Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a288f731bd541dfc

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did "Utilis Coquinario" say to the chef? "You can cook on me.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Draft:Utilis Coquinario)

Utilis Coquinario ('Useful for the Kitchen'[1]) is an English cookery book written in Middle English in the late fourteenth[2] or very early fifteenth century.[3] The text is contained in the Hans Sloane collection of manuscripts in the British Library and is numbered Sloane MS 468.[4][5]

Author

[edit]

The author's name is unknown. It has been theorised that he was "the high-ranking chef of a large kitchen", though not one as large as that of Richard II (for example, compare this text to The Forme of Cury).[6] It is accordingly assumed that he was a man.[7][a] The resemblance of some of the author's recipes to early French recipes indicates the author may have had a reading knowledge of Middle French.[7] The author's references to "fyssh day" and Lent indicate that the author cooked for a Christian household.[8]

Text

[edit]

Contents

[edit]

The manuscript contains recipes for things such as butter of almond milk,[9] roasted duck,[10] a meat pottage[11] and a sweet-and-sour fish preparation.[12][13] The manuscript is loosely organised and has no real system beyond a basic grouping of recipes for cooking birds, blancmange, and fruits and flowers.[1][7]

Purpose

[edit]

It has been suggested that the text was not intended as a cookbook for the layperson since the level of lay literacy at the time was still relatively low and distribution of manuscripts was a "patchy affair".[14] Several alternative purposes for its creation have been proposed, including: serving as testimony to the author's culinary skill,[14] presenting and influencing trends,[14] securing the status of the chef as a professional,[14] and serving as a tool for professionals (e.g. doctors and lawyers) aspiring to raise their class status by learning about higher-class meals.[15] The latter theory has been proposed in part due to the text's location in the Sloane collection of manuscripts, where it is placed in a selection of medical recipes described as "utilitarian".[16]

Modern study

[edit]

The text is notable to both culinary historians and linguists, containing several examples of unique recipes and vocabulary.

Historical interest

[edit]

Of historical interest, the work contains the only references to recipes such as pyany (a poultry dish garnished with peonies) and heppee (a rose-hip broth).[14] The text was written in the time of Geoffrey Chaucer and provides insight into the types of food Chaucer may have eaten and written about.[17] As was the case with most late medieval cooking, the author did not associate colours with specific flavours, but he did occasionally use colour to denote contrasts in flavour.[18] For example, one of the included fish recipes uses saffron in part of the dish flavoured with sugar and ginger (giving that part a reddish, saffron colour), and leaves the remaining part of the dish white to denote that it is flavoured with sugar only.[18]

Linguistic interest

[edit]

Of linguistic interest, it contains the only known references in fourteenth-century English texts to cormorants and finches.[14] Additionally, it contains the only references to woodcocks, botores (bittern), pluuers (plovers), and teals in fourteenth-century English cookbooks, though all are found elsewhere in menus of that era.[14]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. Though women of the time were responsible for basic domestic cooking, professional chef work in large kitchens was undertaken by men.[7]

Citations

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Notaker 2017, p. 89.
  2. Carroll 1996, p. 45.
  3. Hieatt 1985, p. 19.
  4. Kernan 2016, p. 64.
  5. "Entry for "Cookery Recipes in BL MS Sloane 468" in Middle English Compendium HyperBibliography". quod.lib.umich.edu. University of Michigan. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  6. Carroll 1996, p. 48.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Carroll 1996, p. 46.
  8. Carroll 1996, pp. 47, 50.
  9. Matterer, James L. "Medieval Recipe Translations – Botere of almand melk". www.godecookery.com.
  10. Matterer, James L. "Malardis". www.godecookery.com.
  11. Matterer, James L. "Medieval Recipe Translations – Chauden for potage". www.godecookery.com.
  12. Matterer, James L. "A dauce egre". www.godecookery.com.
  13. "MS BL Sloane 468". www.medievalcookery.com.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Carroll 1996, p. 47.
  15. Kernan 2016, pp. 13–14, 64–65.
  16. Kernan 2016, pp. 64–65.
  17. Matterer, James. "Chaucer and Food". Food in the Arts. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
  18. 1 2 Woolgar 2017, pp. 18–19.

Bibliography

[edit]