Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a120ea28eeb87b

Jump to content

Talk:Voice for Baloch Missing Persons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Draft talk:Voice for Baloch Missing Persons)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Robert McClenon in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it provides information on an existing association active in Pakistan. Also, as the page author I am not associated with the organisation but have researched it as an independent academic for almost 10 years. Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.68.161.6 (talk) 14:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it provides crucial information on an association that exists in Pakistan. Also, I (as the page author) am an independent academic, and not a member of the organisation. No page on this association exists to date.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyasi2019 (talkcontribs) 14:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

[edit]

Hi, I saw that a page already existed on this topic, and have instead edited there. It is fine if this page is deleted, would do it myself but don't know how. Also PLEASE don't revert the changes in the last one. I'm not an algorithm, but an academic who knows what I'm talking about! -- @Siyasi2019 Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyasi2019 (talkcontribs) 19:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Siyasi2019. I saw your question at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Please take the time to carefully read through Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Expert editors, Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought because based upon your above posts, you might be misunderstanding the purpose of Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer Note

[edit]

This draft appears to satisfy notability.

I'm going to accept this. It is likely to survive AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply