Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25f9be9ec1aa5f3

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Black v The Queen case say to its verdict? You're 'guilty' of a bad ruling.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Black direction)

Black v The Queen
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Decided22 December 1993
Citations[1993] HCA 71, (1993) 179 CLR 44
Case history
Appealed fromNSW Court of Criminal Appeal
Court membership
Judges sittingMason CJ, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, & McHugh JJ

Black v The Queen[1] is a decision of the High Court of Australia.

In the first trial, Black was found guilty of two crimes of arson by a jury but only after the trial judge had directed the jurors make a majority decision.

On appeal to the High Court of Australia, the decision was set aside, and a new trial ordered.

The Court's finding

[edit]

The majority ruling found that judge did not instruct the jury appropriately in relation to the flaws in the police interviews. They found that the trial judge should have told them to scrutinise police interviews closely.[2] It additionally found that the jury must be free to deliberate without any pressure being brought upon them.[3]

The Court quashed the conviction, set aside the decision of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal and ordered a new trial.

Broader applications

[edit]

In Australian law, a "Black direction" is a direction by a judge to a jury to reconsider the votes of a small number of jury members.[4]

In Queensland, a judge may make a "Black direction" to a jury.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Black v The Queen [1993] HCA 71, (1993) 179 CLR 44 (22 December 1993), High Court.
  2. Black v R, paragraph 26
  3. "Prospect of disagreement". Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book. NSW Judicial Commission.
  4. "Majority report". The Sydney Morning Herald. 27 July 2002. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  5. "Jury Failure to Agree – Benchbook – March 2017 Amendments No 54.1" (PDF). Queensland Courts. Supreme Court of Queensland. March 2017. Retrieved 14 February 2018.