  21. ↑ "The Pharos: "Review and Reflections"" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  22. ↑ Mercier, D., Parker, T. L. (1922). A Manual of Modern Scholastic Philosophy. United Kingdom: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Limited. p. 403
  23. ↑ Richard, E. (1911). History of German Civilization: A General Survey. United States: Macmillan. p. 233
  24. ↑ Resnick, I. M., Kitchell Jr., K. F. (2022). Albertus Magnus and the World of Nature. United Kingdom: Reaktion Books. p. 68
  25. ↑ Glick, Thomas F.; Livesey, Steven; Wallis, Faith (2014). Medieval Science, Technology, and Medicine: An Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge. p. 473. ISBN 978-0415969307.
  26. ↑ Cary, H. F. (1906). The vision of Purgatory and Paradise, tr. by H.F. Cary, and with designs of G. Doré. United Kingdom: (n.p.). p. 225
  27. ↑ Encyclopedia Britannica Online, s.v. "William of Moerbeke," last modified July 29, 2026,
  28. ↑ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Order of Preachers". www.newadvent.org.
  29. ↑ The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia: A Work of Universal Reference in All Departments of Knowledge, with a New Atlas of the World. (1897). United States: Century Company. p. 130
  30. ↑ Schoot, Henk J.M. (2001). Language and Christology: The Case of Henry of Gorcum (†1431), Thomist. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 68:1, pp.142-162. doi:10.2143/RTPM.68.1.858
  31. ↑ Aufgebauer, Peter. "Die Verehrung des Hl. Thomas von Aquin in Göttingen." Geschichtsverein für Göttingen und Umgebung, 2015.
  32. ↑ Religion Past & Present: Encyclopedia of Theology and Religion. (2007). Netherlands: Brill. p. 386
  33. ↑ Arbesmann, Rudolphus (2003). "Henry of Friemar". The New Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 6 (2nd ed.). The Catholic University of America Press. pp. 750–751.
  34. ↑ Mojsisch, Burkhard; Summerell, Orrin F. "Meister Eckhart". plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  35. ↑ Brett, G. S. (1912). A History of Psychology. United Kingdom: G. Allen, Limited. p. 126
  36. ↑ Wulf, M. (1926). History of Mediæval Philosophy. United Kingdom: Longmans, Green and Company. p. 252
  37. ↑ Retucci, Fiorella (2012). "On a Dangerous Trail: Henry Suso and the Condemnations of Meister Eckhart". In Hackett, Jeremiah (ed.). A Companion to Meister Eckhart. Brill. pp. 587–606. ISBN 9789004183476. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  38. ↑ KIKUCHI, Satoshi. From Eckhart to Ruusbroec: A Critical Inheritance of Mystical Themes in the Fourteenth Century. Leuven University Press, 2014. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxst1. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  39. ↑ Routledge Revivals: Key Figures in Medieval Europe (2006): An Encyclopedia. (2017). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 365
  40. 1 2 Fiamma, Andrea (2017). "Nicholas of Cusa and the so-Called Cologne School of the 13th and 14th Centuries". Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age. 84: 91–128. ISSN 0373-5478.
  41. ↑ McGinn, Bernard (2005). The Harvest of Mysticism. p. 241.
  42. ↑ Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980. (1980). Netherlands: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. p. 529
  43. ↑ Verboon, A. R. (2021). Lambertus de Monte on the phantasms of unreal things. Reworking Thomas Aquinas's restrictive clause of the formative imagination, or: why animals cannot imagine golden mountains. In O. Pavlíček (Ed.), Studying the Arts in Late Medieval Bohemia: Production, Reception and Transmission of Knowledge (pp. 87–109).
  44. ↑ Overfield, J. H. (2019). Humanism and Scholasticism in Late Medieval Germany. United States: Princeton University Press. p. 37-38
  45. ↑ Zupko, Jack, "Thomas of Erfurt", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/erfurt/>.
  46. ↑ "Munich". atlasofthinkers.com.
  47. ↑ Setton, K. M. (1976). The Papacy and the Levant, 1204-1571: The thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. United States: American Philosophical Society. p. 172
  48. ↑ Gabriel, Astrik L.. ""Via antiqua" and "via moderna" and the Migration of Paris Students and Masters to the German Universities in the Fifteenth Century". Antiqui und Moderni, edited by Albert Zimmermann, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 1974, pp. 439-483. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110838756.439
  49. ↑ Medieval Philosophy. (1997). United Kingdom: Routledge. p. 429
  50. 1 2 "Albert of Saxony - Biography". Maths History. Retrieved 2023-11-22.
  51. ↑ Voegelin, E. (1997). History of Political Ideas. Colombia: University of Missouri Press. p. 246
  52. ↑ Lukács, E. A. (2023). Immovable Truth: Divine Knowledge and the Bible at the University of Vienna (1384-1419). Germany: Brill. p. 86
  53. ↑ Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500. (2010). Germany: Springer. p. 711
  54. ↑ Wikisource One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Biel, Gabriel". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 920.
  55. ↑ Oberman 1967, p. 11.
  56. ↑ Spitz, Lewis W. “The Philosophy of Conrad Celtis, German Arch-Humanist.” Studies in the Renaissance, vol. 1, 1954, pp. 22–37. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2856949. Accessed 4 Aug. 2026.
  57. ↑ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Johann Heynlin of Stein" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  58. ↑ Wikisource This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William Robertson (1911). "Reuchlin, Johann". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 23 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 204–206.
  59. ↑ Wikisource This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William Robertson (1911). "Reuchlin, Johann". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 23 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 204–206.
  60. ↑ Johann Gutenberg at the New Catholic Encyclopedia
  61. ↑ Watanabe, M., Christianson, E. b. G. (2016). Nicholas of Cusa - A Companion to His Life and His Times. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  62. ↑ Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Tradition: A Philosophical and Theological Survey. (2020). Germany: De Gruyter.
  63. ↑ Popkin, R. H. (1979). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes. Netherlands: Vangorcum & Company.
  64. ↑ Hunt, L., Martin, T. R., Rosenwein, B. H., Smith, B. G. (2012). The Making of the West: A Concise History, Volume II: Peoples and Cultures. (n.p.): Bedford/St. Martin's. p. 439
  65. ↑ Little, Katherine (October 29, 2019). "Before Martin Luther, there was Erasmus – a Dutch theologian who paved the way for the Protestant Reformation". The Conversation.
  66. ↑ Hillerbrand, Hans J. (14 February 2024). "Martin Luther". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  67. ↑ Nelson, Robert H. (2017). Lutheranism and the Nordic Spirit of Social Democracy: A Different Protestant Ethic. Aarhus University Press. p. 64. ISBN 9788771844160.
  68. ↑ "ReformationTours.com". Archived from the original on 2007-08-25. Retrieved 2008-01-04.
  69. ↑ Luther’s Works, 34:137
  70. ↑ "Faith Kills Reason".
  71. ↑ Schaff, Philip. The Reformation in Basel. Oecolampadius. History of the Christian Church, Volume VIII: Modern Christianity. The Swiss Reformation. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  72. ↑ Hagenbach, K. R. (1879). History of the Reformation in Germany and Switzerland Chiefly. United Kingdom: T.&T. Clark. p. 80
  73. ↑ The Origins and Characteristics of Anabaptism / Les Debuts Et Les Caracteristiques de L’Anabaptisme: Proceedings of the Colloquium Organized by the Faculty of Protestant Theology of Strasbourg / Actes Du Colloque Organise Par la Faculte de Theologie Protestante de Strasbourg (20–22 February / Fevrier 1975). (2012). Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. p. 35
  74. ↑ Burton, Simon J. G., 'Logics of Faith: Piscator, Herborn Ramism, and the Confessionalization of Method', Ramism and the Reformation of Method: The Franciscan Legacy in Early Modernity (New York, 2024; online edn, Oxford Academic, 30 Apr. 2024), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197516355.003.0004, accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  75. ↑ Blair, Ann. “Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance.” Isis, vol. 91, no. 1, 2000, pp. 32–58. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/237557. Accessed 4 Aug. 2026.
  76. ↑ Brann NL. Was Paracelsus a disciple of Trithemius? Sixt Century J. 1979;10(1):71-82. PMID 11635954.
  77. ↑ The Faustian Century: German Literature and Culture in the Age of Luther and Faustus. (2013). United States: Camden House. p. 101
  78. ↑ Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas (2008). The Western Esoteric Traditions. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0195320992.
  79. ↑ Bailey, Michael D.; Durrant, Jonathan (2012). Historical Dictionary of Witchcraft. Scarecrow Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0810872455.
  80. ↑ Keefer, Michael H.. Agrippa von Nettesheim, Henricus Cornelius (1486–1535), 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-C002-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/agrippa-von-nettesheim-henricus-cornelius-1486-1535/v-1.
  81. ↑ "Paracelsus: Herald of Modern Toxicology". Archived from the original on 24 March 2013. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
  82. ↑ Pagel, Walter. Paracelsus; an Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance. Basel: Karger, 1958. Print.
  83. ↑ de Vries, L. (2021). Reformation, Revolution, Renovation: The Roots and Reception of the Rosicrucian Call for General Reform. Netherlands: Brill. p. 129
  84. ↑ Forshaw, Peter J. “‘Paradoxes, Absurdities, and Madness’: Conflict over Alchemy, Magic and Medicine in the Works of Andreas Libavius and Heinrich Khunrath.” Early Science and Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, 2008, pp. 53–81. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20617709. Accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  85. ↑ Anderson, M. L. (2020). ‘Hearing the Inner Word’: The Eckhartian Roots of Radical Dissent and ‘Enthusiasm.’ Medieval Mystical Theology, 29(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097
  86. ↑ Weeks, A. (2000). Valentin Weigel (1533-1588): German Religious Dissenter, Speculative Theorist, and Advocate of Tolerance. United Kingdom: State University of New York Press.
  87. ↑ Bryant, W. W. (2020). Kepler: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Scientific Revolution. Czechia: Good Press.
  88. ↑ Barker, Peter, and Bernard R. Goldstein. “Theological Foundations of Kepler’s Astronomy.” Osiris, vol. 16, 2001, pp. 88–113. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/301981. Accessed 4 Aug. 2026.
  89. ↑ Kepler, J. (1997). The harmony of the world. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. p. xiv
  90. ↑ Rågstedt, Mikael (2013-06-10). "About the cover: Kepler and the Rudolphine Tables". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 50 (4): 629–639. doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-2013-01416-2. ISSN 0273-0979.
  91. ↑ Brinton, H. H. (1930). The Mystic Will: Based on a Study of the Philosophy of Jacob Boehme. United Kingdom: Macmillan. p. 184
  92. ↑ Weeks, Andrew (1991). Boehme: An Intellectual Biography of the Seventeenth-Century Philosopher and Mystic. State University of New York Press. pp. 2–3. ISBN 978-0-7914-0596-3.
  93. ↑ John Passmore Cambridge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1967) "Historiography of Philosophy" vol. 6 p. 228
  94. ↑ Hamid, Nabeel (2020). Domesticating Descartes, Renovating Scholasticism: Johann Clauberg And The German Reception Of Cartesianism. History of Universities 30 (2):57-84.
  95. ↑ Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin. (2009). Netherlands: Brill.
  96. ↑ Nye, A. (1999). The Princess and the Philosopher: Letters of Elisabeth of the Palatine to Rene Descartes. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
  97. ↑ "Rationalism". Britannica.com. 28 May 2023. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
  98. ↑ Phemister, P. (2006). The Rationalists: Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. United Kingdom: Wiley.
  99. ↑ Muhit, Abdul. "Leibniz on Necessary and Contingent Truths". Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  100. ↑ The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. (2013). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
  101. ↑ PELLETIER, ARNAUD. “Leibniz and the Scholastics.” Studia Leibnitiana, vol. 46, no. 2, 2014, pp. 123–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43695597. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  102. 1 2 3 Eliot, T. Stearns (1916). The Development of Leibniz’s Monadism. The Monist 26 (4):534-556.
  103. ↑ Doggett, Tyler. “Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 149, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1–18. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40606340. Accessed 3 Aug. 2026.
  104. ↑ Locke and Leibniz on Substance. (2015). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 179
  105. 1 2 Futch, M (2008). Leibniz's metaphysics of time and space. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-8237-5. OCLC 233972723.
  106. 1 2 Rutherford D. "Theodicy". In: Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge University Press; 1995:5-6.
  107. ↑ Murray, S. (2009). The Library: An Illustrated History. United States: Skyhorse Pub.
  108. ↑ Janiak, Andrew, "Newton’s Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/newton-philosophy/>.
  109. ↑ Mayhall, D. B. (1939). The Controversy Between Newton and Leibniz on the Discovery of the Calculus. (n.p.): University of Mississippi.
  110. 1 2 Perler, Dominik. Review of Occasionalism and the Debate About Causation in Early Modern Germany, by Christian Henkel. Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 63 no. 3, 2025, p. 488-489. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2025.a964616.
  111. ↑ Pufendorf's International Political and Legal Thought. (2024). Kiribati: Oxford University Press. p. 24
  112. ↑ Mulsow, Martin (2023). The Hidden Origins of the German Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
  113. 1 2 3 Hettche, Matt and Corey Dyck, "Christian Wolff", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/wolff-christian/>.
  114. ↑ Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment. (2013). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 674
  115. 1 2 "Hegel's History of Philosophy". www.marxists.org.
  116. ↑ Chassefiere, E. (2023). Observers of the Aurora Borealis in Europe: Journey Into the Learned World of the Enlightenment. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. p.131
  117. ↑ Koeller, D. W. (1989). The Physics of Freedom: The Beginnings of Schellings's Philosophy of Nature. United States: University of California, Berkeley. p. 37
  118. ↑ Forbes, E. G. (1980). Tobias Mayer, (1723-62), Pioneer of Enlightened Science in Germany. Germany: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
  119. ↑ "Tobias Mayer - Biography". Maths History.
  120. ↑ Hintikka, Jaakko J., Spade, Paul Vincent. "history of logic". Encyclopedia Britannica, 17 Dec. 2020, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-logic. Accessed 3 August 2026.
  121. ↑ Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology: Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Yourgrau. (2012). Switzerland: Plenum Press. p. 594
  122. ↑ Werner J. Milch. “Georg Christoph Lichtenberg: On the Occasion of the Two Hundredth Anniversary of His Birth, 9 July 1942.” The Modern Language Review, vol. 37, no. 3, 1942, pp. 335–55. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3717893. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  123. ↑ The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. (2016). India: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 837
  124. ↑ Grote, S. (2017). The Emergence of Modern Aesthetic Theory: Religion and Morality in Enlightenment Germany and Scotland. (n.p.): Cambridge University Press. p. 69
  125. ↑ Arkush, Allan. Mendelssohn, Moses (1729–86), 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-J034-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/mendelssohn-moses-1729-86/v-1
  126. ↑ Camposampiero, Matteo Favaretti. "The Boundaries of Existence: Mendelssohn's Proof in Light of Wolff and Boscovich." Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 62 no. 1, 2024, p. 75-99. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2024.a916712.
  127. 1 2 The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. (2016). India: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 499
  128. ↑ Kirsch, Adam (Summer 2016). "Saladin, a Knight, and a Jew Walk Onto a Stage". Jewish Review of Books. Retrieved 6 September 2016.
  129. ↑ Yasukata, T. (2002). Lessing's Philosophy of Religion and the German Enlightenment. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p.56
  130. ↑ Wikisource One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Reimarus, Hermann Samuel". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 23 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 53.
  131. ↑ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Nicolai, Christoph Friedrich" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 662.
  132. ↑ Allison, H. E., Kant, I. (1973). The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. United States: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  133. ↑ Giorgio Tonelli "Eberhard, Johann Christian". Cambridge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  134. ↑ Lacaille, Julien. The Theory of Objectivity by Johann Nikolaus Tetens.
  135. ↑ Zoller, Gunter. Tetens, Johann Nicolaus (1736–1807), 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-DB064-1. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/tetens-johann-nicolaus-1736-1807/v-1.
  136. ↑ Kuehn, Manfred. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768-1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt130hhf3. Accessed 10 Sept. 2026.
  137. 1 2 Grain, Kerrie (April 1, 2014). "Martin Knutzen".
  138. 1 2 Guyer, P. (2006). Kant. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  139. ↑ Falkenburg, B. (2020). Kant’s Cosmology: From the Pre-Critical System to the Antinomy of Pure Reason. Germany: Springer International Publishing. P. 240
  140. ↑ Hall, Bryan, et al. The Arguments of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. United Kingdom, Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.
  141. ↑ The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. (2009). United Kingdom: Wiley.
  142. ↑ Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  143. ↑ Kant, I. (1756a) "Von den Ursachen der Erderschütterungen bei Gelegenheit des Unglücks, welches die westliche Länder von Europa gegen das Ende des vorigen Jahres betroffen hat" [On the causes of the earthquakes on the occasion of the disaster which affected the western countries of Europe towards the end of last year] In: Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences), ed.s (1902) Kant's gesammelte Schriften [Kant's collected writings] (in German) Berlin, Germany: G. Reimer. vol. 1, pp. 417–427.
  144. ↑ Kant, I. (1756b) "Geschichte und Naturbeschreibung der merkwürdigsten Vorfälle des Erdbebens, welches an dem Ende des 1755sten Jahres einen großen Theil der Erde erschüttert hat" [History and description of the nature of the most remarkable events of the earthquake which shook a large part of the Earth at the end of the year 1755], ibid. pp. 429–461.
  145. ↑ Kant, I. (1756c) "Immanuel Kants fortgesetzte Betrachtung der seit einiger Zeit wahrgenommenen Erderschütterungen" [Immanuel Kant's continued consideration of the earthquakes that were felt some time ago], ibid. pp. 463–472.
  146. ↑ Amador, Filomena (2004) "The causes of 1755 Lisbon earthquake on Kant" In: Escribano Benito, J.J.; Español González, L.; Martínez García, M.A., ed.s. Actas VIII Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas [Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the Spanish Society of the History of the Sciences and Technology] (in English) Logroño, Spain: Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas (Universidad de la Rioja), vol. 2, pp. 485–495.
  147. ↑ Vicchio, S. (2020). Theodicy in the Christian Tradition: A History. United States: Dorrance Publishing Company, Incorporated. p. 426
  148. ↑ Windelband, W. (1895). A History of Philosophy with Especial Reference to the Formation and Development of Its Problems and Conceptions. United Kingdom: Macmillan and Company. p. 587
  149. 1 2 Frederick C. Beiser, German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801, Harvard University Press, 2002, part I.
  150. 1 2 3 Beiser, Fate of Reason, p. 9
  151. ↑ Theodor W. Adorno, Hegel: Three Studies, MIT Press, 1994, p.ix
  152. ↑ Palmer, R. R. (2016). The World of the French Revolution. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  153. ↑ Carr, W., Wetzel, D. (2023). A History of Germany, 1800 to the Present. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  154. ↑ Aleksandrov, G. F.; Bykhovsky, B. E.; Mitin, B. M.; Yudin, P. F. (1943). "Гаман, in: Классическая немецкая философия" (PDF). История философии, T. III. Философия первой половины XIX века. Moscow: Politizdat.
  155. ↑ Goldman, A. (2012). Kant and the Subject of Critique: On the Regulative Role of the Psychological Idea. Ukraine: Indiana University Press. p.25
  156. ↑ Anderson, Abraham (2020). Kant, Hume, and the Interruption of Dogmatic Slumber. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  157. ↑ "Johann Georg Hamann (1730—1788)". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  158. ↑ Riley P. Kant on the General Will. In: Farr J, Williams DL, eds. The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept. Cambridge University Press; 2015:333-349.
  159. ↑ Nevinson, H. W. (1884). “A” Sketch of Herder and His Times. United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall. p. 162
  160. ↑ Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. (1961). United States: Catholic University of America Press. p. 83
  161. ↑ Beiser, Fate of Reason, p. 128
  162. ↑ Booth, A. J. (1902). The Discovery and Decipherment of the Trilingual Cuneiform Inscriptions. India: Longmans, Green, and Company. p. 82
  163. ↑ Casini, S. (2020). Language Creativity: A Semiotic Perspective. United States: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 429
  164. ↑ History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. (1976). Germany: de Gruyter. p. 98
  165. ↑ Jackson, Stephen T. "Alexander von Humboldt and the General Physics of the Earth" (PDF). Science. Vol. 324. pp. 596–597. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-12. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
  166. ↑ "Berlin's oldest university faces new challenges as it turns 200". Deutsche Welle. 15 October 2010. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  167. ↑ Norberg, J. (2022). The Brothers Grimm and the Making of German Nationalism. India: Cambridge University Press. p. 64
  168. ↑ The Masterpieces and the History of Literature,: Analysis, Criticism, Character and Incident. (1906). United States: Hamilton book Company. p. 405
  169. ↑ Kellogg, M. K. (2025). The Wisdom of the Romantics. United States: Globe Pequot. p. 48
  170. ↑ Dahlin, Bo (22 June 2017). Rudolf Steiner: The Relevance of Waldorf Education. Springer. p. 45. ISBN 978-3-319-58907-7.
  171. ↑ Rockmore, Tom (3 May 2016). German Idealism as Constructivism. University of Chicago Press. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-226-34990-9.
  172. ↑ "Goethe's Romantic Science by Andy Blunden March 2009". www.ethicalpolitics.org.
  173. ↑ Darwin, C., Costa, J. T. (2009). The Annotated Origin: A Facsimile of the First Edition of On the Origin of Species. United Kingdom: Harvard University Press. p. 147
  174. ↑ Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature. (1998). United States: State University of New York Press. p. 5
  175. ↑ Carlyle, T. (1825). The Life of Friedrich Schiller. United Kingdom: Taylor and Hessey. p. 119
  176. ↑ The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. (2016). India: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 3
  177. ↑ Posesorski, E. L. (2012). Between Reinhold and Fichte: August Ludwig Hülsen's Contribution to the Emergence of German Idealism. Germany: KIT Scientific Publishing.
  178. ↑ Frederick C. Beiser, German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801, Harvard University Press, 2002, p. viii: "the young romantics—Hölderlin, Schlegel, Novalis—[were] crucial figures in the development of German idealism."
  179. ↑ Beiser, F. C. (2008). German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. United Kingdom: Harvard University Press. p. 443
  180. ↑ Brian Leiter, Michael Rosen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 175
  181. ↑ Nivala, A. (2017). The Romantic Idea of the Golden Age in Friedrich Schlegel's Philosophy of History. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 151
  182. ↑ de Bończa Bukowski, P. (2023). Friedrich Schleiermacher’s Pathways of Translation: Issues of Language and Communication. Germany: De Gruyter. p. 82
  183. ↑ Michaelis, Rolf (27 January 1980). "Hölderlin: Hyperion". Die Zeit (in German).
  184. ↑ Warnes, Christopher (2006). "Magical Realism and the Legacy of German Idealism". The Modern Language Review. 101 (2): 488–498. doi:10.2307/20466796. JSTOR 20466796. S2CID 170406207. Limited access icon (registration required)
  185. ↑ Wikisource One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Kleist, Bernd Heinrich Wilhelm von". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 845–846.
  186. ↑ "Expanding Hermeneutics". Archived from the original on 2011-06-04. Retrieved 2010-09-10.
  187. ↑ "Richard e. Palmer: Hermeneutics and the Disciplines". Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2010-09-10.
  188. ↑ Lewis, A.C. (1981). F. Schleiermacher’s Influence on H. Grassmann’s Mathematics. In: Mehrtens, H., Bos, H., Schneider, I. (eds) Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9491-4_15
  189. 1 2 Alexander, A. B. D. (1907). A Short History of Philosophy. United Kingdom: J. Maclehose and sons. p. 413-415
  190. ↑ Royce, J. (1896). The Spirit of Modern Philosophy: An Essay in the Form of Lectures. United States: Houghton, Mifflin and Company. p. 477
  191. ↑ Pfleiderer, O. (1886). The Philosophy of Religion on the Basis of Its History: Spinoza to Schleiermacher. United Kingdom: Williams and Norgate. p. 284
  192. ↑ Lavretsky, A. (1934). "The Romantic Period of German Literature". Literary Encyclopedia. Translated by P., Anton. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya.
  193. ↑ Barnard, F. M. “National Culture and Political Legitimacy: Herder and Rousseau.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 44, no. 2, 1983, pp. 231–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2709138. Accessed 11 Sept. 2026.
  194. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rosenthal, Mark & Yudin, Pavel (1954). "German Philosophy". A Short Philosophical Dictionary, fifth edition. Translated by P., Anton. Moscow: Gospolitizdat.
  195. ↑ Fichte, Johann (1806). "Address to the German Nation". Fordham University. Archived from the original on August 14, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2013.
  196. ↑ Smith, Hugh (June 25, 2012). "Clausewitz as Sociologist". Infinity Journal. doi:10.64148/msm.article.549 – via www.militarystrategymagazine.com.
  197. ↑ Kitchen, M., Rossi, L. F. (2023). A History of Modern Germany: 1800 to the Present. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. p. 54
  198. ↑ Mah, H. (2018). Enlightenment Phantasies: Cultural Identity in France and Germany, 1750–1914. United Kingdom: Cornell University Press. p. 168
  199. ↑ "Romanticism and Vormärz, 1800-1848". www.nthuleen.com.
  200. ↑ Lukács, György (1980) [1952]. "Schelling's 'Intellectual Intuition' as the First Manifestation of Irrationalism" (PDF). The Destruction of Reason. Translated by Palmer, Peter R. London: Merlin Press.
  201. ↑ Taverne, D. (2006). The March of Unreason: Science, Democracy, and the New Fundamentalism. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  202. ↑ Grant, I. H. (2008). Philosophies of Nature After Schelling. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  203. ↑ Pfleiderer, O. (1886). The Philosophy of Religion on the Basis of Its History: Schelling to the present day. United Kingdom: Williams and Norgate. p. 95
  204. ↑ Wirth, Jason M. (October 4, 2011). "Review of Freedom and Nature in Schelling's Philosophy of Art" – via Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
  205. ↑ "Topics Worth Investigating". philosophy.lander.edu.
  206. 1 2 3 "Schelling". Der Volks-Brockhaus : deutsches Sach- und Sprachwörterbuch fur Schule und Haus : A-Z. Leipzig: Verlag F. A. Brockhaus. 1939. Archived from the original on 2021-10-05. Retrieved 2021-08-26.
  207. ↑ Aleksandrov, G. F.; Bykhovsky, B. E.; Mitin, B. M.; Yudin, P. F. (1943). "Шеллинг, in: Классическая немецкая философия" (PDF). История философии, T. III. Философия первой половины XIX века. Moscow: Politizdat.
  208. ↑ Rustamova, Zaya. “Spanish Krausism: Visions of Spain’s Progressive Future through the Prism of German Philosophy.” Hispanic Studies Review, vol. 6, no. 1, Apr. 2022.
  209. ↑ The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. (2020). Germany: Springer International Publishing. p. 5
  210. ↑ Priest, Graham. "Inconsistencies in Motion." American Philosophical Quarterly 22, no. 4 (1985): 339–46. JSTOR 20014114.
  211. ↑ Jackson, I. (2017). The Phenomenology of Spirit. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  212. ↑ Harris, W. T. (1970). Hegel's Logic: A Book on the Genesis of the Categories of the Mind. A Critical Exposition. United States: Kraus Reprint Company. p. 125
  213. ↑ Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich (2010-11-29). Brinkmann, Klaus; Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (eds.). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline, Part 1, Science of Logic. Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 9780521829144.
  214. ↑ Kainz, H. P. (1996). An introduction to Hegel : the stages of modern philosophy. Athens: Ohio University Press.
  215. ↑ Brooks, Thom. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh University Press, 2007. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r2cb6. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  216. ↑ Beiser, F. C. (2009). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Germany: Harvard.
  217. ↑ Fate of Reason, p. 119
  218. ↑ Hampton, Alxander J. (ed.), 2023. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment: Religion, Philosophy, and Reason at the Crux of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  219. ↑ Rose 1983, p. xv.
  220. ↑ Stewart, Jon B. Kierkegaard and his German contemporaries, 2007
  221. ↑ Lukács, György (1980) [1952]. "Kierkegaard" (PDF). The Destruction of Reason. Translated by Palmer, Peter R. London: Merlin Press.
  222. ↑ "Letters on the Kantian Philosophy". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
  223. ↑ Breazeale, Dan; Walsh, John (July 30, 2022). Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  224. 1 2 Beiser, F. C. (2013). Late German Idealism: Trendelenburg and Lotze. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  225. ↑ Gibson, W. R. B. (1915). Rudolf Eucken's Philosophy of Life. United Kingdom: A. & C. Black. p. 6
  226. ↑ Jones, W. T. (2023). An Interpretation of Rudolf Eucken's Philosophy: Exploring Ethical Activism and Spiritual Intuition in German Philosophy. Czechia: Good Press.
  227. ↑ Dorrien, G. (2015). Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology. United Kingdom: Wiley. p. 256
  228. ↑ Wikisource This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Canney, Maurice Arthur (1911). "Daub, Karl". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 846.
  229. ↑ Moland, Lydia L. (2019). Hegel's Aesthetics: The Art of Idealism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-084732-6. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  230. 1 2 Cooper, B. (1984). The End of History: An Essay on Modern Hegelianism. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  231. ↑ Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 339 n. 58.
  232. ↑ Warren Breckman, Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self, Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 49.
  233. ↑ Kelly Parker, Krzysztof Skowronski (eds.), Josiah Royce for the Twenty-first Century: Historical, Ethical, and Religious Interpretations, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 202.
  234. ↑ Woodward, W. R. (2015). Hermann Lotze: An Intellectual Biography. United States: Cambridge University Press.
  235. ↑ William R. Woodward, Hermann Lotze: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 74–5.
  236. 1 2 Breckman, W. (1999). Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  237. ↑ Nietzsche, F. (2021). David Strauss: The Confessor and the Writer: Enriched Edition. Reexamining Faith and Reason in 19th Century Literature. Czechia: Good Press.
  238. ↑ Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity. (2017). United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  239. ↑ Barbour, Charles (2024). The Political Theology and Polemical Tactics of Bruno Bauer. The European Legacy 29 (2):143-165.
  240. ↑ Anthropomorphic Depictions of God: The Concept of God in Judaic, Christian, and Islamic Traditions: Representing the Unrepresentable. (2012). United Kingdom: International Institute of Islamic Thought. p. 9
  241. ↑ Kamenka, E. (1970). The philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach. London: Praeger. p. xiv
  242. ↑ Welsh, J. F. (2010). Max Stirner's Dialectical Egoism: A New Interpretation. United States: Lexington Books.
  243. ↑ 1830-1848, the End of Metaphysics as a Transformation of Culture. (2003). Belgium: Peeters.
  244. ↑ Vogt (1874, p. 323)
  245. ↑ Merz, J. T. (1907). A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century. United Kingdom: W. Blackwood. p. 562
  246. ↑ "How a Founding Socialist Inspired Karl Marx, and Then Went on to Herald the State of Israel". Tikvah Ideas.
  247. ↑ Rigby, S. H. (2024). Marxism and History: A Critical Introduction. United Kingdom: Manchester University Press.
  248. ↑ Marxist Historical Cultures and Social Movements During the Cold War: Case Studies from Germany, Italy and Other Western European States. (2019). Germany: Springer International Publishing.
  249. ↑ The German Ideology, p. 47
  250. ↑ "Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I - 1873 Afterword [Abstract]". www.marxists.org.
  251. ↑ "The Holy Family by Marx and Engels". Marxists.org. Retrieved 13 February 2010.
  252. ↑ Engels, Friedrich (1970) [1892]. "Introduction". Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Marx/Engels Selected Works. Vol. 3. Progress Publishers. Cited in Carver, Terrell (2003). Engels: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-19-280466-2.
  253. ↑ Thomas, Paul (1991), "Critical Reception: Marx then and now", in Carver, Terrell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Marx, Cambridge University Press
  254. ↑ Engels. "1883-Dialectics of Nature-Index". marxists.anu.edu.au. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  255. ↑ Gay, P. (1952). The dilemma of democratic socialism: Eduard Bernstein's challenge to Marx.. Germany: Columbia University Press. p. 83
  256. 1 2 Labriola, A., Untermann, E. (1907). Socialism and Philosophy. United States: C. H. Kerr. p. 229-230
  257. ↑ Routledge Handbook of Degrowth. (2025). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  258. ↑ Herbert Tuttle (1883). "Academic Socialism". The Atlantic Monthly. 52 (310).
  259. ↑ Bismarck. (1919 by C. Grant Robertson, p. 383
  260. ↑ The Historical School: From Friedrich List to the Social Market Economy. (2024).
  261. ↑ Magee, B. (1983). The philosophy of Schopenhauer. United Kingdom: Clarendon Press. p. 13
  262. ↑ Aleksandrov, G. F.; Bykhovsky, B. E.; Mitin, B. M.; Yudin, P. F. (1943). "Шопенгауэр, in: Классическая немецкая философия" (PDF). История философии, T. III. Философия первой половины XIX века. Moscow: Politizdat.
  263. ↑ "Schlegel". Der Volks-Brockhaus : deutsches Sach- und Sprachwörterbuch fur Schule und Haus : A-Z. Leipzig: Verlag F. A. Brockhaus. 1939. Archived from the original on 2021-10-05. Retrieved 2021-08-26.
  264. ↑ Arthur Schopenhauer, Manuscript Remains, Vol. 2, Berg, 1988, ISBN 0-85496-539-4.
  265. ↑ The Freud Encyclopedia: Theory, Therapy, and Culture. (2002). United Kingdom: Routledge. p. 506
  266. ↑ The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 2, Ch. 48 (Dover page 616)
  267. ↑ "Schopenhauer on aesthetics and the goal of art". Honeysuckle Walks.
  268. ↑ Monika Langer, Nietzsche's Gay Science: Dancing Coherence, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, p. 231.
  269. ↑ Beiser, Frederick C., Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 40).
  270. ↑ Beiser, Frederick C., Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 213 n. 30.
  271. ↑ "From Universality to Plurality: Mainländer and the Afterlife of International Law". May 5, 2026.
  272. ↑ The Westminster Review. (1876). United Kingdom: J. Chapman. p. 522
  273. ↑ Brobjer, Thomas H. (2008). Nietzsche's Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography. University Of Illinois Press. p. 149. ISBN 9780252032455.
  274. ↑ William W. Ireland (May 21, 1892). "Pessimism In Its Relation to Suicide". The Literary Digest. 5 (3): 8.
  275. ↑ Stauffer, Robert C. “Haeckel, Darwin, and Ecology.” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 32, no. 2, 1957, pp. 138–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2816117. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  276. ↑ Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm; Monism and the Religion of Science: How a German New Religious Movement Birthed American Academic Philosophy. Nova Religio 1 November 2021; 25 (2): 12–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2021.25.2.12
  277. ↑ Freyhofer, H. H. (1982). The Vitalism of Hans Driesch: The Success and Decline of a Scientific Theory. Germany: P. Lang.
  278. ↑ The Continuum Companion to Kant. (2012). United Kingdom: Continuum International Publishing. p. 300
  279. 1 2 Luft 2015, p. xxvi.
  280. ↑ Beiser, Frederick C., 'Eduard Zeller, Neo-Kantian Classicist', The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796-1880 (Oxford, 2014; online edn, Oxford Academic, 22 Jan. 2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.003.0007, accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  281. ↑ Nguyen, D. L. (2022). Walter Benjamin and the Critique of Political Economy: A New Historical Materialism. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  282. ↑ Widmer ET. Max Adler’s Neo-Kantian Reinvention of Marx’s Notion of History. Kantian Review. Published online 2025:1-19. doi:10.1017/S1369415425100770
  283. ↑ 1. Luft S. The philosophy of the Marburg School: from the critique of scientific cognition to the philosophy of culture. In: de Warren N, Staiti A, eds. New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism. Cambridge University Press; 2015:221-239.
  284. ↑ Zank, M. (2000). The Idea of Atonement in the Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. United States: Brown Judaic Studies. p. 175
  285. ↑ The Continuum Companion to Kant. (2012). United Kingdom: Continuum International Publishing. p. 302
  286. ↑ Treiber, H. (2020). Reading Max Weber's Sociology of Law. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 12
  287. ↑ Loader, Colin. “Free Floating: The Intelligentsia in the Work of Alfred Weber and Karl Mannheim.” German Studies Review, vol. 20, no. 2, 1997, pp. 217–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1431946. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  288. ↑ Helmut Pulte (2013), "J. F. Fries' Philosophy of Science, the New Friesian School and the Berlin Group: On Divergent Scientific Philosophies, Difficult Relations and Missed Opportunities", in: N. Milkov & V. Peckhaus (eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Springer, pp. 43–66.
  289. ↑ Preti, C. (2021). The Metaphysical Basis of Ethics: G.E. Moore and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Germany: Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 21
  290. ↑ Kusch, Martin (August 10, 2026). Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  291. ↑ Klautke, E. (2013). The Mind of the Nation: Völkerpsychologie in Germany, 1851-1955. Germany: Berghahn Books. p. 87
  292. ↑ Pelegrin, L. 2024. “Paul Natorp and the Psychologismusstreit”, Revista de Filosofia, 31, pp. 194-204.
  293. ↑ Lukács, György (1980) [1952]. "Nietzsche as Founder of Irrationalism in the Imperialist Period". The Destruction of Reason. Translated by Palmer, Peter R. London: Merlin Press.
  294. ↑ Kaufmann, W. A. (1950). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. United States: World Publishing Company. xiv
  295. ↑ "Reactionary German Romanticism". Anasintaxi Newspaper, issue 385. 2013.
  296. ↑ Kogan, Pyotr Semyonovich (1936). "Ніцшеанство і символізм. Ібсен. Метерлінк." (PDF). Нариси історії західноєвропейської літератури.
  297. ↑ Kaufmann, p. 81
  298. ↑ "Eternal Recurrence Revisited | Issue 137 | Philosophy Now". philosophynow.org.
  299. ↑ Mencken, H. L. (2003). The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. United States: See Sharp Press. p. 28
  300. ↑ Beiser, Frederick C. (2023). Philosophy of Life: German Lebensphilosophie 1870-1920. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
  301. ↑ "Richard e. Palmer: Hermeneutics and the Disciplines". Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2010-09-10.
  302. ↑ Makkreel, R. A. (1992). Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. United States: Princeton University Press.
  303. ↑ Lukács, György (1980) [1952]. "Dilthey as Founder of Imperialistic Vitalism, in: Vitalism (Lebensphilosophie) in Imperialist Germany" (PDF). The Destruction of Reason. Translated by Palmer, Peter R. London: Merlin Press.
  304. ↑ Josephson-Storm, Jason. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. University of Chicago Press. p. 221. ISBN 9780226403533.
  305. ↑ Zank, Michael and Zachary Braiterman, "Martin Buber", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2026 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2026/entries/buber/>.
  306. ↑ Stein, Ludwig. “Historical Optimism: Wilhelm Dilthey.” The Philosophical Review, vol. 33, no. 4, 1924, pp. 329–44. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2179222. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  307. ↑ Ernst, Mach (2019). Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. Forgotten Books. ISBN 978-0-243-66619-5. OCLC 1147811644.
  308. ↑ Banks, Erik C. (2004). The philosophical roots of Ernst Mach's economy of thought. Synthese 139 (1):23-53.
  309. ↑ Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence. (2019). Germany: Springer International Publishing. p. 15
  310. 1 2 Krauss, C. R. (2023). The Philosophy of Joseph Petzoldt: From Mach's Positivism to Einstein's Relativity. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 96
  311. ↑ Textor, M. (2021). The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn Against Metaphysics: Austrian Philosophy 1874-1918. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  312. ↑ The Austrian Contribution to Analytic Philosophy. (2006). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  313. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 2.
  314. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 28.
  315. 1 2 Brentano 1973.
  316. ↑ Jacob, Pierre, "Intentionality", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/intentionality/>.
  317. ↑ Albertazzi, Liliana ; Jacquette, Dale & Poli, Roberto (2001). The School of Alexius Meinong. Routledge.
  318. ↑ The School of Franz Brentano. (2013). Germany: Springer Netherlands. p. 164
  319. ↑ Donnelly, V. (2007). Saving beauty : form as the key to Balthasar's Christology. Austria: Peter Lang. p. 43
  320. ↑ Będkowski 2020, p. 283.
  321. 1 2 O'Hear, Anthony (1999), German Philosophy Since Kant, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Royal Institute of Philosophy London, vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, p. 110, ISBN 9780521667821
  322. ↑ Lehner, Ulrich L., 'Catholic Theology and the Enlightenment (1670–1815)', in Lewis Ayres, and Medi Ann Volpe (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology, Oxford Handbooks (2019; online edn, Oxford Academic, 5 May 2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566273.013.14, accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  323. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 162.
  324. ↑ "Let's Settle This Once and For All: Who Really Was the Greatest Philosopher of the 20th-Century?" Archived June 8, 2017, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on July 29, 2009
  325. ↑ Russell, B. (2025). The Philosophy of Leibniz. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  326. ↑ Russell, B. “Recent Work on the Philosophy of Leibniz.” Mind, vol. 12, no. 46, 1903, pp. 177–201. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2248176. Accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  327. ↑ Pulkkinen, J. (2001). Russell and the neo-Kantians. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 32(1), 27–43.
  328. ↑ Hew_Strachan, The First World War: Volume I: To Arms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 1131-1132.
  329. ↑ Blackbourn, D. (2023). Germany in the World: A Global History, 1500-2000. United States: Liveright.
  330. ↑ The Berlin Wall: Representations and Perspectives. (1996). Austria: P. Lang.
  331. ↑ Hayek, F. A., Bartley, W. W., Klein, P. G., Caldwell, B., Peart, S. J. (1992). The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek: The fortunes of liberalism. United States: University of Chicago Press. p. 23
  332. ↑ "Richard Kroner". giffordlectures.org.
  333. ↑ Swer, Gregory Morgan (2021). Science Fiction: Science, Vaihinger and Spengler's Fictionalist Philosophy of Science. In David Engels, Gerd Morgenthaler & Max Otte, Oswald Spengler in an Age of Globalisation. Berlin/Lüdinghausen: Manuscriptum. pp. 197-225.
  334. ↑ Lewis, B. (2022). Oswald Spengler and the Politics of Decline. United Kingdom: Berghahn Books.
  335. 1 2 Sternhell, Z. (2010). The Anti-enlightenment Tradition. United Kingdom: Yale University Press. p. 21
  336. ↑ Farrenkopf, J. (2001). Prophet of decline : Spengler on world history and politics. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  337. ↑ G. Swer. (2020) ‘The Revolt Against Reason: Oswald Spengler and Violence as Cultural Preservative’. Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence, Volume 4. Issue 1. pgs. 123-148. https://doi.org/10.22618/TP.PJCV.20204.1.201008
  338. 1 2 Stirk, S. D. (1969). The Prussian Spirit: A Survey of German Literature and Politics, 1914-1940. United States: Kennikat Press.
  339. ↑ Rohkrämer, T. (2007). A Single Communal Faith? The German Right from Conservatism to National Socialism. United Kingdom: Berghahn Books. p. 161
  340. ↑ Krol, R. (2021). Germany's Conscience: Friedrich Meinecke: Champion of German Historicism. Germany: transcript Verlag.
  341. ↑ Kets, Gaard; Muldoon, James (2019-05-02). The German Revolution and Political Theory. Springer. ISBN 3030139174. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
  342. ↑ Hoffrogge, R. (2014). Working-Class Politics in the German Revolution: Richard Müller, the Revolutionary Shop Stewards and the Origins of the Council Movement. Netherlands: Brill.
  343. ↑ Ben Rosamond, Theories of European Integration, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, pp. 21–22.
  344. ↑ DREHER, CARL. “SPENGLER AND THE THIRD REICH.” The Virginia Quarterly Review, vol. 15, no. 2, 1939, pp. 176–93. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26456737. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  345. ↑ Kershaw, Ian (2008). Hitler: A Biography. W.W. Norton & Co. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-393-33761-7.
  346. ↑ Richard Wires (1985), Terminology of the Third Reich, Ball State University, p. 44
  347. ↑ The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt. (2016). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. xxiv
  348. ↑ "Martin Heidegger Political Texts, 1933-1934" (PDF).
  349. ↑ Latour, C. F. “Portrait of a German Historian, Friedrich Meinecke, 1862-1954.” The Historian, vol. 17, no. 2, 1955, pp. 157–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24442308. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026. p. 89
  350. ↑ Latour, C. F. “Portrait of a German Historian, Friedrich Meinecke, 1862-1954.” The Historian, vol. 17, no. 2, 1955, pp. 157–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24442308. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
  351. ↑ "Nobel Prize Substitutes". Current History. 47: 93. 1937.
  352. ↑ Chamberlain, H. S. (2005). Political Ideals. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 47
  353. ↑ Solms-Laubach, F. z. (2012). Nietzsche and Early German and Austrian Sociology. Germany: De Gruyter. p. 49
  354. ↑ Kozyra, W. (2025). "Chapter 3 Nazi Reception of Kant and the Locality of Reason: the Case of Ernst Krieck". In Locality of Reason. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004743922_005
  355. ↑ Fabricius, C. (1937). Positive Christianity in the Third Reich. Germany: H. Püschel.
  356. ↑ Karlsson, T. (2019). Nightside of the Runes: Uthark, Adulruna, and the Gothic Cabbala. United States: Inner Traditions/Bear.
  357. ↑ Joffe, Lawrence (October 10, 2003). "Emil Fackenheim" – via The Guardian.
  358. ↑ Reed, D. (2010). Origins of Analytic Philosophy: Kant and Frege. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 114
  359. ↑ Mosser, Kurt, "Kant and the Logic of Aristotle" (2004). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 22. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/phl_fac_pub/22
  360. ↑ Logicism and the Philosophy of Language: Selections from Frege and Russell. (2003). (n.p.): Broadview Press. p. 26
  361. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 5.
  362. ↑ Searle, J. (2011, October 26). Searle: Philosophy of Language [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk5pIzCNOzU
  363. ↑ The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. (2013). United Kingdom: OUP Oxford. p. 710
  364. ↑ Tait, W. W. (1996). Frege versus Cantor and Dedekind: On the Concept of Number. In Matthias Schirn, Frege: Importance and Legacy. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. pp. 70-113.
  365. ↑ Gabriel, Gottfried, 'Frege, Lotze, and the Continental Roots of Early Analytic Philosophy', From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (New York, 2002; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Nov. 2003), https://doi.org/10.1093/0195133269.003.0002, accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  366. ↑ Shapiro, S. (2000). Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  367. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 22.
  368. ↑ Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein : the duty of genius. London: Cape. p. 19
  369. ↑ Monk 1990, p. 173.
  370. ↑ Ramsey 1923.
  371. ↑ Grayling, A. C. (2001). Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
  372. ↑ Monk 1990, pp. 117–118.
  373. ↑ Wittgenstein 1922, 6.1-6.12.
  374. ↑ Monk 1990, pp. 142, 156.
  375. ↑ Monk 1990, pp. 143, 150, 156.
  376. ↑ Ayer 1959, p. 284.
  377. ↑ Wittgenstein 1922, 7.1.
  378. 1 2 Stadler, F. (2015). The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism. Germany: Springer International Publishing.
  379. ↑ Monk 1990, pp. 286–287.
  380. ↑ "Savants Move to Abandon Metaphysical Philosophy". Baltimore Sun. December 31, 1935.
  381. ↑ Neurath Reconsidered: New Sources and Perspectives. (2019). Germany: Springer International Publishing. p. 304
  382. ↑ Milkov, Nikolay (2013). The Berlin Group and the Vienna Circle: Affinities and Divergences. In Nikolay Milkov & Volker Peckhaus, The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Berlin: Springer. pp. 3--32.
  383. ↑ Walter P. van Stigt, L.E.J. Brouwer, The Signific Interlude, Editor(s): A.S. Troelstra, D. van Dalen, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Elsevier, Volume 110, 1982, Pages 505-512, ISSN 0049-237X, ISBN 9780444864949, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70147-8.
  384. ↑ Nagel, E., Newman, J. R. (2008). Gödel's Proof. United Kingdom: NYU Press.
  385. ↑ Ayer 1959, p. 6.
  386. ↑ Carnap, Rudolf (1950). "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology". Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 4 (11): 20–40. JSTOR 23932367. Retrieved 27 November 2025.
  387. ↑ Richardson, A. W. (1998). Carnap's construction of the world : the 'Aufbau' and the emergence of logical empiricism. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  388. ↑ Brewer, W. D. (2022). Kurt Gödel: The Genius of Metamathematics. Poland: Springer International Publishing. p. 242
  389. ↑ Hacohen, Malachi H. “Karl Popper, the Vienna Circle, and Red Vienna.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 59, no. 4, 1998, pp. 711–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3653940. Accessed 10 Sept. 2026.
  390. ↑ Monk, Duty of Genius
  391. ↑ Binkley, T. (2012). Wittgenstein’s Language. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. p. 101
  392. ↑ Richter, D. (2014). Historical Dictionary of Wittgenstein's Philosophy. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 74
  393. ↑ Jacquette, D. (1998). Wittgenstein's thought in transition. United States: Purdue University Press. p. 294
  394. ↑ Culture and Value, p. 19
  395. ↑ Peach, Filiz. Death, “Deathlessness” and Existenz in Karl Jaspers’ Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press, 2008. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r214t. Accessed 10 Aug. 2026.
  396. ↑ Winston, Morton (February 2009). "Hannah Arendt and the Challenge of Modernity: A Phenomenology of Human Rights by Serena Parekh". Human Rights Quarterly. 31 (1): 278–282. doi:10.1353/hrq.0.0062. JSTOR 20486747. S2CID 144735049.
  397. ↑ Dermot Moran, Introduction to Phenomenology.
  398. ↑ Spiegelberg, H. (2012). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Germany: Springer Netherlands.
  399. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 24.
  400. ↑ Dummett 1993, p. 26.
  401. ↑ Moran, Dermot (2020). Husserl and the Greeks. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 52 (2):98-117.
  402. ↑ Steinbock, A. J. (1995). Home and Beyond, Generative Phenomenology After Husserl. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy.
  403. ↑ The Phenomenology of Adolf Reinach: Chapters in the Theory of Knowledge and Legal Philosophy. LAV Brettler. McGill University, Ph.D. dissertation, 266 pp., 1973
  404. ↑ Kearney, R. (2003). Routledge History of Philosophy Volume VIII: Twentieth Century Continental Philosophy. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 168
  405. ↑ Moran, D., Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 57
  406. ↑ Lafont, C. (2000). Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  407. ↑ Heidegger, M. (2002). On Time and Being. United Kingdom: University of Chicago Press. p. 55
  408. ↑ Korab-Karpowicz 2016, p. 58.
  409. ↑ Riis, S. (2018). Unframing Martin Heidegger’s Understanding of Technology: On the Essential Connection Between Technology, Art, and History. United States: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  410. ↑ The Blackwell Companion to Hermeneutics. (2016). United Kingdom: Wiley. p. 162
  411. ↑ Mantzavinos, C. (22 June 2016). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 22 March 2018 – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  412. ↑ Dostal, R. J. (2022). Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: Between Phenomenology and Dialectic. United States: Northwestern University Press.
  413. 1 2 German 20th-century Philosophy: The Frankfurt School. (2000). United Kingdom: Continuum.
  414. ↑ Arato, Andrew; Gebhardt, Eike, eds. (1978). The essential Frankfurt School reader. New York: Urizen Books. pp. xiii–xiv. ISBN 091635430X.
  415. ↑ Habermas, Jürgen. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Third Edition, Vols. 1 & 2, Beacon Press.
  416. ↑ Habermas, Jürgen. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, MIT Press.
  417. ↑ Harste, G. (2021). The Habermas-Luhmann Debate. United States: Columbia University Press.

Sources

[edit]
  • Ayer, A. J., ed. (1959). "Editor's introduction". Logical Positivism. Free Press. pp. 3–30.
[edit]