Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a402bb1d3a2c4afc

Jump to content

Balmer jump

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Balmer break)
Balmer discontinuity on the observational spectrum of the star Icarus. The jump in this plot appears around 920 nm (instead of the intrinsic 364.5 nm) due to cosmological redshift.
Balmer jump of two stars: Epsilon Orionis (O9.7 V) on the top and Beta Tauri (B7 III) on the bottom. The vertical blue line represents the limit of the Balmer series.

The Balmer jump, Balmer discontinuity, or Balmer break is the difference of intensity of the stellar spectrum on either side of the limit of the Balmer series of hydrogen, at approximately 364.5 nm. It is caused by electrons being completely ionized directly from the second energy level of a hydrogen atom (bound-free absorption). Since a freed electron can take on any kinetic energy level, compared to a bound electron whose energy levels are discrete, this creates a continuum absorption at wavelengths shorter than 364.5 nm.[1]

In some cases the Balmer discontinuity can show continuum emission, usually when the Balmer lines themselves are strongly in emission.[2][3] Other hydrogen spectral series also show bound-free absorption and hence a continuum discontinuity, but the Balmer jump in the near UV has been the most observed.[4][5]

The strength of the continuum absorption, and hence the size of the Balmer jump, depends on temperature and density in the region responsible for the absorption. At cooler stellar temperatures, the density most strongly affects the strength of the discontinuity and this can be used to classify stars on the basis of their surface gravity and hence luminosity.[6] This effect is strongest in A class stars, but in hotter stars temperature has a much larger effect on the Balmer jump than surface gravity.[2][7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Mihalas, Dimitri (1967). "Statistical-Equilibrium Model Atmospheres for Early-Type Stars. I. Hydrogen Continua". Astrophysical Journal. 149: 169. Bibcode:1967ApJ...149..169M. doi:10.1086/149239.
  2. 1 2 Slettebak, A.; Stock, J. (1957). "Classification of Early Type Stars of High Luminosity with Objective Prism Spectra of Low Dispersion. With 7 figures". Zeitschrift für Astrophysik. 42: 67. Bibcode:1957ZA.....42...67S.
  3. Knigge, Christian; Long, Knox S.; Wade, Richard A.; Baptista, Raymundo; Horne, Keith; Hubeny, Ivan; Rutten, Rene G. M. (1998). "Hubble Space Telescope Eclipse Observations of the Nova‐like Cataclysmic Variable UX Ursae Majoris". The Astrophysical Journal. 499 (1): 414–428. arXiv:astro-ph/9801206. Bibcode:1998ApJ...499..414K. doi:10.1086/305617.
  4. Liu, X.-W.; Danziger, J. (1993). "Electron temperature determination from nebular continuum emission in planetary nebulae and the importance of temperature fluctuations". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 263: 256–266. Bibcode:1993MNRAS.263..256L. doi:10.1093/mnras/263.1.256.
  5. Scargle, J. D.; Erickson, E. F.; Witteborn, F. C.; Strecker, D. W. (1978). "Infrared excesses in early-type stars - Gamma Cassiopeiae". Astrophysical Journal. 224: 527. Bibcode:1978ApJ...224..527S. doi:10.1086/156400.
  6. Bessell, Michael S. (2007). "Measuring the Balmer Jump and the Effective Gravity in FGK Stars". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 119 (856): 605–615. arXiv:0706.2739. Bibcode:2007PASP..119..605B. doi:10.1086/519981.
  7. Crowther, P. A. (1997). "The effective temperatures of hot stars". International Astronomical Union Symposium. 189: 137–146. Bibcode:1997IAUS..189..137C. doi:10.1017/S0074180900116614.