Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b30291be87fd8

Jump to content

Outside the Walls

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Extramuros)

Outside the Walls
Theatrical release poster
SpanishExtramuros
Directed byMiguel Picazo
Screenplay byMiguel Picazo
Based on
Starring
CinematographyTeo Escamilla
Music byJosé Nieto
Production
companies
  • Blau Films
  • Miguel Picazo PC
Distributed byIncine
Release dates
  • September 1985 (1985-09) (Zinemaldia)
  • 27 September 1985 (1985-09-27) (Spain)
CountrySpain
LanguageSpanish

Outside the Walls (Spanish: Extramuros) is a 1985 Spanish drama film directed by Miguel Picazo based on the novel by Jesús Fernández Santos which stars Carmen Maura and Mercedes Sampietro.

Plot

[edit]

Set during the reign of Philip II,[1] the plot follows two nuns bonded by Lesbian affection (sor Ana and sor Ángela). With help from Ana, Ángela decides to fake stigmata to save her convent from economic hardship. These developments raise the prioress' suspicions and eventually the Holy Office intervenes.[2][3][4]

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

The film was produced by Blau Films and Miguel Picazo PC, and it had the participation of TVE.[7] Shooting locations included the convent of San Pedro de Dueñas (province of Segovia), Talamanca de Jarama, Peñaranda de Duero, Ávila, and Alcalá de Henares.[8]

Release

[edit]

The film screened at the 33rd San Sebastián International Film Festival in September 1985.[9] Distributed by Incine,[7] the film was released theatrically at Madrid's Palacio de la Música on 27 September 1985.[10][11] It had 156,158 admissions.[12]

Reception

[edit]

Clifford Terry of Chicago Tribune considered that Picazo managed to create a "bizarre, uneven but strangely compelling" film.[13]

Ángel Fernández-Santos of El País assessed that upon translation into images of the literary story the film "suffers from a multitude of defects that gradually become visible", and by the time the film ends, the latter "is difficult to sustain" "due to the accumulation [of those deffects].[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Torres, Augusto M. (2004). Directores españoles malditos. Madrid: Huerga & Fierro Editores. p. 38. ISBN 84-8374-480-5.
  2. ""Extramuros" y "Matador" en el Cine Club Perlas" (PDF). Perlas y Cuevas: 21. 15 November 1986.
  3. "'Extramuros', de Miguel Picazo, en 'Historia de nuestro cine'". Diez Minutos. 27 September 2019.
  4. Nieto Jiménez, Rafael (25 June 2018). "El cine de Miguel Picazo (5). Extramuros (1985)". Rinconete. Centro Virtual Cervantes.
  5. Claveras, Monserrat (2011) [2008]. La Pasión de Cristo en el cine. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro. p. 329. ISBN 9788499205687.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Claveras 2011, p. 329.
  7. 1 2 Riambau, Esteve; Torreiro, Casimiro (2008). Productores en el cine español. Estado, dependencias y mercado. Cátedra. p. 108. ISBN 9788437624624.
  8. García Santa Cecilia, Carlos (14 March 1985). "Miguel Picazo vuelve al cine con 'Extramuros', la historia de un milagro fingido por dos religiosas". El País.
  9. 1 2 Fernández-Santos, Ángel (26 September 1985). "Películas para el olvido". El País.
  10. "Extramuros · España 1985". Adaptaciones de la literatura española en el cine español. Referencias y bibliografía. Retrieved 21 May 2023 via Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes.
  11. Pelayo García, Irene (2011). Imagen fílmica del lesbianismo a través de los personajes protagonistas en el cine español (PDF). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. p. 368. ISBN 978-84-694-2459-9.
  12. Riambau & Torreiro 2008, p. 108.
  13. Terry, Clifford (24 January 1992). "1985 Spanish film is uneven but strangely compelling". Chicago Tribune.