Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22cab3cf954227c

Jump to content

Draft talk:StarBeast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Draft talk:StarBEAST)
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Alexei.drummond in topic Resubmission note

Conflict of interest declaration

[edit]

Conflict of interest disclosure

[edit]

I am a co-author of the first two versions of the software described in this article. I was involved in the development of *BEAST (Heled & Drummond, 2010) and StarBEAST2 (Ogilvie, Bouckaert & Drummond, 2017), two of the three versions covered here. To comply with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, I have not created the article directly in mainspace but am submitting this draft through Articles for Creation so that an independent reviewer evaluates it before publication. I welcome edits and scrutiny from uninvolved editors. Alexei.drummond (talk) 02:41, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Resubmission note

[edit]

The draft was declined for lacking independent secondary sources establishing notability. To address this, I have added a "Reception and use" section citing independent reviews that discuss *BEAST/StarBEAST specifically:

  • Jiao, Flouri & Yang (2021), National Science Review — describe *BEAST
 and BPP as the two Bayesian multispecies-coalescent programs in common use.
  • Rannala, Edwards, Leaché & Yang (2020), Phylogenetics in the Genomic Era
 identify *BEAST as a standard full-likelihood implementation of the model.
  • Liu, Wu & Yu (2015), Journal of Systematics and Evolution — review it among
 coalescent species-tree methods.
  • Chou et al. (2015), BMC Genomics — use it as a reference point in a
 method-comparison study.

These are independent of the software's developers. Two empirical applications have also been added as illustrations of use. My conflict of interest remains as disclosed above. Alexei.drummond (talk) 07:03, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply